Inauguration and Secession

The secession meme is back, courtesy, we suspect, of the president they’re inaugurating today down in Washington D.C.

The idea takes various forms: that New York City secede from the state, or from the nation. Pro-slavery types pushed it in 1861; the Mailer-Breslin campaign embraced it in 1969. City Councilman Peter Vallone has been talking about it for a while, and is at it again. This summer, New York Magazine played around with it last summer (Defense? Mitchell Moss suggests we rent the Israeli Army.) and the doubly alternative New York Press has recently turned it into a deranged crusade.

But why dance around the point? We’ve already seceded.

How much attention are you paying to the inaugural festivities? Two New Yorkers, Rudy and George, are down in Washington with their aides. But we’ve begun to suspect that they’re mostly practicing their accents, hoping to fit in.

Meanwhile, in the spirit of, say, an exiled monarchy, we’ve set up our own West Wing on the Hudson. Two Democrats of unequaled national stature, Spitzer and Hillary Clinton, occupy statewide office, and Mrs. Clinton is married to a third. Race for Attorney General looking a bit messy? Toss in a Kennedy. Meanwhile, our parochial little mayor’s race — which does not include a serious and genuine Republican candidate — is absorbing local attention.

Some take the logic of turning inward one step further. New York has little to lose from a seriously conservative presidency, goes an argument we’ve heard more than once. Liberals can sip their wine and complain about the tax cuts while they count their money, as a Times op-ed suggests today. In the meantime, the consequences of sustained conservative control of Washington are much more likely to be felt in Mississippi than in New York. That’s where most of the soldiers come from. That’s where they send the taxes they’ve been cutting. And that’s where they might outlaw abortion if Roe were overturned.

So we won’t be down in Washington today. We were asked “Why go?” by our editor and couldn’t think of a good reason.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President