<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Pete King v. the Automatons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2006/10/pete-king-v-the-automatons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Pete King v. the Automatons</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/10/pete-king-v-the-automatons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:13:24 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/10/pete-king-v-the-automatons/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/10/pete-king-v-the-automatons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pete King has spent the last couple of weeks dismissing the notion that he's in a close race, an impression that stems largely from a poll that showed him leading little-known challenger Democrat Dave Mejias by only two points. He <a href="http://www.observer.com/20061030/20061030_Jason_Horowitz_pageone_newsstory1.asp">argued </a>that the polling firm, Constituent Dynamics, was unreliable because it used automated pollsters, and that his internal polling, conducted by human beings, had him up by well over 20 points. </p>
<p>The firm defended the accuracy of its data in a discussion last week.</p>
<p>Now, after Constituent Dynamics released another poll earlier today showing King up by a mere 49 percent to Mejias' 48 percent among likely voters, the congressman is even more convinced that the numbers are a fiction.</p>
<p>"There is no credibility to those polls," King said. </p>
<p>By way of contrast, he shared what we said were his internal polling numbers -- from the firm McLaughlin &amp; Associates -- which showed that as of October 18th, he was up 55 percent to 32 percent. A subsequent polling of 400 people taken Friday October 27th showed a  54 percent to 27 percent advantage. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Mejias is plugging away, releasing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-o0_zZKJGk">another ad </a> today taking King to task for his support of President Bush and the war in Iraq. </p>
<p><em>--Jason Horowitz</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete King has spent the last couple of weeks dismissing the notion that he's in a close race, an impression that stems largely from a poll that showed him leading little-known challenger Democrat Dave Mejias by only two points. He <a href="http://www.observer.com/20061030/20061030_Jason_Horowitz_pageone_newsstory1.asp">argued </a>that the polling firm, Constituent Dynamics, was unreliable because it used automated pollsters, and that his internal polling, conducted by human beings, had him up by well over 20 points. </p>
<p>The firm defended the accuracy of its data in a discussion last week.</p>
<p>Now, after Constituent Dynamics released another poll earlier today showing King up by a mere 49 percent to Mejias' 48 percent among likely voters, the congressman is even more convinced that the numbers are a fiction.</p>
<p>"There is no credibility to those polls," King said. </p>
<p>By way of contrast, he shared what we said were his internal polling numbers -- from the firm McLaughlin &amp; Associates -- which showed that as of October 18th, he was up 55 percent to 32 percent. A subsequent polling of 400 people taken Friday October 27th showed a  54 percent to 27 percent advantage. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Mejias is plugging away, releasing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-o0_zZKJGk">another ad </a> today taking King to task for his support of President Bush and the war in Iraq. </p>
<p><em>--Jason Horowitz</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/10/pete-king-v-the-automatons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
