<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Pynchon and Crunch: Heroes of the Underworld Wide Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2001/02/pynchon-and-crunch-heroes-of-the-underworld-wide-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Pynchon and Crunch: Heroes of the Underworld Wide Web</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2001/02/pynchon-and-crunch-heroes-of-the-underworld-wide-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2001/02/pynchon-and-crunch-heroes-of-the-underworld-wide-web/</link>
			<dc:creator>Ron Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2001/02/pynchon-and-crunch-heroes-of-the-underworld-wide-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a lot of loneliness and frustration in the writing</p>
<p>life, and sometimes it can seem to outweigh the pleasures and rewards. So I</p>
<p>hope you'll forgive me if I spend a little time dwelling on one of the real</p>
<p>sustaining satisfactions I've had from it all: being present at the creation,</p>
<p>being part of the creation of a true American hero, a genuine-and, I think,</p>
<p>genuinely significant-mythic American icon. I'm speaking, of course, of Captain</p>
<p>Crunch.</p>
<p> Well, not just Crunch, but the whole crew of phone phreaks,</p>
<p>proto-hackers and blind boy-electronic-geniuses who created outlaw cyber</p>
<p>culture. The whole crew whose existence first became known to the world in one</p>
<p>of the first magazine stories I ever wrote, a story called "Secrets of the</p>
<p>Little Blue Box" in the October 1971 Esquire .</p>
<p> The whole crew, yes, but especially Captain Crunch,</p>
<p>pseudonym of the first hacker superhero. I'm not writing this to claim credit</p>
<p>for their achievements, for their creation of a genuinely subversive rebellion</p>
<p>against (and critique of) techno-totalizing culture-an Underworld Wide Web, you</p>
<p>might say. In fact, one reason I'm writing this is to share credit with someone else-with another writer,  whose prophetic novel about an underground</p>
<p>web of subversive communicants shaped the way I wrote about the phone phreaks</p>
<p>and the proto-hackers. I'm speaking of Thomas Pynchon and his 1965 ­novel, The Crying of Lot 49 .</p>
<p> I was reminded of the Pynchon connection when a British</p>
<p>documentary producer came to New York to tape an interview with me for Channel</p>
<p>Four in London, which (in conjunction with the Learning Channel here) is doing</p>
<p>a documentary about the origins of hacker culture. His name was Ralph Lee, and</p>
<p>he seemed like an extraordinarily energetic and intelligent reporter, someone</p>
<p>who really got the sensibility of the</p>
<p>phone phreaks and hackers; it gave one hope that the documentary might be the</p>
<p>first to ­really do justice to the subject the way feature films have so far</p>
<p>failed to.</p>
<p> Mr. Lee had been retracing the steps I'd taken on my initial</p>
<p>odyssey into the phone-phreak underworld, relocating certain key characters in</p>
<p>my story, including Crunch; "Mark Bernay" (a.k.a. the Midnight Skulker); and</p>
<p>Joe Engressia, the original blind boy-genius. And certain other individuals</p>
<p>whose lives had been changed by the story, such as Steve Wozniak, co-founder of</p>
<p>Apple with Steve Jobs.</p>
<p> I'd read elsewhere that the Wozniak-Jobs partnership had</p>
<p>been forged when, as teenagers, they'd read my "Blue Box" ­story and decided to</p>
<p>try to manufacture the illicit cell-phone-sized free-call " blue box" devices</p>
<p>in their parents' garage. While they apparently weren't too successful at</p>
<p>making a profit, they did make a connection :</p>
<p>to the pioneers of cyber-hacker culture such as Captain Crunch, and to the</p>
<p>rebel ­sensibility that (for a while) inspired Apple. My story inspired many</p>
<p>other kindred spirits to become phreaks and hackers, forging alliances of</p>
<p>isolated local networks into an Underworld Wide Web of techno rebels.</p>
<p> Forgive me if I take a paternal pride in characters like</p>
<p>Crunch, Bernay and Engressia. As I said, I want to share paternity with someone else. If my story helped father hacker</p>
<p>culture, Thomas Pynchon is, at the very least, its ghostly godfather.</p>
<p> What reminded me of the debt I owe (we all owe) to</p>
<p>Pynchon-as a prophet who tells us more about the deep structure of contemporary</p>
<p>culture than any other artist or political theorist I know of-was a single</p>
<p>three-word phrase: "the lawyer Metzger."</p>
<p> The lawyer Metzger: It came up when Ralph Lee asked me how</p>
<p>I'd come upon the phone-phreak underground in the first place. It was something</p>
<p>I couldn't reveal in my original story because of security constraints. It's</p>
<p>something that time-and the statute of limitations-permit me to disclose here.</p>
<p>It involved a daring plan by an outlaw "blue-box" entrepreneur to bring the</p>
<p>phone company-then the undivided, all-smothering Ma Bell-to its knees with a</p>
<p>devastating coup … of which I was to be the chosen instrument.</p>
<p> See, this lawyer named Metzger had reached out to Harold</p>
<p>Hayes, the legendary Esquire editor,</p>
<p>through his ­protégé, Craig Karpel, and said he had a client who was very, very</p>
<p>angry with the phone company-primarily for getting him busted for selling</p>
<p>illicit "blue boxes" to Las Vegas organized-crime figures. "Blue boxes"</p>
<p>permitted the user to make unlimited, untraceable free phone calls all over the</p>
<p>world-often an asset to gamblers, dealers and others who preferred anonymity</p>
<p>and free long distance. Blue boxes were, ironically enough, invented and</p>
<p>popularized by a network of mostly blind whiz kids who used them not for</p>
<p>profit, but to create their own Web-like community in the worm holes they found</p>
<p>in Ma Bell's etheric net.</p>
<p> Anyway, the lawyer Metzger said his client was so incensed</p>
<p>at the Darth Vaders of the phone company's security division that he wanted to</p>
<p>strike back at the Evil Empire in a devastating way. What this fellow-whom I've</p>
<p>never named, and whose name I've since forgotten (although I'd love to hear</p>
<p>from him)-wanted Esquire to do was to</p>
<p>include, bound in the issue that</p>
<p>carried my story, a vinyl disc, a 45 r.p.m. record that contained the secret</p>
<p>codes that comprised internal phone-company signaling tones. So that everybody</p>
<p>in America could make a blue box and bankrupt Ma Bell.</p>
<p> You could, if you were charitable, see this as an</p>
<p>anticipation of the "open source" movement in contemporary cyber culture. But</p>
<p>you could also look at it-as I believe Esquire's</p>
<p> lawyers did when they nixed the idea-as opening oneself up to a charge of</p>
<p>criminal conspiracy. But by introducing me, and thus the world, to the existence</p>
<p>of an illicit underground communications network, he accomplished something</p>
<p>more far- reachingly subversive.</p>
<p> He was the first to tell me about the then-embryonic field</p>
<p>of computer hacking-demonstrating to me how to modem into a mainframe (this was</p>
<p>1971) and search out the passwords.</p>
<p> It was this guy (the lawyer Metzger's client), who</p>
<p>introduced me to Joe Engressia, the blind phone-phreak adept who was, I</p>
<p>believe, the first to discover the secret utility to the Cap'n Crunch whistle.</p>
<p>The Cap'n Crunch whistle, a little cheap plastic job, was a key icon (or maybe</p>
<p>an iconic key) to the phone-phreak underground: It was the key that unlocked Ma</p>
<p>Bell's treasures. The makers of Cap'n Crunch cereal had no idea (I think) of</p>
<p>what they were doing when they decided to include the little "bosun whistle"</p>
<p>(in keeping with the nautical theme) in the cereal box, much like the prize</p>
<p>found in Cracker Jacks. But Engressia, who was gifted with perfect pitch,</p>
<p>discovered that the whistle produced a perfect 2,600-­cycle-per-second tone, a</p>
<p>high-pitched note that was the entry</p>
<p>signal to the phone company's electronic switching system. The tone that, in</p>
<p>the hands of a skilled hacker-phreak, allowed unlimited, untraceable access to</p>
<p>the long-distance lines-and through a modem, to the innards of computers.</p>
<p> I'd never actually seen one of the Cap'n Crunch whistles</p>
<p>(which were quickly taken off the market), but the enterprising Ralph Lee had</p>
<p>unearthed one, which he showed me when I arrived for the taping. I felt the</p>
<p>kind of thrill archaeologists must have gotten when they first came upon the</p>
<p>Rosetta Stone. Anyway, it was this device that gave the name to phone-phreak</p>
<p>superhero Captain Crunch. What a guy: a kind of Bizarro-world Thomas Edison, or</p>
<p>Alexander Graham Bell, the myth of the American inventor merged with the myth</p>
<p>of the American outlaw and the attitude of a comic-book superhero; Gyro</p>
<p>Gearloose crossed with the Phantom. Faster than a speeding bullet, he'd travel</p>
<p>the freeways of America, ducking into a phone booth (just like Superman) and</p>
<p>transform himself by hooking up his famous computerized unit, thus making the</p>
<p>phone booth a kind of transporter that beamed him up into the world wide web of</p>
<p>the telephone system. He'd zap his voice around the globe before disappearing,</p>
<p>Phantom-like, into the ether.</p>
<p> I only met Captain Crunch in person once, although he</p>
<p>shadowed me throughout my phone-phreak odyssey, peppering me with phone calls,</p>
<p>building his own self-mythology. Our meeting was in a McDonald's in San Jose,</p>
<p>Calif., a few months after my story came out, at which time he seemed grateful</p>
<p>for the (well-­deserved) iconic stature I'd endowed him with and the vast new</p>
<p>network of admirers he'd acquired, although I know he's had mixed feelings</p>
<p>since about some of the consequences.</p>
<p> Crunch was the real star of the story (which is reprinted in</p>
<p>my new nonfiction collection, The Secret</p>
<p>Parts of Fortune ); he was the one who became the icon, but his flamboyance</p>
<p>perhaps unfairly overshadowed an equally influential proto-­hacker-Mark Bernay,</p>
<p>a.k.a. the ­Midnight Skulker. It was Bernay who acted as the Johnny Appleseed</p>
<p>of phone phreakdom, traveling up and down the West Coast in the late 60's</p>
<p>pasting little stickers in phone booths that gave the numbers for "toll-free</p>
<p>looparounds," AT&amp;T tech-check connections that permitted nationwide free</p>
<p>conference calls, the primitive proto-Internet of the blind phone phreaks and</p>
<p>hackers. And it was Bernay who sketched out for me the Manichaean, metaphysical</p>
<p>pleasures of computer hacking: the cat-and-mouse games with security, the</p>
<p>intellectual game-playing that holds the appeal for the most advanced hackers.</p>
<p>(Bernay would often tell security how to detect the Midnight Skulker just to</p>
<p>raise the game to another level.)</p>
<p> I think it was Bernay's phone-booth stickering that first</p>
<p>evoked a Pynchon vibe in me when I was reporting the story. Because, as a</p>
<p>youthful fan of Pynchon's The Crying of</p>
<p>Lot 49 , I'd done some stickering myself; I used to sticker phone booths</p>
<p>with the sign of the muted post horn, the symbol of the Trystero , the shadowy conspiratorial network in</p>
<p>Pynchon's novel. (See illustration.)</p>
<p> Anyway, entering the phone-phreak underground was like</p>
<p>entering the Trystero underground. Among many things that make The Crying of Lot 49 perhaps the great American visionary work of the</p>
<p>past century (a novel that ranks in my pantheon with Pale Fire ) is its imagination of an alternate communication system,</p>
<p>a Web uniting the disaffected, the disillusioned and the just plain disgruntled</p>
<p>in America. The outsiders who no longer trusted their private dreams and</p>
<p>longings to the official public channels of communication (like the post office</p>
<p>and the phone company). A fantasied conspiracy-as-communion that took the form</p>
<p>of an underground postal system. A vision that took as its sign and symbol "the</p>
<p>muted posthorn," the symbol of  Thurn</p>
<p>and Taxis, the ancient European private postal service-with a mute silencing</p>
<p>it.</p>
<p> Curiously, "mute" was</p>
<p>the phone-phreak term for one of their key artifacts, a skeleton-key device to</p>
<p>generate the 2,600-cycle-per-second tone that put the phone company's</p>
<p>long-distance signaling system at their command. Coincidence? Were the phone</p>
<p>phreaks life imitating (Pynchon's) art? Or was Pynchon's art anticipating,</p>
<p>prophesizing life? I don't think it's just me seeing things through the lens of</p>
<p>Pynchon; I think it's Pynchon foreseeing</p>
<p>things. Foreseeing, as he put it in the novel, "a network by which x number of Americans are truly</p>
<p>communicating … among a web of telephone wires … searching ceaselessly among</p>
<p>the dial's ten million possibilities for that magical Other who will reveal</p>
<p>herself out of the roar of relays." Sound familiar?</p>
<p> But there was one particularly spooky foresight or</p>
<p>foreshadowing that floored me: "the lawyer Metzger." As I was talking to the</p>
<p>documentary producer about the origin of my odyssey in a lawyer named Metzger,</p>
<p>it suddenly struck me: Wait a minute, wasn't there a lawyer named Metzger in The Crying of Lot 49 ?</p>
<p> I raced home and dug out my copy of the novel. There it was,</p>
<p>on page 17: Oedipa Maas, Pynchon's heroine, receives a summons from the estate</p>
<p>of a deceased lover, Pierce Inverarity. She is to be the executrix of his</p>
<p>tangled last will and testament, a labyrinthine legacy embedded, encoded in the</p>
<p>circuit board of the new American landscape.</p>
<p> She checks into the Echo Court motel in the San Francisco</p>
<p>suburb of San Narciso, and "That night the lawyer Metzger showed up." Her</p>
<p>guide. I won't dwell much further on the fictional lawyer Metzger himself, or</p>
<p>the fact that he turns out to be the former child actor Baby Igor, or on one of</p>
<p>the all-time great seduction scenes in American literature (one that also</p>
<p>serves as a metaphor for the veiling and unveiling of Truth!), the one that</p>
<p>ensues when Metzger and Oedipa watch a Baby ­Igor movie on the motel-room TV.</p>
<p>Except to say that, in very much the same way that a lawyer named Metzger was</p>
<p>my connection to the underworld realm, "the lawyer Metzger" is the one who</p>
<p>connects Pynchon's heroine to the shadowy Trystero underground. Coincidence?</p>
<p> One of the persistent concerns of The Crying of Lot 49 is the nature of coincidence. How does one</p>
<p>distinguish accident and chance from pattern and plan, signal from noise, order</p>
<p>from randomness, conspiracy from paranoia-in physics, in history, in human</p>
<p>consciousness?</p>
<p> I won't detain you with any further meditations on this</p>
<p>subject (not now, anyway), but the coincidence of the fictional and factual</p>
<p>"lawyer Metzger" both serving as Vergilian guides to an underworld labyrinth is</p>
<p>(as I believe Martin Heidegger put it in his famous Marburg seminar on</p>
<p>Heraclitus and the pre-Socratics) "pretty freaky, dude."</p>
<p> But I do want to talk about the vision of The Crying of Lot 49 and its embodiment</p>
<p>in the ideals of enlightened phreaks and hackers as a political vision. I'd contend they are the true opposition party in American culture, or at least the smartest</p>
<p>one. They have a far more knowing and savvy critique of technological totalism</p>
<p>than postmodernists,post-Marxistsand ­cultural-studies savants, all of whom are</p>
<p>in thrall to totalizing ideological systems even as they purport to critique</p>
<p>such systems.</p>
<p> They-my guys, the Pynchonian underground-are the ultimate</p>
<p>opposition to systemization. But theirs is not, I repeat, not a Luddite critique. These guys love the possibilities of technology; they love systems and they</p>
<p>love to fuck with systems. (Fuck with them like lovers.) They know that systems</p>
<p>tend to become stagnant, oppressive and totalitarian unless they're fucked</p>
<p>with. That they only evolve under the pressure that punctures their</p>
<p>self-confidence.</p>
<p> But I would argue that my party, the Pynchon-Crunch</p>
<p>opposition, are more than political-they're also a philosophical opposition.</p>
<p>Although Captain Crunch may not immediately strike one as a philosopher in the</p>
<p>mode of Aristotle or Kant, the cyber-­hackers can be seen as descendants of the</p>
<p>Skeptics, the ones who ­refute the pretenses of the overconfident</p>
<p>system-builders.</p>
<p> Perhaps (like all great lifelong passions) my predilection</p>
<p>for cyber skeptics can be traced back to high school. It was in high school</p>
<p>that I read Pynchon, and it was in high school that I was engaged in a friendly</p>
<p>rivalry with a tech-minded classmate named Bob Metcalfe, who later went on to</p>
<p>become a legendary cyber-world system-builder and theorist: He invented</p>
<p>Ethernet and "Metcalfe's Law" ("the value of a network grows by the square of</p>
<p>the size of the network"-is this a real law of science or a clever Ethernet</p>
<p>promotion?). Mr. Metcalfe is a terrifically good-natured techno-optimist of the</p>
<p>George Gilder school, and I have great respect for his achievements. But after</p>
<p>high school we went our separate ways, and I cast my lot with the anti-system</p>
<p>skeptics-the losers, the left-out, the lost causes, the disillusioned and the</p>
<p>disappointed, the doomed Romantic visionaries. But we've got Captain Crunch and</p>
<p>Thomas Pynchon on our side.</p>
<p> Endnote: It occurred to me that this is what I was getting</p>
<p>at a few months ago when I announced the formation of The Edgy Alliance: a</p>
<p>Trystero-like linkage of kindred spirits. And so I'd like to open the</p>
<p>membership rolls again and ask any who want to join the nearly 300 Edgy Allies</p>
<p>to whom I've already sent membership cards, to send their name and address (and</p>
<p>also suggested column topics) to The Edgy Alliance, Box 105, 577 Second Avenue,</p>
<p>New York, N.Y. 10016. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a lot of loneliness and frustration in the writing</p>
<p>life, and sometimes it can seem to outweigh the pleasures and rewards. So I</p>
<p>hope you'll forgive me if I spend a little time dwelling on one of the real</p>
<p>sustaining satisfactions I've had from it all: being present at the creation,</p>
<p>being part of the creation of a true American hero, a genuine-and, I think,</p>
<p>genuinely significant-mythic American icon. I'm speaking, of course, of Captain</p>
<p>Crunch.</p>
<p> Well, not just Crunch, but the whole crew of phone phreaks,</p>
<p>proto-hackers and blind boy-electronic-geniuses who created outlaw cyber</p>
<p>culture. The whole crew whose existence first became known to the world in one</p>
<p>of the first magazine stories I ever wrote, a story called "Secrets of the</p>
<p>Little Blue Box" in the October 1971 Esquire .</p>
<p> The whole crew, yes, but especially Captain Crunch,</p>
<p>pseudonym of the first hacker superhero. I'm not writing this to claim credit</p>
<p>for their achievements, for their creation of a genuinely subversive rebellion</p>
<p>against (and critique of) techno-totalizing culture-an Underworld Wide Web, you</p>
<p>might say. In fact, one reason I'm writing this is to share credit with someone else-with another writer,  whose prophetic novel about an underground</p>
<p>web of subversive communicants shaped the way I wrote about the phone phreaks</p>
<p>and the proto-hackers. I'm speaking of Thomas Pynchon and his 1965 ­novel, The Crying of Lot 49 .</p>
<p> I was reminded of the Pynchon connection when a British</p>
<p>documentary producer came to New York to tape an interview with me for Channel</p>
<p>Four in London, which (in conjunction with the Learning Channel here) is doing</p>
<p>a documentary about the origins of hacker culture. His name was Ralph Lee, and</p>
<p>he seemed like an extraordinarily energetic and intelligent reporter, someone</p>
<p>who really got the sensibility of the</p>
<p>phone phreaks and hackers; it gave one hope that the documentary might be the</p>
<p>first to ­really do justice to the subject the way feature films have so far</p>
<p>failed to.</p>
<p> Mr. Lee had been retracing the steps I'd taken on my initial</p>
<p>odyssey into the phone-phreak underworld, relocating certain key characters in</p>
<p>my story, including Crunch; "Mark Bernay" (a.k.a. the Midnight Skulker); and</p>
<p>Joe Engressia, the original blind boy-genius. And certain other individuals</p>
<p>whose lives had been changed by the story, such as Steve Wozniak, co-founder of</p>
<p>Apple with Steve Jobs.</p>
<p> I'd read elsewhere that the Wozniak-Jobs partnership had</p>
<p>been forged when, as teenagers, they'd read my "Blue Box" ­story and decided to</p>
<p>try to manufacture the illicit cell-phone-sized free-call " blue box" devices</p>
<p>in their parents' garage. While they apparently weren't too successful at</p>
<p>making a profit, they did make a connection :</p>
<p>to the pioneers of cyber-hacker culture such as Captain Crunch, and to the</p>
<p>rebel ­sensibility that (for a while) inspired Apple. My story inspired many</p>
<p>other kindred spirits to become phreaks and hackers, forging alliances of</p>
<p>isolated local networks into an Underworld Wide Web of techno rebels.</p>
<p> Forgive me if I take a paternal pride in characters like</p>
<p>Crunch, Bernay and Engressia. As I said, I want to share paternity with someone else. If my story helped father hacker</p>
<p>culture, Thomas Pynchon is, at the very least, its ghostly godfather.</p>
<p> What reminded me of the debt I owe (we all owe) to</p>
<p>Pynchon-as a prophet who tells us more about the deep structure of contemporary</p>
<p>culture than any other artist or political theorist I know of-was a single</p>
<p>three-word phrase: "the lawyer Metzger."</p>
<p> The lawyer Metzger: It came up when Ralph Lee asked me how</p>
<p>I'd come upon the phone-phreak underground in the first place. It was something</p>
<p>I couldn't reveal in my original story because of security constraints. It's</p>
<p>something that time-and the statute of limitations-permit me to disclose here.</p>
<p>It involved a daring plan by an outlaw "blue-box" entrepreneur to bring the</p>
<p>phone company-then the undivided, all-smothering Ma Bell-to its knees with a</p>
<p>devastating coup … of which I was to be the chosen instrument.</p>
<p> See, this lawyer named Metzger had reached out to Harold</p>
<p>Hayes, the legendary Esquire editor,</p>
<p>through his ­protégé, Craig Karpel, and said he had a client who was very, very</p>
<p>angry with the phone company-primarily for getting him busted for selling</p>
<p>illicit "blue boxes" to Las Vegas organized-crime figures. "Blue boxes"</p>
<p>permitted the user to make unlimited, untraceable free phone calls all over the</p>
<p>world-often an asset to gamblers, dealers and others who preferred anonymity</p>
<p>and free long distance. Blue boxes were, ironically enough, invented and</p>
<p>popularized by a network of mostly blind whiz kids who used them not for</p>
<p>profit, but to create their own Web-like community in the worm holes they found</p>
<p>in Ma Bell's etheric net.</p>
<p> Anyway, the lawyer Metzger said his client was so incensed</p>
<p>at the Darth Vaders of the phone company's security division that he wanted to</p>
<p>strike back at the Evil Empire in a devastating way. What this fellow-whom I've</p>
<p>never named, and whose name I've since forgotten (although I'd love to hear</p>
<p>from him)-wanted Esquire to do was to</p>
<p>include, bound in the issue that</p>
<p>carried my story, a vinyl disc, a 45 r.p.m. record that contained the secret</p>
<p>codes that comprised internal phone-company signaling tones. So that everybody</p>
<p>in America could make a blue box and bankrupt Ma Bell.</p>
<p> You could, if you were charitable, see this as an</p>
<p>anticipation of the "open source" movement in contemporary cyber culture. But</p>
<p>you could also look at it-as I believe Esquire's</p>
<p> lawyers did when they nixed the idea-as opening oneself up to a charge of</p>
<p>criminal conspiracy. But by introducing me, and thus the world, to the existence</p>
<p>of an illicit underground communications network, he accomplished something</p>
<p>more far- reachingly subversive.</p>
<p> He was the first to tell me about the then-embryonic field</p>
<p>of computer hacking-demonstrating to me how to modem into a mainframe (this was</p>
<p>1971) and search out the passwords.</p>
<p> It was this guy (the lawyer Metzger's client), who</p>
<p>introduced me to Joe Engressia, the blind phone-phreak adept who was, I</p>
<p>believe, the first to discover the secret utility to the Cap'n Crunch whistle.</p>
<p>The Cap'n Crunch whistle, a little cheap plastic job, was a key icon (or maybe</p>
<p>an iconic key) to the phone-phreak underground: It was the key that unlocked Ma</p>
<p>Bell's treasures. The makers of Cap'n Crunch cereal had no idea (I think) of</p>
<p>what they were doing when they decided to include the little "bosun whistle"</p>
<p>(in keeping with the nautical theme) in the cereal box, much like the prize</p>
<p>found in Cracker Jacks. But Engressia, who was gifted with perfect pitch,</p>
<p>discovered that the whistle produced a perfect 2,600-­cycle-per-second tone, a</p>
<p>high-pitched note that was the entry</p>
<p>signal to the phone company's electronic switching system. The tone that, in</p>
<p>the hands of a skilled hacker-phreak, allowed unlimited, untraceable access to</p>
<p>the long-distance lines-and through a modem, to the innards of computers.</p>
<p> I'd never actually seen one of the Cap'n Crunch whistles</p>
<p>(which were quickly taken off the market), but the enterprising Ralph Lee had</p>
<p>unearthed one, which he showed me when I arrived for the taping. I felt the</p>
<p>kind of thrill archaeologists must have gotten when they first came upon the</p>
<p>Rosetta Stone. Anyway, it was this device that gave the name to phone-phreak</p>
<p>superhero Captain Crunch. What a guy: a kind of Bizarro-world Thomas Edison, or</p>
<p>Alexander Graham Bell, the myth of the American inventor merged with the myth</p>
<p>of the American outlaw and the attitude of a comic-book superhero; Gyro</p>
<p>Gearloose crossed with the Phantom. Faster than a speeding bullet, he'd travel</p>
<p>the freeways of America, ducking into a phone booth (just like Superman) and</p>
<p>transform himself by hooking up his famous computerized unit, thus making the</p>
<p>phone booth a kind of transporter that beamed him up into the world wide web of</p>
<p>the telephone system. He'd zap his voice around the globe before disappearing,</p>
<p>Phantom-like, into the ether.</p>
<p> I only met Captain Crunch in person once, although he</p>
<p>shadowed me throughout my phone-phreak odyssey, peppering me with phone calls,</p>
<p>building his own self-mythology. Our meeting was in a McDonald's in San Jose,</p>
<p>Calif., a few months after my story came out, at which time he seemed grateful</p>
<p>for the (well-­deserved) iconic stature I'd endowed him with and the vast new</p>
<p>network of admirers he'd acquired, although I know he's had mixed feelings</p>
<p>since about some of the consequences.</p>
<p> Crunch was the real star of the story (which is reprinted in</p>
<p>my new nonfiction collection, The Secret</p>
<p>Parts of Fortune ); he was the one who became the icon, but his flamboyance</p>
<p>perhaps unfairly overshadowed an equally influential proto-­hacker-Mark Bernay,</p>
<p>a.k.a. the ­Midnight Skulker. It was Bernay who acted as the Johnny Appleseed</p>
<p>of phone phreakdom, traveling up and down the West Coast in the late 60's</p>
<p>pasting little stickers in phone booths that gave the numbers for "toll-free</p>
<p>looparounds," AT&amp;T tech-check connections that permitted nationwide free</p>
<p>conference calls, the primitive proto-Internet of the blind phone phreaks and</p>
<p>hackers. And it was Bernay who sketched out for me the Manichaean, metaphysical</p>
<p>pleasures of computer hacking: the cat-and-mouse games with security, the</p>
<p>intellectual game-playing that holds the appeal for the most advanced hackers.</p>
<p>(Bernay would often tell security how to detect the Midnight Skulker just to</p>
<p>raise the game to another level.)</p>
<p> I think it was Bernay's phone-booth stickering that first</p>
<p>evoked a Pynchon vibe in me when I was reporting the story. Because, as a</p>
<p>youthful fan of Pynchon's The Crying of</p>
<p>Lot 49 , I'd done some stickering myself; I used to sticker phone booths</p>
<p>with the sign of the muted post horn, the symbol of the Trystero , the shadowy conspiratorial network in</p>
<p>Pynchon's novel. (See illustration.)</p>
<p> Anyway, entering the phone-phreak underground was like</p>
<p>entering the Trystero underground. Among many things that make The Crying of Lot 49 perhaps the great American visionary work of the</p>
<p>past century (a novel that ranks in my pantheon with Pale Fire ) is its imagination of an alternate communication system,</p>
<p>a Web uniting the disaffected, the disillusioned and the just plain disgruntled</p>
<p>in America. The outsiders who no longer trusted their private dreams and</p>
<p>longings to the official public channels of communication (like the post office</p>
<p>and the phone company). A fantasied conspiracy-as-communion that took the form</p>
<p>of an underground postal system. A vision that took as its sign and symbol "the</p>
<p>muted posthorn," the symbol of  Thurn</p>
<p>and Taxis, the ancient European private postal service-with a mute silencing</p>
<p>it.</p>
<p> Curiously, "mute" was</p>
<p>the phone-phreak term for one of their key artifacts, a skeleton-key device to</p>
<p>generate the 2,600-cycle-per-second tone that put the phone company's</p>
<p>long-distance signaling system at their command. Coincidence? Were the phone</p>
<p>phreaks life imitating (Pynchon's) art? Or was Pynchon's art anticipating,</p>
<p>prophesizing life? I don't think it's just me seeing things through the lens of</p>
<p>Pynchon; I think it's Pynchon foreseeing</p>
<p>things. Foreseeing, as he put it in the novel, "a network by which x number of Americans are truly</p>
<p>communicating … among a web of telephone wires … searching ceaselessly among</p>
<p>the dial's ten million possibilities for that magical Other who will reveal</p>
<p>herself out of the roar of relays." Sound familiar?</p>
<p> But there was one particularly spooky foresight or</p>
<p>foreshadowing that floored me: "the lawyer Metzger." As I was talking to the</p>
<p>documentary producer about the origin of my odyssey in a lawyer named Metzger,</p>
<p>it suddenly struck me: Wait a minute, wasn't there a lawyer named Metzger in The Crying of Lot 49 ?</p>
<p> I raced home and dug out my copy of the novel. There it was,</p>
<p>on page 17: Oedipa Maas, Pynchon's heroine, receives a summons from the estate</p>
<p>of a deceased lover, Pierce Inverarity. She is to be the executrix of his</p>
<p>tangled last will and testament, a labyrinthine legacy embedded, encoded in the</p>
<p>circuit board of the new American landscape.</p>
<p> She checks into the Echo Court motel in the San Francisco</p>
<p>suburb of San Narciso, and "That night the lawyer Metzger showed up." Her</p>
<p>guide. I won't dwell much further on the fictional lawyer Metzger himself, or</p>
<p>the fact that he turns out to be the former child actor Baby Igor, or on one of</p>
<p>the all-time great seduction scenes in American literature (one that also</p>
<p>serves as a metaphor for the veiling and unveiling of Truth!), the one that</p>
<p>ensues when Metzger and Oedipa watch a Baby ­Igor movie on the motel-room TV.</p>
<p>Except to say that, in very much the same way that a lawyer named Metzger was</p>
<p>my connection to the underworld realm, "the lawyer Metzger" is the one who</p>
<p>connects Pynchon's heroine to the shadowy Trystero underground. Coincidence?</p>
<p> One of the persistent concerns of The Crying of Lot 49 is the nature of coincidence. How does one</p>
<p>distinguish accident and chance from pattern and plan, signal from noise, order</p>
<p>from randomness, conspiracy from paranoia-in physics, in history, in human</p>
<p>consciousness?</p>
<p> I won't detain you with any further meditations on this</p>
<p>subject (not now, anyway), but the coincidence of the fictional and factual</p>
<p>"lawyer Metzger" both serving as Vergilian guides to an underworld labyrinth is</p>
<p>(as I believe Martin Heidegger put it in his famous Marburg seminar on</p>
<p>Heraclitus and the pre-Socratics) "pretty freaky, dude."</p>
<p> But I do want to talk about the vision of The Crying of Lot 49 and its embodiment</p>
<p>in the ideals of enlightened phreaks and hackers as a political vision. I'd contend they are the true opposition party in American culture, or at least the smartest</p>
<p>one. They have a far more knowing and savvy critique of technological totalism</p>
<p>than postmodernists,post-Marxistsand ­cultural-studies savants, all of whom are</p>
<p>in thrall to totalizing ideological systems even as they purport to critique</p>
<p>such systems.</p>
<p> They-my guys, the Pynchonian underground-are the ultimate</p>
<p>opposition to systemization. But theirs is not, I repeat, not a Luddite critique. These guys love the possibilities of technology; they love systems and they</p>
<p>love to fuck with systems. (Fuck with them like lovers.) They know that systems</p>
<p>tend to become stagnant, oppressive and totalitarian unless they're fucked</p>
<p>with. That they only evolve under the pressure that punctures their</p>
<p>self-confidence.</p>
<p> But I would argue that my party, the Pynchon-Crunch</p>
<p>opposition, are more than political-they're also a philosophical opposition.</p>
<p>Although Captain Crunch may not immediately strike one as a philosopher in the</p>
<p>mode of Aristotle or Kant, the cyber-­hackers can be seen as descendants of the</p>
<p>Skeptics, the ones who ­refute the pretenses of the overconfident</p>
<p>system-builders.</p>
<p> Perhaps (like all great lifelong passions) my predilection</p>
<p>for cyber skeptics can be traced back to high school. It was in high school</p>
<p>that I read Pynchon, and it was in high school that I was engaged in a friendly</p>
<p>rivalry with a tech-minded classmate named Bob Metcalfe, who later went on to</p>
<p>become a legendary cyber-world system-builder and theorist: He invented</p>
<p>Ethernet and "Metcalfe's Law" ("the value of a network grows by the square of</p>
<p>the size of the network"-is this a real law of science or a clever Ethernet</p>
<p>promotion?). Mr. Metcalfe is a terrifically good-natured techno-optimist of the</p>
<p>George Gilder school, and I have great respect for his achievements. But after</p>
<p>high school we went our separate ways, and I cast my lot with the anti-system</p>
<p>skeptics-the losers, the left-out, the lost causes, the disillusioned and the</p>
<p>disappointed, the doomed Romantic visionaries. But we've got Captain Crunch and</p>
<p>Thomas Pynchon on our side.</p>
<p> Endnote: It occurred to me that this is what I was getting</p>
<p>at a few months ago when I announced the formation of The Edgy Alliance: a</p>
<p>Trystero-like linkage of kindred spirits. And so I'd like to open the</p>
<p>membership rolls again and ask any who want to join the nearly 300 Edgy Allies</p>
<p>to whom I've already sent membership cards, to send their name and address (and</p>
<p>also suggested column topics) to The Edgy Alliance, Box 105, 577 Second Avenue,</p>
<p>New York, N.Y. 10016. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2001/02/pynchon-and-crunch-heroes-of-the-underworld-wide-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
