<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; A Piece Offering: Vanity Fair Chief Bids for Old Foe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2002/04/a-piece-offering-vanity-fair-chief-bids-for-old-foe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>A Piece Offering: Vanity Fair Chief Bids for Old Foe</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2002/04/a-piece-offering-vanity-fair-chief-bids-for-old-foe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2002/04/a-piece-offering-vanity-fair-chief-bids-for-old-foe/</link>
			<dc:creator>Sridhar Pappu</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2002/04/a-piece-offering-vanity-fair-chief-bids-for-old-foe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ten years ago, a red-hot Tina Brown left Vanity Fair   to become the editor of The New Yorker .</p>
<p>One decade and one failed magazine later , Vanity Fair wants Ms. Brown</p>
<p>back.</p>
<p> Representatives for Ms. Brown and Vanity Fair told Off the Record</p>
<p>that Ms. Brown has been asked to write a column for the same publicationshe</p>
<p>reinvigorated during the 1980's and tried to challenge with Talk in the</p>
<p>late 1990's. A spokesperson for Vanity Fair said Ms. Brown's successor</p>
<p>at the magazine, Graydon Carter, had approached Ms. Brown in February through</p>
<p>Reinaldo Herrera, a Vanity Fair contributing editor and the husband of</p>
<p>designer Carolina Herrera.</p>
<p> She said she's still figuring out plans," the spokesperson said, "and will</p>
<p>let us know."  </p>
<p> Neither Ms. Brown nor Mr. Carter was available for comment. But the Vanity</p>
<p>Fair   spokesperson said the column</p>
<p>would most probably be in the same vein as "Tina Brown's Diary," a monthly</p>
<p>series Ms. Brown penned in her last months as editor in chief at Talk .</p>
<p>Writing with a light, occasionally devilish touch, Ms. Brown used the "Diary"</p>
<p>to muse on subjects like Sept. 11, but also to settle scores-notably taking on Tina</p>
<p>and Harry Come to America: Tina Brown, Harry Evans, and the Uses of Power ,</p>
<p>the tell-all biography of her and husband Harry Evans, written by Vanity</p>
<p>Fair contributing editor Judy Bachrach. "The first half of the book is all</p>
<p>about my breasts," Ms. Brown wrote, referring to Ms. Bachrach's book as "Bio</p>
<p>Porn."</p>
<p> Following Talk 's demise in January, Ms. Brown's diaries-which she</p>
<p>says she's kept since she was 12-became the focus of outside speculation, with</p>
<p>some suggesting they'd be the basis for a lucrative book deal. However, Ms.</p>
<p>Brown dismissed that notion, telling The Observer at the time: "I think</p>
<p>my diary will be something [that,] when I'm 75, when the bailiffs are taking my</p>
<p>furniture out, I'll cash in then."</p>
<p> Ms. Brown's return to Vanity Fair as a columnist would be</p>
<p>strange-akin to David Caruso coming back to NYPD Blue as a desk</p>
<p>sergeant. After all, Vanity Fair might have died in 1984 had it not been</p>
<p>for Ms. Brown, the Tatler editor who took over the magazine at the</p>
<p>behest of Condé Nast's Si Newhouse and gave it its unique</p>
<p>celebrity-and-society-driven Weltanschauung . Ms. Brown became the first</p>
<p>of a new generation of celebrity editors.</p>
<p> Rejoining Vanity Fair , Ms. Brown would rekindle a relationship with</p>
<p>Condé Nast that ended when she left The New Yorker to start Talk</p>
<p>with Hearst and Miramax in 1998.</p>
<p> "If she was going to write a column in America," the Vanity Fair</p>
<p>spokesperson said in explaining the overture, " Vanity Fair is a logical</p>
<p>place to do it.</p>
<p> And when asked if the magazine felt any hesitancy about inviting Ms. Brown</p>
<p>back to the fold, the Vanity Fair spokesperson said, "Not at all. It</p>
<p>seemed like a natural and logical thing to do."</p>
<p> However, Vanity Fair may have to get in line. Ms. Brown was on</p>
<p>vacation this week, but a Talk-Miramax Books spokesperson said the ex-editor</p>
<p>had also received inquires about writing such a column from Salon, Slate, The</p>
<p>New York Times Magazine and The New York Sun .</p>
<p> Adam Moss, editor of The Times Magazine , declined to comment, and</p>
<p>Seth Lipsky, editor of The Sun , did not return calls seeking comment.</p>
<p>Likewise, Salon editor in chief David Talbot and representatives from Slate did</p>
<p>not respond to e-mails from Off the Record. </p>
<p> -Sridhar</p>
<p>Pappu</p>
<p> No one ever said Bonnie Fuller was going to have an easy time righting the</p>
<p>ship at US Weekly , Jann Wenner's entry into the hyper-competitive</p>
<p>supermarket magazine fray.</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller has been on the job for less than a month, and while Wenner</p>
<p>Media executives say they're thrilled with her progress with the weekly</p>
<p>title-especially her results in newsstand sales-the staff Ms. Fuller inherited</p>
<p>at US Weekly is seriously cranky and badly in need of some shuteye.</p>
<p> Among the US Weekly staff grievances: Ms. Fuller only looks at</p>
<p>hard-copy page proofs and has a penchant for tearing up the book at the last</p>
<p>moment. That leads to their biggest complaint: that the magazine's closing</p>
<p>times under Ms. Fuller have been brutal, stretching first into the wee hours of</p>
<p>the morning and then, in two subsequent issues, plain old morning .</p>
<p> There have already been some top staff departures since Ms. Fuller took</p>
<p>over. So far, two editors-managing editor Maura Fritz and assistant managing</p>
<p>editor Chad Anderson-have quit US Weekly . Mr. Anderson is moving to</p>
<p>Virginia to work at Richmond magazine, while Ms. Fritz quit without her</p>
<p>next job lined up. Ms. Fritz said that she quit because US Weekly is</p>
<p>"going in a direction that I'm not particularly comfortable with." Mr. Anderson</p>
<p>had no comment.</p>
<p> p&gt;&gt;Ms. Fuller, the former editor of Glamour and Cosmopolitan, came</p>
<p>to US Weekly after the previous editor, Terry McDonell, left to go run Sports</p>
<p>Illustrated .</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller has her defenders, too. Some at Wenner told Off the Record that</p>
<p>the disgruntled US staffers are merely loyalists to the regime of Mr.</p>
<p>McDonell and editor Charlie Leehrsen, who also left for Sports Illustrated after</p>
<p>he was passed over for the top job at US Weekly . According to these Wenner</p>
<p>sources, these critics are unwilling to give Ms. Fuller a chance.</p>
<p> But the gripers said their beefs with Ms. Fuller are not just the standard</p>
<p>old-staff moaning that happens whenever a new editor comes aboard.</p>
<p> "I don't think people were so in love with the previous regime that any new</p>
<p>editor would have had a hard time," said one. "Who cares who runs the magazine</p>
<p>as long as they run it well? I don't care who likes who-it's just about trying</p>
<p>to get your job done."</p>
<p> These sources said the principal problem was that Ms. Fuller-a veteran of</p>
<p>monthlies-was still adjusting to the weekly deadlines at US Weekly . "She</p>
<p>doesn't get the pace," said one US Weekly staffer. "With a weekly, you</p>
<p>always have to move forward. And with any page, she's likely to rip it up at the</p>
<p>last minute."</p>
<p> But Ms. Fuller chalked up the difficulties to the typical growing pains of</p>
<p>any new editor taking over.</p>
<p> "Whenever there's some change in routine and a new person in charge, some</p>
<p>of those things can take a little longer," Ms. Fuller said. "Everybody's got to</p>
<p>get used to some changes in their routine, but I don't expect that's going to</p>
<p>be a continual thing."</p>
<p> But US Weekly 's late closings are getting on some nerves. Before Ms.</p>
<p>Fuller, the magazine would usually wrap up Mondays at midnight, but after a 3</p>
<p>a.m. close on March 11, US Weekly staffers set up an office pool on when</p>
<p>the issue would ship to the printer the next week. One staffer picked 7 a.m., a</p>
<p>guess which was roundly called "crazy" by other staffers.</p>
<p> They were all wrong. That US Weekly -which carried a cover line</p>
<p>"Britney &amp; Justin: It's Over"-went to the printers on March 18 at 7:45</p>
<p>a.m., sources said. No winner was awarded and the pool carried over to the</p>
<p>March 25 close, with entries stretching as late as 11 a.m.. This time, the staff</p>
<p>overbid: US Weekly closed its March 25 Oscars issue around 9 a.m.,</p>
<p>staffers said.</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller said she hopes that things will get better. "I don't want to be</p>
<p>here all night," she said on the evening of March 25. "I think we may have some</p>
<p>more late closes, but I don't expect it to go on for a huge length of time. For</p>
<p>instance, we're closing Oscars-and Oscars is always a late close, and</p>
<p>everyone's prepared for that."</p>
<p> Janice Min, a former editor at People and InStyle who was</p>
<p>recently hired by Ms. Fuller as her executive editor at US Weekly , said</p>
<p>that if there was confusion among staff, it wasn't the new editor in chief's</p>
<p>fault.</p>
<p> "With Bonnie, you leave her office after discussing a story with no</p>
<p>confusion about what she wants a story to be," Ms. Min said in a phone call</p>
<p>from Uruguay, where she's on vacation. "And that's a real skill in a leader."</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller said she has yet to complete her staff hiring. In addition to</p>
<p>Ms. Min, Ms. Fuller has brought in two editors on a temporary basis: Susan</p>
<p>Wyland, former managing editor of Real Simple , and Erick Levin.</p>
<p> "They're pinch-hitting," Ms. Fuller said. "There are a couple open</p>
<p>positions and I need to take some time to fill them, but I could use some extra</p>
<p>help in the meantime."</p>
<p> Some of Ms. Fuller's critics inside US Weekly acknowledged that the</p>
<p>new editor does possess a touch that the magazine needs. The true secret of</p>
<p>commercial success for US Weekly  is keeping newsstand sales up, they said-and they pointed to Ms.</p>
<p>Fuller's track record of writing catchy cover lines that appeal to US Weekly 's</p>
<p>audience, which is nearly two-thirds women.</p>
<p> " US Weekly was a magazine mostly for women, top-edited by men who</p>
<p>never liked the subject and who don't really like women very much at this stage</p>
<p>of their lives," said a staffer. "Bonnie Fuller gets it. She gets celebrities,</p>
<p>the fashion, the women's audience that is already there. At least she watches</p>
<p>TV and thinks The Osbournes are cool."</p>
<p> The disgruntled US Weekly staff will find little sympathy from</p>
<p>Wenner Media senior vice president Kent Brownridge, who said the company was</p>
<p>very pleased with Ms. Fuller, since her early issues have posted  positive numbers. Mr. Brownridge said that</p>
<p>the first three issues under Ms. Fuller have averaged sales of 393,000 on the</p>
<p>newsstands. If she can keep the same pace, that would be a 21 percent increase</p>
<p>over the 325,000 single-copy sales average for the last six months of 2001.</p>
<p>"She's doing exceedingly well, numbers-wise," Mr. Brownridge said.</p>
<p> And if that means US Weekly 's staff is losing sleep, so be it, said</p>
<p>Mr. Brownridge .</p>
<p> "The old regime didn't like to work on weekends and liked to go home early</p>
<p>on Monday night," Mr. Brownridge said. "We're going to get the latest, best,</p>
<p>juiciest bit of celebrity news in there, and if we have to stay up on Monday</p>
<p>night, so be it."</p>
<p> -Gabriel</p>
<p>Snyder with Sridhar Pappu</p>
<p> Fresh from the Oscar whirlwind, Variety /i&gt;&gt;  editor in chief Peter Bart had a question: "How many hands can</p>
<p>you aspire to shake in 48 hours?"</p>
<p> That wasn't our question, however. Off the Record called to ask Mr. Bart if</p>
<p>he was planning to retire.</p>
<p> In his 11 years as editor in chief of Hollywood's paper of record, Mr.</p>
<p>Bart, 69, has become an undisputed if controversial power player, well known</p>
<p>for his hands-on approach to Variety . When angry people call Variety</p>
<p>reporters, a stock excuse is that Mr. Bart added the offending bit.</p>
<p> But during the 48-hour Hollywood cocktail party that is Oscars weekend, a</p>
<p>rumor spread that Mr. Bart was considering, and may in fact be planning, to</p>
<p>give up some of his control at Variety .</p>
<p> Three sources close to the principals told Off the Record that Tad Smith,</p>
<p>president of the media division at Cahners, the company that owns Variety ,</p>
<p>was recently talking to former staffer Martin Peers, now media reporter at The</p>
<p>Wall Street Journal , about moving back to Variety for a high-level</p>
<p>position.</p>
<p> The job Mr. Smith had in mind, the sources said, was the No. 2 position at Variety .</p>
<p>Mr. Bart would retain the title of editor in chief-and thereby his place in</p>
<p>Hollywood royalty-but Mr. Peers, a former Variety New York bureau chief,</p>
<p>would be responsible for managing the paper on a day-to-day basis.</p>
<p> But the discussions fell apart when Mr. Peers turned down the job, sources</p>
<p>said. One source said that once Mr. Peers began talking to Mr. Bart, the latter</p>
<p>described the job not as top editor in Los Angeles, but as an executive</p>
<p>position in New York.</p>
<p> Whatever happened, none of the three principals would talk about it now,</p>
<p>except to say that everyone is happy where they are.</p>
<p> Mr. Peers said, "I'm not going back to Variety ." Mr. Smith confirmed</p>
<p>that he and Mr. Peers recently had breakfast but wouldn't say what they</p>
<p>discussed. Of Mr. Bart, he said: "He's doing a fantastic job. We're not</p>
<p>recruiting for any particular job- and if we were, it would be Peter's job to</p>
<p>recruit."</p>
<p> Mr. Smith and Mr. Bart have had their issues. It was Mr. Smith who</p>
<p>suspended Mr. Bart last August, after Mr. Bart was quoted making derogatory</p>
<p>comments in a Los Angeles magazine profile.</p>
<p> Asked if he was nearing retirement, Mr. Bart said he was not. "I intend to</p>
<p>continue in my role as per usual," he said.</p>
<p> -G.S.</p>
<p> Pete Hamill, meet the SPACE.man! According to sources at the Daily News ,</p>
<p>the tabloid is closing in on hiring Lou Dobbs, the host of CNN's Moneyline</p>
<p>and the former face man of SPACE.com, to write a weekly financial-news column.</p>
<p>Negotiations between Mr. Dobbs and the News began with an overture from</p>
<p>the paper's business editor, David Andelman, and a deal appears close, sources</p>
<p>said. On Tuesday, March 26, Mr. Dobbs, Mr. Andelman and news editor Ed Kosner</p>
<p>were seen having lunch at the Four Seasons.</p>
<p> News</p>
<p>editor Ed Kosner did not return a call seeking comment.</p>
<p>Mr. Andelman and a spokesperson for the News declined to comment. A</p>
<p>spokesperson for Mr. Dobbs at CNN said that "CNN did not dispute" that the two</p>
<p>sides were speaking, but declined to comment further.</p>
<p> -S.P. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten years ago, a red-hot Tina Brown left Vanity Fair   to become the editor of The New Yorker .</p>
<p>One decade and one failed magazine later , Vanity Fair wants Ms. Brown</p>
<p>back.</p>
<p> Representatives for Ms. Brown and Vanity Fair told Off the Record</p>
<p>that Ms. Brown has been asked to write a column for the same publicationshe</p>
<p>reinvigorated during the 1980's and tried to challenge with Talk in the</p>
<p>late 1990's. A spokesperson for Vanity Fair said Ms. Brown's successor</p>
<p>at the magazine, Graydon Carter, had approached Ms. Brown in February through</p>
<p>Reinaldo Herrera, a Vanity Fair contributing editor and the husband of</p>
<p>designer Carolina Herrera.</p>
<p> She said she's still figuring out plans," the spokesperson said, "and will</p>
<p>let us know."  </p>
<p> Neither Ms. Brown nor Mr. Carter was available for comment. But the Vanity</p>
<p>Fair   spokesperson said the column</p>
<p>would most probably be in the same vein as "Tina Brown's Diary," a monthly</p>
<p>series Ms. Brown penned in her last months as editor in chief at Talk .</p>
<p>Writing with a light, occasionally devilish touch, Ms. Brown used the "Diary"</p>
<p>to muse on subjects like Sept. 11, but also to settle scores-notably taking on Tina</p>
<p>and Harry Come to America: Tina Brown, Harry Evans, and the Uses of Power ,</p>
<p>the tell-all biography of her and husband Harry Evans, written by Vanity</p>
<p>Fair contributing editor Judy Bachrach. "The first half of the book is all</p>
<p>about my breasts," Ms. Brown wrote, referring to Ms. Bachrach's book as "Bio</p>
<p>Porn."</p>
<p> Following Talk 's demise in January, Ms. Brown's diaries-which she</p>
<p>says she's kept since she was 12-became the focus of outside speculation, with</p>
<p>some suggesting they'd be the basis for a lucrative book deal. However, Ms.</p>
<p>Brown dismissed that notion, telling The Observer at the time: "I think</p>
<p>my diary will be something [that,] when I'm 75, when the bailiffs are taking my</p>
<p>furniture out, I'll cash in then."</p>
<p> Ms. Brown's return to Vanity Fair as a columnist would be</p>
<p>strange-akin to David Caruso coming back to NYPD Blue as a desk</p>
<p>sergeant. After all, Vanity Fair might have died in 1984 had it not been</p>
<p>for Ms. Brown, the Tatler editor who took over the magazine at the</p>
<p>behest of Condé Nast's Si Newhouse and gave it its unique</p>
<p>celebrity-and-society-driven Weltanschauung . Ms. Brown became the first</p>
<p>of a new generation of celebrity editors.</p>
<p> Rejoining Vanity Fair , Ms. Brown would rekindle a relationship with</p>
<p>Condé Nast that ended when she left The New Yorker to start Talk</p>
<p>with Hearst and Miramax in 1998.</p>
<p> "If she was going to write a column in America," the Vanity Fair</p>
<p>spokesperson said in explaining the overture, " Vanity Fair is a logical</p>
<p>place to do it.</p>
<p> And when asked if the magazine felt any hesitancy about inviting Ms. Brown</p>
<p>back to the fold, the Vanity Fair spokesperson said, "Not at all. It</p>
<p>seemed like a natural and logical thing to do."</p>
<p> However, Vanity Fair may have to get in line. Ms. Brown was on</p>
<p>vacation this week, but a Talk-Miramax Books spokesperson said the ex-editor</p>
<p>had also received inquires about writing such a column from Salon, Slate, The</p>
<p>New York Times Magazine and The New York Sun .</p>
<p> Adam Moss, editor of The Times Magazine , declined to comment, and</p>
<p>Seth Lipsky, editor of The Sun , did not return calls seeking comment.</p>
<p>Likewise, Salon editor in chief David Talbot and representatives from Slate did</p>
<p>not respond to e-mails from Off the Record. </p>
<p> -Sridhar</p>
<p>Pappu</p>
<p> No one ever said Bonnie Fuller was going to have an easy time righting the</p>
<p>ship at US Weekly , Jann Wenner's entry into the hyper-competitive</p>
<p>supermarket magazine fray.</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller has been on the job for less than a month, and while Wenner</p>
<p>Media executives say they're thrilled with her progress with the weekly</p>
<p>title-especially her results in newsstand sales-the staff Ms. Fuller inherited</p>
<p>at US Weekly is seriously cranky and badly in need of some shuteye.</p>
<p> Among the US Weekly staff grievances: Ms. Fuller only looks at</p>
<p>hard-copy page proofs and has a penchant for tearing up the book at the last</p>
<p>moment. That leads to their biggest complaint: that the magazine's closing</p>
<p>times under Ms. Fuller have been brutal, stretching first into the wee hours of</p>
<p>the morning and then, in two subsequent issues, plain old morning .</p>
<p> There have already been some top staff departures since Ms. Fuller took</p>
<p>over. So far, two editors-managing editor Maura Fritz and assistant managing</p>
<p>editor Chad Anderson-have quit US Weekly . Mr. Anderson is moving to</p>
<p>Virginia to work at Richmond magazine, while Ms. Fritz quit without her</p>
<p>next job lined up. Ms. Fritz said that she quit because US Weekly is</p>
<p>"going in a direction that I'm not particularly comfortable with." Mr. Anderson</p>
<p>had no comment.</p>
<p> p&gt;&gt;Ms. Fuller, the former editor of Glamour and Cosmopolitan, came</p>
<p>to US Weekly after the previous editor, Terry McDonell, left to go run Sports</p>
<p>Illustrated .</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller has her defenders, too. Some at Wenner told Off the Record that</p>
<p>the disgruntled US staffers are merely loyalists to the regime of Mr.</p>
<p>McDonell and editor Charlie Leehrsen, who also left for Sports Illustrated after</p>
<p>he was passed over for the top job at US Weekly . According to these Wenner</p>
<p>sources, these critics are unwilling to give Ms. Fuller a chance.</p>
<p> But the gripers said their beefs with Ms. Fuller are not just the standard</p>
<p>old-staff moaning that happens whenever a new editor comes aboard.</p>
<p> "I don't think people were so in love with the previous regime that any new</p>
<p>editor would have had a hard time," said one. "Who cares who runs the magazine</p>
<p>as long as they run it well? I don't care who likes who-it's just about trying</p>
<p>to get your job done."</p>
<p> These sources said the principal problem was that Ms. Fuller-a veteran of</p>
<p>monthlies-was still adjusting to the weekly deadlines at US Weekly . "She</p>
<p>doesn't get the pace," said one US Weekly staffer. "With a weekly, you</p>
<p>always have to move forward. And with any page, she's likely to rip it up at the</p>
<p>last minute."</p>
<p> But Ms. Fuller chalked up the difficulties to the typical growing pains of</p>
<p>any new editor taking over.</p>
<p> "Whenever there's some change in routine and a new person in charge, some</p>
<p>of those things can take a little longer," Ms. Fuller said. "Everybody's got to</p>
<p>get used to some changes in their routine, but I don't expect that's going to</p>
<p>be a continual thing."</p>
<p> But US Weekly 's late closings are getting on some nerves. Before Ms.</p>
<p>Fuller, the magazine would usually wrap up Mondays at midnight, but after a 3</p>
<p>a.m. close on March 11, US Weekly staffers set up an office pool on when</p>
<p>the issue would ship to the printer the next week. One staffer picked 7 a.m., a</p>
<p>guess which was roundly called "crazy" by other staffers.</p>
<p> They were all wrong. That US Weekly -which carried a cover line</p>
<p>"Britney &amp; Justin: It's Over"-went to the printers on March 18 at 7:45</p>
<p>a.m., sources said. No winner was awarded and the pool carried over to the</p>
<p>March 25 close, with entries stretching as late as 11 a.m.. This time, the staff</p>
<p>overbid: US Weekly closed its March 25 Oscars issue around 9 a.m.,</p>
<p>staffers said.</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller said she hopes that things will get better. "I don't want to be</p>
<p>here all night," she said on the evening of March 25. "I think we may have some</p>
<p>more late closes, but I don't expect it to go on for a huge length of time. For</p>
<p>instance, we're closing Oscars-and Oscars is always a late close, and</p>
<p>everyone's prepared for that."</p>
<p> Janice Min, a former editor at People and InStyle who was</p>
<p>recently hired by Ms. Fuller as her executive editor at US Weekly , said</p>
<p>that if there was confusion among staff, it wasn't the new editor in chief's</p>
<p>fault.</p>
<p> "With Bonnie, you leave her office after discussing a story with no</p>
<p>confusion about what she wants a story to be," Ms. Min said in a phone call</p>
<p>from Uruguay, where she's on vacation. "And that's a real skill in a leader."</p>
<p> Ms. Fuller said she has yet to complete her staff hiring. In addition to</p>
<p>Ms. Min, Ms. Fuller has brought in two editors on a temporary basis: Susan</p>
<p>Wyland, former managing editor of Real Simple , and Erick Levin.</p>
<p> "They're pinch-hitting," Ms. Fuller said. "There are a couple open</p>
<p>positions and I need to take some time to fill them, but I could use some extra</p>
<p>help in the meantime."</p>
<p> Some of Ms. Fuller's critics inside US Weekly acknowledged that the</p>
<p>new editor does possess a touch that the magazine needs. The true secret of</p>
<p>commercial success for US Weekly  is keeping newsstand sales up, they said-and they pointed to Ms.</p>
<p>Fuller's track record of writing catchy cover lines that appeal to US Weekly 's</p>
<p>audience, which is nearly two-thirds women.</p>
<p> " US Weekly was a magazine mostly for women, top-edited by men who</p>
<p>never liked the subject and who don't really like women very much at this stage</p>
<p>of their lives," said a staffer. "Bonnie Fuller gets it. She gets celebrities,</p>
<p>the fashion, the women's audience that is already there. At least she watches</p>
<p>TV and thinks The Osbournes are cool."</p>
<p> The disgruntled US Weekly staff will find little sympathy from</p>
<p>Wenner Media senior vice president Kent Brownridge, who said the company was</p>
<p>very pleased with Ms. Fuller, since her early issues have posted  positive numbers. Mr. Brownridge said that</p>
<p>the first three issues under Ms. Fuller have averaged sales of 393,000 on the</p>
<p>newsstands. If she can keep the same pace, that would be a 21 percent increase</p>
<p>over the 325,000 single-copy sales average for the last six months of 2001.</p>
<p>"She's doing exceedingly well, numbers-wise," Mr. Brownridge said.</p>
<p> And if that means US Weekly 's staff is losing sleep, so be it, said</p>
<p>Mr. Brownridge .</p>
<p> "The old regime didn't like to work on weekends and liked to go home early</p>
<p>on Monday night," Mr. Brownridge said. "We're going to get the latest, best,</p>
<p>juiciest bit of celebrity news in there, and if we have to stay up on Monday</p>
<p>night, so be it."</p>
<p> -Gabriel</p>
<p>Snyder with Sridhar Pappu</p>
<p> Fresh from the Oscar whirlwind, Variety /i&gt;&gt;  editor in chief Peter Bart had a question: "How many hands can</p>
<p>you aspire to shake in 48 hours?"</p>
<p> That wasn't our question, however. Off the Record called to ask Mr. Bart if</p>
<p>he was planning to retire.</p>
<p> In his 11 years as editor in chief of Hollywood's paper of record, Mr.</p>
<p>Bart, 69, has become an undisputed if controversial power player, well known</p>
<p>for his hands-on approach to Variety . When angry people call Variety</p>
<p>reporters, a stock excuse is that Mr. Bart added the offending bit.</p>
<p> But during the 48-hour Hollywood cocktail party that is Oscars weekend, a</p>
<p>rumor spread that Mr. Bart was considering, and may in fact be planning, to</p>
<p>give up some of his control at Variety .</p>
<p> Three sources close to the principals told Off the Record that Tad Smith,</p>
<p>president of the media division at Cahners, the company that owns Variety ,</p>
<p>was recently talking to former staffer Martin Peers, now media reporter at The</p>
<p>Wall Street Journal , about moving back to Variety for a high-level</p>
<p>position.</p>
<p> The job Mr. Smith had in mind, the sources said, was the No. 2 position at Variety .</p>
<p>Mr. Bart would retain the title of editor in chief-and thereby his place in</p>
<p>Hollywood royalty-but Mr. Peers, a former Variety New York bureau chief,</p>
<p>would be responsible for managing the paper on a day-to-day basis.</p>
<p> But the discussions fell apart when Mr. Peers turned down the job, sources</p>
<p>said. One source said that once Mr. Peers began talking to Mr. Bart, the latter</p>
<p>described the job not as top editor in Los Angeles, but as an executive</p>
<p>position in New York.</p>
<p> Whatever happened, none of the three principals would talk about it now,</p>
<p>except to say that everyone is happy where they are.</p>
<p> Mr. Peers said, "I'm not going back to Variety ." Mr. Smith confirmed</p>
<p>that he and Mr. Peers recently had breakfast but wouldn't say what they</p>
<p>discussed. Of Mr. Bart, he said: "He's doing a fantastic job. We're not</p>
<p>recruiting for any particular job- and if we were, it would be Peter's job to</p>
<p>recruit."</p>
<p> Mr. Smith and Mr. Bart have had their issues. It was Mr. Smith who</p>
<p>suspended Mr. Bart last August, after Mr. Bart was quoted making derogatory</p>
<p>comments in a Los Angeles magazine profile.</p>
<p> Asked if he was nearing retirement, Mr. Bart said he was not. "I intend to</p>
<p>continue in my role as per usual," he said.</p>
<p> -G.S.</p>
<p> Pete Hamill, meet the SPACE.man! According to sources at the Daily News ,</p>
<p>the tabloid is closing in on hiring Lou Dobbs, the host of CNN's Moneyline</p>
<p>and the former face man of SPACE.com, to write a weekly financial-news column.</p>
<p>Negotiations between Mr. Dobbs and the News began with an overture from</p>
<p>the paper's business editor, David Andelman, and a deal appears close, sources</p>
<p>said. On Tuesday, March 26, Mr. Dobbs, Mr. Andelman and news editor Ed Kosner</p>
<p>were seen having lunch at the Four Seasons.</p>
<p> News</p>
<p>editor Ed Kosner did not return a call seeking comment.</p>
<p>Mr. Andelman and a spokesperson for the News declined to comment. A</p>
<p>spokesperson for Mr. Dobbs at CNN said that "CNN did not dispute" that the two</p>
<p>sides were speaking, but declined to comment further.</p>
<p> -S.P. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2002/04/a-piece-offering-vanity-fair-chief-bids-for-old-foe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
