Jets vs. Nets

Defenders of the Atlantic Yards community benefits agreement have long whispered that it is vastly superior to the much ballyhooed minority hiring plan hatched last February by the New York Jets for the football team’s ill-fated West Side stadium. The Real Estate just got a copy of the plan, which was widely believed to have been kept secret from the press when it was released. (Jets spokeswoman Marissa Shorenstein said this week it was given to anyone reporter who asked for it.) But it isn’t so much a plan as it is a plan for a plan. In it, the consultants promise to “[establish] parameters for firm participation” and “implement an outreach strategy to target areas of high unemployment.” Jets President Jay Cross was widely quoted at the time as saying the stadium would give “up to $100 million” worth of work to minority-led firms (about 5 percent of the total project cost), but the plan doesn’t even mention that figure as a goal, let alone guarantee it. By contrast, developer Forest City Ratner promises in the Atlantic Yards agreement at least to try to hire 35 percent minority construction workers and to steer 20 percent of the construction spending to minority-owned firms for the 22-acre project in Brooklyn, which will include a new basketball arena for the Nets and 16 apartment and office towers.

Yet one element that the Jets included that Forest City did not was a conflict-of-interest clause: the politicians, association heads and consultants who were on the minority advisory board for the stadium and were to continue on as supervisors of the agreement “will be precluded from entering into any service contract work with the NY Jets and its consultants on the [New York Sports and Convention Center] project.”

Earle Walker, executive director of the Regional Alliance for Small Contractors, which devised the Jets agreement, told the Real Estate that the conflict-of-interest clause came about largely for a practical reason. “We would have a meeting that would go on for two or three hours and we would spend at least an hour on who was going to get what contract,” he told the Real Estate.

Just imagine what went on in that Forest City board room!

Without such a conflict-of-interest clause, three of the eight signatories of the Atlantic Yards agreement have already received money from Ratner. BUILD, which had received $138,000 as of mid-October, is drafting its jobs program right now. The big question is whether BUILD will actually do the training itself (and take much of the money), or subcontract it out to other certified, and experienced, job-training programs (and simply take an administrative fee).

Matthew Schuerman

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President