Connor introduced evidence including phone records, gas activation, credit card charges and rent deposits which he claims refutes all Diamondstone's claims to have lived with his partner in an apartment on Dean Street rather than a building on Clinton Street which they own.

His version of the court proceedings and the evidence presented differs sharply from Connor's. He says he was often seen in the building he claims as a former residence because his duties as a landlord required him to be there daily to take out the garbage and sort the mail. The phone calls were made during this time.