Rumble in Central Park: Who Will Get LeRoy’s Tavern?

counter jenniferleroy1v Rumble in Central Park: Who Will Get LeRoy’s Tavern?More than a quarter-century ago, the legendary restaurateur Warner LeRoy outfitted Tavern on the Green with some $10 million worth of bling.

What would you do with the city’s most glorified concession stand?

The Parks Department will soon be sifting through proposals. Its existing contract with LeRoy’s family expires on Dec. 31, 2009, and within a year from now, the right to run what is perhaps Manhattan’s most sacred eatery goes up for grabs. A formal request for proposals is expected in early 2008.

Under the present terms, the contract would likely rank among the sweetest deals in Manhattan retail by modern rental standards—if it were a lease, which it’s technically not; it’s a license agreement. “You’re not allowed to lease park land, unless it’s an act of the State Legislature,” noted Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe.

Under the terms of this agreement, reached in 1985, the LeRoy family currently pays the city only 3.5 percent of gross revenues—roughly $1.2 million out of more than $38 million in sales in 2006. With the iconic Tavern measuring in at a sprawling 27,000 square feet, that works out to just $44 per square foot annually.

The fee, though, is expected to rise substantially. “Central Park has improved a great deal over the last 25 years,” Mr. Benepe explained. “The improvement of the park has increased the value of concessions dramatically.”

Both the restaurant and the park were in starkly different shape back when Warner LeRoy negotiated those terms with the city.

“When Warner and the city first struck a deal, nobody wanted the place; it was falling apart, rat-infested,” said LeRoy family spokeswoman Shelley Clark.

Only after two years’ worth of renovations following the LeRoys’ mid-1970’s takeover did Tavern come to resemble the glimmering, palatial concession stand it is today.

Officials are now anticipating a rate more in line with that of another Central Park eatery, the Boathouse, which renewed operations under new terms back in 2000. Under that deal, the city receives around 16 percent, amounting to $2.3 million out of $14.5 million in sales, according to the Parks Department.

“They’re paying us twice as much in cash, even though the gross receipts at the Boathouse are less than half at Tavern on the Green,” noted Mr. Benepe, who cautioned, however, that the city is not set on any specific sum for the forthcoming Tavern deal. “I don’t think we’re going to set a number; we want to see how the market responds.”

Despite the expected price hike, officials are preparing for a baronial bidding battle. Tavern on the Green is still the top-grossing independently owned restaurant in Manhattan and is presently ranked No. 2 nationwide, according to industry trade magazine Restaurants & Institutions.

“We certainly hope there is [a bidding war],” Mr. Benepe told The Observer. “We’re planning already.”

All the “top people in the dining business” are potential players, said Mr. Benepe, who mentioned both the Boathouse’s Dean Poll and Danny Meyer of Shake Shack fame as “good concessionaires” who could possibly compete.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President