<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; California Dreamin’— With Wide Open Eyes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2006/08/california-dreamin-with-wide-open-eyes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>California Dreamin’— With Wide Open Eyes</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/08/california-dreamin-with-wide-open-eyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/08/california-dreamin-with-wide-open-eyes/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matthew Price</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/08/california-dreamin-with-wide-open-eyes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/080706_article_book_price.jpg?w=241&h=300" />You get a lot of strange reactions when you say you like Los Angeles in New York. A furrowed brow, sometimes a disapproving snort, usually followed by the inevitable comeback that San Francisco is so much better. I don&rsquo;t get this. Sure, San Francisco is pretty as a postcard, but to me, it&rsquo;s just the boutique city by the bay. That sprawling, disorderly city to the south&mdash;the one, we&rsquo;re frequently told, that exists in total defiance of nature, that&rsquo;s really no city at all&mdash;is the real thing. A friend said to me that there are only three cities with purpose in America: New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. Folks around here will sign on for the first two, but L.A.? No way.</p>
<p>Of course, Eastern disdain for Southern California is a fine old tradition&mdash;which is kind of funny, since so many Easterners (and plenty of New Yorkers) live there. As Amy Wilentz reminds us several times in <i>I Feel Earthquakes More Often Than They Happen</i>, a winding memoir doing double duty as a travelogue and sociopolitical study, she&rsquo;s just a Jersey girl (Perth Amboy) and former resident of the Upper West Side trying to figure out the Southland thing. When her husband took a job at the <i>Los Angeles Times</i> in 2003, Ms. Wilentz, an accomplished journalist and former Jerusalem correspondent for <i>The New Yorker</i>, packed up and touched down in &ldquo;a gas-guzzling consumathon with hundreds of thousands of miles of asphalt but barely any public transportation.&rdquo; </p>
<p>Which isn&rsquo;t to say that Ms. Wilentz flat-out dislikes Los Angeles&mdash;throughout, she carefully monitors her ambivalence and settles for a heavily qualified &ldquo;O.K.&rdquo; As she playfully notes, such is the lot of many New Yorkers who both love and loathe the same things: cars, blondes, pools, sunshine&mdash;the whole SoCal shebang. Still, she catalogs all the greatest hits from the Southern-California-as-apocalypse play list: the threat of earthquakes, subdivisions besieged by brushfires, way too many people and not nearly enough water&mdash;that is, until it rains, which brings mudslides and wrecked houses. You know the drill. </p>
<p>As all this is happening, Ms. Wilentz also tries to get her head around the political earthquake otherwise known as Arnold Schwarzenegger, who swept to victory in a Republican-led recall of Democrat Gray Davis in 2003. Ms. Wilentz states her liberal bona fides, but she has a soft spot for the Governator, even if she can&rsquo;t quite explain why. She more or less gives him a pass on his alleged bad behavior and sexual indiscretions. Her intellect tells her he&rsquo;s a bad thing, but, refreshingly, she doesn&rsquo;t dismiss him&mdash;or the carnivalesque recall, which had most Democrats frothing at the mouth. She concludes that there&rsquo;s a certain kooky logic to the rise of Governor Schwarzenegger: He&rsquo;s a huckster, a glad-hander, a salesman, a cad, an affable lunkhead, yet he somehow makes sense. After all, like many Californians, Mr. Schwarzenegger is a &ldquo;self-invented figure,&rdquo; she notes, and hardly the first movie star to get himself elected to California office: There&rsquo;s Clint and, of course,  Ronald Reagan. Mr. Schwarzenegger is a pure narcissist, but that makes him even more of a force in the political arena. (Despite a few bungles&mdash;like taking on the state&rsquo;s nurses&mdash;the chances are decent that he&rsquo;ll win another term this fall.) What can she say? Ms. Wilentz digs his vibe. </p>
<p>Still, she never gets too cozy in her new environs. For a reporter who&rsquo;s done time in some tough places&mdash;Haiti, for her first book, <i>The Rainy Season</i> (1989), and then the Middle East, about which she wrote a novel, <i>Martyrs&rsquo; Crossing</i> (2001)&mdash;Ms. Wilentz is spooked by SoCal. (&ldquo;I had arrived in LA hoping to avoid catastrophe, only to find that I was living in its capital.&rdquo;) Back in the 60&rsquo;s, Joan Didion practically invented the genre of California unease; some 40 years on, there&rsquo;s still much to be uneasy about. But Ms. Wilentz&rsquo;s opening set piece, a visit to California City, which is little more than a white elephant in the Mojave Desert, is something of a cheap shot. As Gertrude Stein once said of another California city (Oakland, to be exact), there&rsquo;s no there there. It&rsquo;s a failed Levittown, &ldquo;urban development in the wild,&rdquo; the product of a bogus vision, which, Ms. Wilentz implies, perhaps helps to explain California itself. </p>
<p>Ms. Wilentz takes other jaunts&mdash;up north to Big Sur, where she pokes around a New Age retreat, to the agricultural hub of Central Valley, and to the surreal landscapes of the Salton Sea. If these trips prompt some interesting observations, I found her sections on Los Angeles, which take up a good portion of the book, disappointing and familiar. She stays mostly confined to a narrow band of the Angeleno elite: She trades notes with Arianna Huffington, who also ran for governor, and talks politics with Warren Beatty over lunch, an encounter that yields little more than tepid celebrity journalism. </p>
<p>Ms. Wilentz hobnobs with Stewart and Lynda Resnick, an Eastern-born, liberal power couple who&rsquo;ve made it big out west. (They have extensive agribusiness holdings and are co-owners of the Franklin Mint, tchotchke manufacturers extraordinaire.) For Ms. Wilentz, the Resnicks are exemplars of a particular kind of spectacularly vulgar L.A. nouveau riche success. And they, in turn, don&rsquo;t know quite what to make of Ms. Wilentz: &ldquo;To them, I&rsquo;m a strange alien observer, at best.&rdquo; Recalling these encounters&mdash;Mr. Resnick once mistakes her for his &ldquo;industrial psychologist&rdquo;&mdash;she does what any New Yorker might do and retreats into a self-deprecating shtick that, at times, shades into bizarre self-pity. </p>
<p>When she gets away from this crowd, her account sharpens. Her trip to Lakewood, a 1950&rsquo;s suburban tract-housing community, tells one a lot about where that much-remarked-upon sprawl came from, and why, for better or worse, it&rsquo;s offered a version of middle-class paradise. Ms. Wilentz&rsquo;s prose never quite cuts to the bone, but her brief meditation on Lakewood has both sting and pathos. Contrasting it to her own New Jersey town, she jibes that &ldquo;we were not made full-blown and then sold all at once.&rdquo; Lakewood, she allows, &ldquo;is a place that admits what it is, that longs for nothing more, that lives up to small, reachable expectations.&rdquo; There&rsquo;s a great deal of wisdom in those lines.</p>
<p>But I wish Ms. Wilentz had more to say about Los Angeles&rsquo; urban ecology, which I find completely fascinating. About the built environment, she offers up the trite remark that L.A.&rsquo;s architecture is &ldquo;relatively inauthentic&rdquo;&mdash;which misses the point. For all its problems&mdash;its patches of blight, its traffic jams, its infamous Skid Row and about half a dozen other social ills&mdash;Los Angeles is actually an extraordinarily beautiful place, with a wonderful jumble of housing styles and neighborhoods. And the best way to see this Los Angeles isn&rsquo;t necessarily by car. Here&rsquo;s a tip. It may not always be practical, and you&rsquo;ll certainly get some strange looks, but next time you visit, tackle L.A. New York&ndash;style: by bus, by subway (it exists) and, yes, even by foot.</p>
<p><i>Matthew Price writes for</i> Bookforum <i>and other publications.</i></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/080706_article_book_price.jpg?w=241&h=300" />You get a lot of strange reactions when you say you like Los Angeles in New York. A furrowed brow, sometimes a disapproving snort, usually followed by the inevitable comeback that San Francisco is so much better. I don&rsquo;t get this. Sure, San Francisco is pretty as a postcard, but to me, it&rsquo;s just the boutique city by the bay. That sprawling, disorderly city to the south&mdash;the one, we&rsquo;re frequently told, that exists in total defiance of nature, that&rsquo;s really no city at all&mdash;is the real thing. A friend said to me that there are only three cities with purpose in America: New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. Folks around here will sign on for the first two, but L.A.? No way.</p>
<p>Of course, Eastern disdain for Southern California is a fine old tradition&mdash;which is kind of funny, since so many Easterners (and plenty of New Yorkers) live there. As Amy Wilentz reminds us several times in <i>I Feel Earthquakes More Often Than They Happen</i>, a winding memoir doing double duty as a travelogue and sociopolitical study, she&rsquo;s just a Jersey girl (Perth Amboy) and former resident of the Upper West Side trying to figure out the Southland thing. When her husband took a job at the <i>Los Angeles Times</i> in 2003, Ms. Wilentz, an accomplished journalist and former Jerusalem correspondent for <i>The New Yorker</i>, packed up and touched down in &ldquo;a gas-guzzling consumathon with hundreds of thousands of miles of asphalt but barely any public transportation.&rdquo; </p>
<p>Which isn&rsquo;t to say that Ms. Wilentz flat-out dislikes Los Angeles&mdash;throughout, she carefully monitors her ambivalence and settles for a heavily qualified &ldquo;O.K.&rdquo; As she playfully notes, such is the lot of many New Yorkers who both love and loathe the same things: cars, blondes, pools, sunshine&mdash;the whole SoCal shebang. Still, she catalogs all the greatest hits from the Southern-California-as-apocalypse play list: the threat of earthquakes, subdivisions besieged by brushfires, way too many people and not nearly enough water&mdash;that is, until it rains, which brings mudslides and wrecked houses. You know the drill. </p>
<p>As all this is happening, Ms. Wilentz also tries to get her head around the political earthquake otherwise known as Arnold Schwarzenegger, who swept to victory in a Republican-led recall of Democrat Gray Davis in 2003. Ms. Wilentz states her liberal bona fides, but she has a soft spot for the Governator, even if she can&rsquo;t quite explain why. She more or less gives him a pass on his alleged bad behavior and sexual indiscretions. Her intellect tells her he&rsquo;s a bad thing, but, refreshingly, she doesn&rsquo;t dismiss him&mdash;or the carnivalesque recall, which had most Democrats frothing at the mouth. She concludes that there&rsquo;s a certain kooky logic to the rise of Governor Schwarzenegger: He&rsquo;s a huckster, a glad-hander, a salesman, a cad, an affable lunkhead, yet he somehow makes sense. After all, like many Californians, Mr. Schwarzenegger is a &ldquo;self-invented figure,&rdquo; she notes, and hardly the first movie star to get himself elected to California office: There&rsquo;s Clint and, of course,  Ronald Reagan. Mr. Schwarzenegger is a pure narcissist, but that makes him even more of a force in the political arena. (Despite a few bungles&mdash;like taking on the state&rsquo;s nurses&mdash;the chances are decent that he&rsquo;ll win another term this fall.) What can she say? Ms. Wilentz digs his vibe. </p>
<p>Still, she never gets too cozy in her new environs. For a reporter who&rsquo;s done time in some tough places&mdash;Haiti, for her first book, <i>The Rainy Season</i> (1989), and then the Middle East, about which she wrote a novel, <i>Martyrs&rsquo; Crossing</i> (2001)&mdash;Ms. Wilentz is spooked by SoCal. (&ldquo;I had arrived in LA hoping to avoid catastrophe, only to find that I was living in its capital.&rdquo;) Back in the 60&rsquo;s, Joan Didion practically invented the genre of California unease; some 40 years on, there&rsquo;s still much to be uneasy about. But Ms. Wilentz&rsquo;s opening set piece, a visit to California City, which is little more than a white elephant in the Mojave Desert, is something of a cheap shot. As Gertrude Stein once said of another California city (Oakland, to be exact), there&rsquo;s no there there. It&rsquo;s a failed Levittown, &ldquo;urban development in the wild,&rdquo; the product of a bogus vision, which, Ms. Wilentz implies, perhaps helps to explain California itself. </p>
<p>Ms. Wilentz takes other jaunts&mdash;up north to Big Sur, where she pokes around a New Age retreat, to the agricultural hub of Central Valley, and to the surreal landscapes of the Salton Sea. If these trips prompt some interesting observations, I found her sections on Los Angeles, which take up a good portion of the book, disappointing and familiar. She stays mostly confined to a narrow band of the Angeleno elite: She trades notes with Arianna Huffington, who also ran for governor, and talks politics with Warren Beatty over lunch, an encounter that yields little more than tepid celebrity journalism. </p>
<p>Ms. Wilentz hobnobs with Stewart and Lynda Resnick, an Eastern-born, liberal power couple who&rsquo;ve made it big out west. (They have extensive agribusiness holdings and are co-owners of the Franklin Mint, tchotchke manufacturers extraordinaire.) For Ms. Wilentz, the Resnicks are exemplars of a particular kind of spectacularly vulgar L.A. nouveau riche success. And they, in turn, don&rsquo;t know quite what to make of Ms. Wilentz: &ldquo;To them, I&rsquo;m a strange alien observer, at best.&rdquo; Recalling these encounters&mdash;Mr. Resnick once mistakes her for his &ldquo;industrial psychologist&rdquo;&mdash;she does what any New Yorker might do and retreats into a self-deprecating shtick that, at times, shades into bizarre self-pity. </p>
<p>When she gets away from this crowd, her account sharpens. Her trip to Lakewood, a 1950&rsquo;s suburban tract-housing community, tells one a lot about where that much-remarked-upon sprawl came from, and why, for better or worse, it&rsquo;s offered a version of middle-class paradise. Ms. Wilentz&rsquo;s prose never quite cuts to the bone, but her brief meditation on Lakewood has both sting and pathos. Contrasting it to her own New Jersey town, she jibes that &ldquo;we were not made full-blown and then sold all at once.&rdquo; Lakewood, she allows, &ldquo;is a place that admits what it is, that longs for nothing more, that lives up to small, reachable expectations.&rdquo; There&rsquo;s a great deal of wisdom in those lines.</p>
<p>But I wish Ms. Wilentz had more to say about Los Angeles&rsquo; urban ecology, which I find completely fascinating. About the built environment, she offers up the trite remark that L.A.&rsquo;s architecture is &ldquo;relatively inauthentic&rdquo;&mdash;which misses the point. For all its problems&mdash;its patches of blight, its traffic jams, its infamous Skid Row and about half a dozen other social ills&mdash;Los Angeles is actually an extraordinarily beautiful place, with a wonderful jumble of housing styles and neighborhoods. And the best way to see this Los Angeles isn&rsquo;t necessarily by car. Here&rsquo;s a tip. It may not always be practical, and you&rsquo;ll certainly get some strange looks, but next time you visit, tackle L.A. New York&ndash;style: by bus, by subway (it exists) and, yes, even by foot.</p>
<p><i>Matthew Price writes for</i> Bookforum <i>and other publications.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/08/california-dreamin-with-wide-open-eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/080706_article_book_price.jpg?w=241&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
