What's The Frequency, Lockhart?

This morning, two men staked out the Gawker offices at 89 Crosby Street, according to Lockhart Steele, managing editor of Gawker media.

A man named Michael, owner of Tungsten Properties, wouldn’t give his last name when we called to ask him about it, though he admits he showed up at the door of the company looking for Steele.

Steele said Michael called the Gawker offices and sent him a text message and called him, asking him to take down a post on the real-estate blog Curbed. (In addition to being managing editor of Gawker media, owned by Soho web titan Nick Denton, Steele is a founder of Curbed and a group of related sites devoted to architecture and food.)

The item of contention was a reader’s comment, actually, on a post Curbed did about Time Out New York‘s cover feature, “The 50 Best Blocks in New York.”

The reader wrote Curbed an email, purporting to work at Tungsten Properties, located at 13 Crosby, and said of the block of Howard Street between Broadway and Mercer Street (No. 19 on the Time Out list): “Number 19 is a fucking atrocity” and “a blight to Soho.”

“This somehow triggered Armageddon for him [Michael],” Steele said.

And when Michael didn’t get a response from Steele, he took it one step further and walked down the street to the offices to look for him–asking Denton and other Gawker employees for Steele and generally giving off a creepy, “What’s the frequency, Kenneth?” kind of vibe.

(Or weirder? One passerby said Michael “said he was furious he couldn’t get a hold of anyone at Curbed … that you can’t just say someone hates black jews.”)

Steele got the message they were there and called Michael, and asked him to go back to the Tungsten offices and draft a response to the post that was steaming them up.

“We’ve spoken to just about all of our agents at Tungsten Properties and none of them have written this,” a source at Tungsten tells TRE. “This is very unlike us and not only do we love our neighborhood and we’re working on investment site around the corner. We’re very proud of our neighborhood and we wouldn’t write it like that.”

Steele refused to take the post down but has updated the contentious item with a statement from Tungsten (here).

– Gillian Reagan

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President