<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Report: Manhattan Housing Slightly Less Astronomically Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/01/report-manhattan-housing-slightly-less-astronomically-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Report: Manhattan Housing Slightly Less Astronomically Expensive</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/01/report-manhattan-housing-slightly-less-astronomically-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/01/report-manhattan-housing-slightly-less-astronomically-expensive/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/01/report-manhattan-housing-slightly-less-astronomically-expensive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let's go right for the negative: In the fourth quarter of 2006, for the first time in more than a year, the average price per square foot for a Manhattan apartment fell below $1,000, according to a new report. The report, from appraisal firm <a href="http://www.millersamuel.com">Miller Samuel</a> and brokerage <a href="http://www.elliman.com">Prudential Douglas Elliman</a>, shows the average dropping 5 percent from $1,050 in the third quarter to $998 in the fourth. It was last below $1,000 in the third quarter of 2005, when it reached $984.</p>
<p>Otherwise, the report--a benchmark for the health of the Manhattan housing market, along with others from <a href="http://www.halstead.com">Halstead Property</a> and the <a href="http://corcoran.com">Corcoran Group</a>--painted a familiar picture of a Manhattan that remains very expensive, even with other quarterly price dips besides the per-foot slide.</p>
<p>Every Manhattan-wide sales-price marker cited in the Miller Samuel report--average, median and per-foot--declined slightly from the third quarter to the fourth. But the meaning's in the details: The average, for instance, declined from $1,288,748 to $1,224,840.</p>
<p>In a borough where the median <em>household</em> income was $50,000 in 2005, does that drop to $1,224,840 really make a difference to most?</p>
<p><em>- Tom Acitelli</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's go right for the negative: In the fourth quarter of 2006, for the first time in more than a year, the average price per square foot for a Manhattan apartment fell below $1,000, according to a new report. The report, from appraisal firm <a href="http://www.millersamuel.com">Miller Samuel</a> and brokerage <a href="http://www.elliman.com">Prudential Douglas Elliman</a>, shows the average dropping 5 percent from $1,050 in the third quarter to $998 in the fourth. It was last below $1,000 in the third quarter of 2005, when it reached $984.</p>
<p>Otherwise, the report--a benchmark for the health of the Manhattan housing market, along with others from <a href="http://www.halstead.com">Halstead Property</a> and the <a href="http://corcoran.com">Corcoran Group</a>--painted a familiar picture of a Manhattan that remains very expensive, even with other quarterly price dips besides the per-foot slide.</p>
<p>Every Manhattan-wide sales-price marker cited in the Miller Samuel report--average, median and per-foot--declined slightly from the third quarter to the fourth. But the meaning's in the details: The average, for instance, declined from $1,288,748 to $1,224,840.</p>
<p>In a borough where the median <em>household</em> income was $50,000 in 2005, does that drop to $1,224,840 really make a difference to most?</p>
<p><em>- Tom Acitelli</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/01/report-manhattan-housing-slightly-less-astronomically-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
