<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; In Defense of Julia&#8217;s Oscar Nod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2001/04/in-defense-of-julias-oscar-nod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>In Defense of Julia&#8217;s Oscar Nod</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2001/04/in-defense-of-julias-oscar-nod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2001/04/in-defense-of-julias-oscar-nod/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Haskell</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2001/04/in-defense-of-julias-oscar-nod/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Life these days is such a cacophony of self-interest groups,</p>
<p>screaming their points of view in a dialogue of the deaf, that it's balm for</p>
<p>the soul when everybody shuts up for a minute and listens. The occasion for</p>
<p>this pause in the day's ululation was a film series at the Brooklyn Academy of</p>
<p>Music called Screening Through Prejudice .</p>
<p>I had agreed to appear on a panel following a morning showing of John Ford's The Searchers , and as the event drew</p>
<p>nigh, I experienced mounting trepidation. Ford's epic Western featuring John</p>
<p>Wayne as a racist avenger on the warpath after murderous Comanches was only</p>
<p>recently admitted to the pantheon of masterpieces, and has never been either a</p>
<p>general critical favorite or a crowd-pleaser.</p>
<p> Westerns have always been a tough sell, and when I heard the</p>
<p>audience would be a group of New York City high school kids, mostly minority, I</p>
<p>feared the worst. How would young people who had probably never seen a Western</p>
<p>even comprehend such a film? The idea for the series, as exemplified in films</p>
<p>like Imitation of Life and Gentlemen's Agreement , was to focus on</p>
<p>images of discrimination. It was a noble idea, except when it came to a great</p>
<p>and difficult film about which one has mixed feelings, and whose artistry can't</p>
<p>be made to fit a political agenda.</p>
<p> The smart and scintillating Margo Jefferson was to appear</p>
<p>with me, and I'm sure we both wondered ahead of time how these kids would even</p>
<p>sit still for a movie that was not just a Western, but one that had baffled the</p>
<p>critics of its time (1956) with its gargantuan ambition-an "action" film that</p>
<p>was a full two hours long, as deliberately slow and cosmic as the turning of</p>
<p>the earth that becomes the film's reigning visual metaphor. Seasons change,</p>
<p>years come and go, failure succeeds weary failure, families and tribes are</p>
<p>decimated, children grow up.</p>
<p> We needn't have worried. Oh, yes, there was a good deal of</p>
<p>restlessness and giggling at the beginning, but gradually the room quieted</p>
<p>down. The 100 or 150 kids laughed at Ford's boisterous humor-nothing too broad</p>
<p>for them-and held their breath at the drama: They knew a good story when they</p>
<p>saw one. They responded to the generational and racial tensions within the</p>
<p>family: the hostility of Ethan (Wayne) toward Martin (Jeffrey Hunter), the</p>
<p>part-Cherokee boy adopted by Ethan's family when his parents were killed by</p>
<p>Comanches; the weakness of Aaron (Walter Coy) alongside his alpha-male-type</p>
<p>brother; the children's adoration of Ethan; the arguments over staying and</p>
<p>trying to develop the land versus moving on in defeat. The kids also responded</p>
<p>to old Mose Harper, Hank Worden's holy fool of an Indian scout. And, as emerged</p>
<p>in the question period after, they even loved Look (Beulah Archuletta), a.k.a.</p>
<p>Wild Goose Flying in the Night Sky, the squaw Martin mistakenly marries and</p>
<p>whom at one point he boots down a hill. Where we adults only cringed at the</p>
<p>reflexive gesture of ruling-class cruelty, the kids saw the racism but also</p>
<p>something more-the brown woman's appealing dignity and warmth, her proud</p>
<p>Indianness and even her loyalty to her tomfool of a husband-and they felt the</p>
<p>mysterious void she leaves when she disappears.</p>
<p> My eyes were opened, too. I began to see Vera Miles'</p>
<p>sometimes shrill unmarried lady as something more than comic relief at the</p>
<p>expense of a desperate woman, more than simply the embodiment of Ford's archaic</p>
<p>Irish-Catholic view of women. She loves Martin, but if he won't come home and</p>
<p>settle down, she'll tie the knot with the impossible Charlie. In the context,</p>
<p>she's the female counterpart of the male warrior. Far from the little woman who</p>
<p>waits passively, she's fighting for her life, or rather for the life of the</p>
<p>tribe, through the only means at her disposal: through husband and family. We</p>
<p>may question this view of the settling of America as White Man's Destiny, but</p>
<p>as ritualized in the Western it's a woman's job to marry and procreate as sure</p>
<p>as it's Ethan's job to fight Indians.</p>
<p> The kids understood the good and bad in Ethan, the mixture</p>
<p>of fanaticism and heroism. In his sardonic refrain, "That'll be the day," they</p>
<p>heard Eastwood's emulative "Make my day," a gauntlet thrown down by the super-cool</p>
<p>dude, but in this case one who, eaten up by hate, has nothing left when that</p>
<p>hate ebbs away. In the end, Wayne's sand-gravel voice has slowed down to a</p>
<p>reluctant drawl; it's as if, for Ethan, there's hardly a soul on whom it's</p>
<p>worth expending the energy it takes to talk. Ironically, his communion is not</p>
<p>with his own kind but, mystically, with the man for whom he saves all his bile</p>
<p>and force: his arch-enemy Scar, the Indian chief whose presence he intuits,</p>
<p>whose scalp he seeks.</p>
<p> There were various opinions as to the enigmatic ending, but</p>
<p>most felt it meant that Ethan's (and Wayne's) time is over, as Ford, too, must</p>
<p>have felt when he has old Mose anoint Martin, man of moderation and ethnically</p>
<p>mixed heritage, as leader of the younger generation. Watching the film with</p>
<p>these kids, I felt excited all over again, reinvigorated in my admiration for</p>
<p>Ford's majestic work.</p>
<p> When I had returned home that afternoon, I got a call from a</p>
<p>reporter from the Los Angeles Times</p>
<p>who was doing a front-page story on Julia Roberts to run the day after the</p>
<p>Oscars, on the almost certain supposition that she would win the award for best</p>
<p>actress. Was this some kind of radical breakthrough, the reporter wanted to</p>
<p>know, for a star as popular and gorgeous as Ms. Roberts to win an award usually</p>
<p>reserved for "serious" performers-i.e. thespians of less pulchritude and charm,</p>
<p>and more obvious signs of hard work and self-transformation?</p>
<p> The question presented the false dichotomy between</p>
<p>personality and talent. People complain that a certain star-John Wayne or Julia</p>
<p>Roberts-is just playing him- or herself, when in fact there are subtle</p>
<p>modulations in the persona that become apparent only with time, when we've</p>
<p>gotten far enough away from the spell of their presence to evaluate the discipline</p>
<p>and artistry involved. As with Wayne, the sheer number of good films Ms.</p>
<p>Roberts has made should tell us something-that she makes others look good,</p>
<p>listens more eloquently than most people speak, gives of herself, risks charges</p>
<p>of repetition and self-parody.</p>
<p> John Wayne won an Oscar, at the very end of his career, for True Grit . Now that Julia Roberts has</p>
<p>one while she's young and dazzling, it would be nice to think that those old</p>
<p>high culture–low culture barriers have sufficiently melted away so that we can</p>
<p>appreciate prestidigitations of cinematic magic when they occur.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life these days is such a cacophony of self-interest groups,</p>
<p>screaming their points of view in a dialogue of the deaf, that it's balm for</p>
<p>the soul when everybody shuts up for a minute and listens. The occasion for</p>
<p>this pause in the day's ululation was a film series at the Brooklyn Academy of</p>
<p>Music called Screening Through Prejudice .</p>
<p>I had agreed to appear on a panel following a morning showing of John Ford's The Searchers , and as the event drew</p>
<p>nigh, I experienced mounting trepidation. Ford's epic Western featuring John</p>
<p>Wayne as a racist avenger on the warpath after murderous Comanches was only</p>
<p>recently admitted to the pantheon of masterpieces, and has never been either a</p>
<p>general critical favorite or a crowd-pleaser.</p>
<p> Westerns have always been a tough sell, and when I heard the</p>
<p>audience would be a group of New York City high school kids, mostly minority, I</p>
<p>feared the worst. How would young people who had probably never seen a Western</p>
<p>even comprehend such a film? The idea for the series, as exemplified in films</p>
<p>like Imitation of Life and Gentlemen's Agreement , was to focus on</p>
<p>images of discrimination. It was a noble idea, except when it came to a great</p>
<p>and difficult film about which one has mixed feelings, and whose artistry can't</p>
<p>be made to fit a political agenda.</p>
<p> The smart and scintillating Margo Jefferson was to appear</p>
<p>with me, and I'm sure we both wondered ahead of time how these kids would even</p>
<p>sit still for a movie that was not just a Western, but one that had baffled the</p>
<p>critics of its time (1956) with its gargantuan ambition-an "action" film that</p>
<p>was a full two hours long, as deliberately slow and cosmic as the turning of</p>
<p>the earth that becomes the film's reigning visual metaphor. Seasons change,</p>
<p>years come and go, failure succeeds weary failure, families and tribes are</p>
<p>decimated, children grow up.</p>
<p> We needn't have worried. Oh, yes, there was a good deal of</p>
<p>restlessness and giggling at the beginning, but gradually the room quieted</p>
<p>down. The 100 or 150 kids laughed at Ford's boisterous humor-nothing too broad</p>
<p>for them-and held their breath at the drama: They knew a good story when they</p>
<p>saw one. They responded to the generational and racial tensions within the</p>
<p>family: the hostility of Ethan (Wayne) toward Martin (Jeffrey Hunter), the</p>
<p>part-Cherokee boy adopted by Ethan's family when his parents were killed by</p>
<p>Comanches; the weakness of Aaron (Walter Coy) alongside his alpha-male-type</p>
<p>brother; the children's adoration of Ethan; the arguments over staying and</p>
<p>trying to develop the land versus moving on in defeat. The kids also responded</p>
<p>to old Mose Harper, Hank Worden's holy fool of an Indian scout. And, as emerged</p>
<p>in the question period after, they even loved Look (Beulah Archuletta), a.k.a.</p>
<p>Wild Goose Flying in the Night Sky, the squaw Martin mistakenly marries and</p>
<p>whom at one point he boots down a hill. Where we adults only cringed at the</p>
<p>reflexive gesture of ruling-class cruelty, the kids saw the racism but also</p>
<p>something more-the brown woman's appealing dignity and warmth, her proud</p>
<p>Indianness and even her loyalty to her tomfool of a husband-and they felt the</p>
<p>mysterious void she leaves when she disappears.</p>
<p> My eyes were opened, too. I began to see Vera Miles'</p>
<p>sometimes shrill unmarried lady as something more than comic relief at the</p>
<p>expense of a desperate woman, more than simply the embodiment of Ford's archaic</p>
<p>Irish-Catholic view of women. She loves Martin, but if he won't come home and</p>
<p>settle down, she'll tie the knot with the impossible Charlie. In the context,</p>
<p>she's the female counterpart of the male warrior. Far from the little woman who</p>
<p>waits passively, she's fighting for her life, or rather for the life of the</p>
<p>tribe, through the only means at her disposal: through husband and family. We</p>
<p>may question this view of the settling of America as White Man's Destiny, but</p>
<p>as ritualized in the Western it's a woman's job to marry and procreate as sure</p>
<p>as it's Ethan's job to fight Indians.</p>
<p> The kids understood the good and bad in Ethan, the mixture</p>
<p>of fanaticism and heroism. In his sardonic refrain, "That'll be the day," they</p>
<p>heard Eastwood's emulative "Make my day," a gauntlet thrown down by the super-cool</p>
<p>dude, but in this case one who, eaten up by hate, has nothing left when that</p>
<p>hate ebbs away. In the end, Wayne's sand-gravel voice has slowed down to a</p>
<p>reluctant drawl; it's as if, for Ethan, there's hardly a soul on whom it's</p>
<p>worth expending the energy it takes to talk. Ironically, his communion is not</p>
<p>with his own kind but, mystically, with the man for whom he saves all his bile</p>
<p>and force: his arch-enemy Scar, the Indian chief whose presence he intuits,</p>
<p>whose scalp he seeks.</p>
<p> There were various opinions as to the enigmatic ending, but</p>
<p>most felt it meant that Ethan's (and Wayne's) time is over, as Ford, too, must</p>
<p>have felt when he has old Mose anoint Martin, man of moderation and ethnically</p>
<p>mixed heritage, as leader of the younger generation. Watching the film with</p>
<p>these kids, I felt excited all over again, reinvigorated in my admiration for</p>
<p>Ford's majestic work.</p>
<p> When I had returned home that afternoon, I got a call from a</p>
<p>reporter from the Los Angeles Times</p>
<p>who was doing a front-page story on Julia Roberts to run the day after the</p>
<p>Oscars, on the almost certain supposition that she would win the award for best</p>
<p>actress. Was this some kind of radical breakthrough, the reporter wanted to</p>
<p>know, for a star as popular and gorgeous as Ms. Roberts to win an award usually</p>
<p>reserved for "serious" performers-i.e. thespians of less pulchritude and charm,</p>
<p>and more obvious signs of hard work and self-transformation?</p>
<p> The question presented the false dichotomy between</p>
<p>personality and talent. People complain that a certain star-John Wayne or Julia</p>
<p>Roberts-is just playing him- or herself, when in fact there are subtle</p>
<p>modulations in the persona that become apparent only with time, when we've</p>
<p>gotten far enough away from the spell of their presence to evaluate the discipline</p>
<p>and artistry involved. As with Wayne, the sheer number of good films Ms.</p>
<p>Roberts has made should tell us something-that she makes others look good,</p>
<p>listens more eloquently than most people speak, gives of herself, risks charges</p>
<p>of repetition and self-parody.</p>
<p> John Wayne won an Oscar, at the very end of his career, for True Grit . Now that Julia Roberts has</p>
<p>one while she's young and dazzling, it would be nice to think that those old</p>
<p>high culture–low culture barriers have sufficiently melted away so that we can</p>
<p>appreciate prestidigitations of cinematic magic when they occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2001/04/in-defense-of-julias-oscar-nod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
