<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; What Oscar Party Survived the Hype?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2006/03/what-oscar-party-survived-the-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>What Oscar Party Survived the Hype?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/03/what-oscar-party-survived-the-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:37:11 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/03/what-oscar-party-survived-the-hype/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/03/what-oscar-party-survived-the-hype/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 3, Gawker <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/parties/and-the-nominees-for-best-new-york-oscars-party-are-158356.php">published <i>New York</i> magazine's publicist's Oscar party pitch</a>. An editor of Gawker wrote that "the newly upstart <i>New York</i> magazine" would throw an Oscar party at "a hipper venue" than the annual <i>Entertainment Weekly</i> Oscar party, and went on to publish "an impressive list" of the publicist's confirmed celebs.</p>
<p>Take-backs! <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/real-estate/gossip-roundup-joaquin-phoenix-consoles-himself-with-tribeca-loft-158607.php">On March 6</a>, after the Oscars, Gawker summarized Jo Piazza's <i>New York Daily News</i> item on the <i>New York</i> mag party as "New York Oscar parties kind of suck when all the good people are actually at the Oscars instead."</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/oscars/oscar-night-in-new-york-with-new-york-158610.php">But wait, there's more</a>! "But the truth is," wrote Gawker later on March 6, shifting gears quite a bit, "that notwithstanding the not-quite-living-up-to-the-hype part, the absence of big-deal celebrities made the New York night&mdash;dare we say it?&mdash;awfully fun." The party write-up then goes on to name-check most of the staff of <i>New York</i> magazine, as well as Gawker's editorial director.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 3, Gawker <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/parties/and-the-nominees-for-best-new-york-oscars-party-are-158356.php">published <i>New York</i> magazine's publicist's Oscar party pitch</a>. An editor of Gawker wrote that "the newly upstart <i>New York</i> magazine" would throw an Oscar party at "a hipper venue" than the annual <i>Entertainment Weekly</i> Oscar party, and went on to publish "an impressive list" of the publicist's confirmed celebs.</p>
<p>Take-backs! <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/real-estate/gossip-roundup-joaquin-phoenix-consoles-himself-with-tribeca-loft-158607.php">On March 6</a>, after the Oscars, Gawker summarized Jo Piazza's <i>New York Daily News</i> item on the <i>New York</i> mag party as "New York Oscar parties kind of suck when all the good people are actually at the Oscars instead."</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/oscars/oscar-night-in-new-york-with-new-york-158610.php">But wait, there's more</a>! "But the truth is," wrote Gawker later on March 6, shifting gears quite a bit, "that notwithstanding the not-quite-living-up-to-the-hype part, the absence of big-deal celebrities made the New York night&mdash;dare we say it?&mdash;awfully fun." The party write-up then goes on to name-check most of the staff of <i>New York</i> magazine, as well as Gawker's editorial director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/03/what-oscar-party-survived-the-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
