<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Sunday Magazine: Lukewarm on Warner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2006/03/sunday-magazine-lukewarm-on-warner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Sunday Magazine: Lukewarm on Warner</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/03/sunday-magazine-lukewarm-on-warner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:35:30 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/03/sunday-magazine-lukewarm-on-warner/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/03/sunday-magazine-lukewarm-on-warner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/cover.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/cover.jpg" border="1" /></a></p>
<p>This Sunday's Times Magazine isn't online yet, but The Politicker got an early look at the grinning-Mark-Warner cover and the cover story, by Matt Bai. He portrays <a href="http://www.ForwardTogetherPAC.com">Warner</a> as the likeliest anti-Hillary, and as a talented guy who's not quite ready for prime time, and apparently unwilling to take the only path Bai sees as a potential winner: running against the establishment.</p>
<p>Bai notes Hillary's strength, and Warner's consequent weakness, with African-American voters, and quotes Joe Trippi on Warner's hopes: "It's not possible.... The way for Mark Warner? Leave the freakin' party." (Of course, Trippi would say that.) Bai also notes that Warner is running as Bill Clinton '92; but Clinton was lucky enough to have that year's New York superstar, Mario Cuomo, get out of the way. </p>
<p>Also: Is March 2006 the month you really want to be the flavor of?</p>
<p>In the piece, Warner doesn't engage Hillary directly, though Bai gives it a shot:</p>
<div class="oldbq">Is Clinton, I asked Warner, and "electable" Democrat? "I think she's a very strong senator," he said slowly, pausing several times. "And I think what she showed in New York was an ability to really make her case among people who might not intiallly be supportive." </p>
<p>We stared at each other. "O.K.," I said. "But is she electable?"</p>
<p>"If she decides to run, she'll be the frontrunner," Warner replied carefully.</p></div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/cover.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/cover.jpg" border="1" /></a></p>
<p>This Sunday's Times Magazine isn't online yet, but The Politicker got an early look at the grinning-Mark-Warner cover and the cover story, by Matt Bai. He portrays <a href="http://www.ForwardTogetherPAC.com">Warner</a> as the likeliest anti-Hillary, and as a talented guy who's not quite ready for prime time, and apparently unwilling to take the only path Bai sees as a potential winner: running against the establishment.</p>
<p>Bai notes Hillary's strength, and Warner's consequent weakness, with African-American voters, and quotes Joe Trippi on Warner's hopes: "It's not possible.... The way for Mark Warner? Leave the freakin' party." (Of course, Trippi would say that.) Bai also notes that Warner is running as Bill Clinton '92; but Clinton was lucky enough to have that year's New York superstar, Mario Cuomo, get out of the way. </p>
<p>Also: Is March 2006 the month you really want to be the flavor of?</p>
<p>In the piece, Warner doesn't engage Hillary directly, though Bai gives it a shot:</p>
<div class="oldbq">Is Clinton, I asked Warner, and "electable" Democrat? "I think she's a very strong senator," he said slowly, pausing several times. "And I think what she showed in New York was an ability to really make her case among people who might not intiallly be supportive." </p>
<p>We stared at each other. "O.K.," I said. "But is she electable?"</p>
<p>"If she decides to run, she'll be the frontrunner," Warner replied carefully.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/03/sunday-magazine-lukewarm-on-warner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/cover.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
