<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Who Will Public-Edit the Public Editor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2006/05/who-will-publicedit-the-public-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Who Will Public-Edit the Public Editor?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/05/who-will-publicedit-the-public-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 19:36:13 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/05/who-will-publicedit-the-public-editor/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/05/who-will-publicedit-the-public-editor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em> public editor <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/opinion/21pubed.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fThe%20Public%20Editor&amp;_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all">Byron Calame</a>, writing May 21 on the paper's disputed coverage of possible standing-room travel on airlines: </p>
<div class="oldbq">And so, as often happens with nearly unbelievable stories, this one took on a life of its own. The concept grabbed headlines in scores of publications around the world and was even incorporated into illustrations on the cover of The New Yorker and on The Times's Op-Ed page.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/20060508/20060508_Gabriel_Sherman_media_offtherecord-2.asp#Airbus">Off the Record</a>, writing May 3 about the <em>Times</em>' disputed coverage of possible standing-room travel on airlines: </p>
<div class="oldbq">In the week between the original story and the correction, the standing-room claim took on a life of its own. The May 8 New Yorker, appearing May 1, featured a cover painting by Bruce McCall of an airliner with standing-room seats....<br />
On May 1, The Times ran an Op-Ed illustration by the Open design studio spoofing the standing-room concept.</div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em> public editor <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/opinion/21pubed.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fThe%20Public%20Editor&amp;_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all">Byron Calame</a>, writing May 21 on the paper's disputed coverage of possible standing-room travel on airlines: </p>
<div class="oldbq">And so, as often happens with nearly unbelievable stories, this one took on a life of its own. The concept grabbed headlines in scores of publications around the world and was even incorporated into illustrations on the cover of The New Yorker and on The Times's Op-Ed page.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/20060508/20060508_Gabriel_Sherman_media_offtherecord-2.asp#Airbus">Off the Record</a>, writing May 3 about the <em>Times</em>' disputed coverage of possible standing-room travel on airlines: </p>
<div class="oldbq">In the week between the original story and the correction, the standing-room claim took on a life of its own. The May 8 New Yorker, appearing May 1, featured a cover painting by Bruce McCall of an airliner with standing-room seats....<br />
On May 1, The Times ran an Op-Ed illustration by the Open design studio spoofing the standing-room concept.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/05/who-will-publicedit-the-public-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
