<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; McCain Won&#8217;t Quit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/07/mccain-wont-quit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>McCain Won&#8217;t Quit</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/07/mccain-wont-quit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:40:47 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/07/mccain-wont-quit/</link>
			<dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/07/mccain-wont-quit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#039;s big story was the rise of Barack Obama. Today&#039;s big story is the decline of John McCain. You&#039;ve probably heard the news by now that the former Republican frontrunner is laying off at least 50, and maybe 80 to 90, workers from his campaign organization. The cuts are a neccessity, because after another poor fundraising quarter, McCain has only $2 million on hand, a state of affairs the AP rightly calls &quot;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-McCain-Campaign.html?hp">abysmal</a>.&quot;
<p>The chatter about a McCain withdrawal, a low murmur last week, is about to get a lot louder. But I think that as bad as it looks (and as terminal as it probably is), I don&#039;t see the guy who happily accuses the other side of wanting to &quot;surrender&quot; in Iraq &quot;cutting and running&quot; from his last shot at the White House. He still has the Kerry-was-in-the-same-spot-in-&#039;03 illusion to cling to, plus he&#039;s got to realize how feeble the other three front-runners are (even if he&#039;s weaker right now). And as much as the fund-raising numbers seem bad for him, he&#039;s actually in a better spot than he was in 1999-2000--he&#039;s raised much more money for himself, and there&#039;s a much smaller gap between him and the other big dogs. I know the idea was he&#039;d be in first place with money this time, but that was probably always unrealistic with the lobbyist enemies he&#039;s made. For now, he&#039;s got enough to ride it out and see if he can become the next Kerry--and to avoid the name-calling that would accompany quitting, something that I think would be particularly hard for him to handle.</p>
<p>If he <em>were</em> to quit, however, I think McCain would need to seize on some kind of &quot;honorable&quot; way out, the way Joe Biden in &#039;87 was able to pretend he was leaving to fight the Robert Bork nomination. Maybe there&#039;s some scenario in which he could portray his exit as serving the larger war effort. But my read on him is that he&#039;d rather run and lose (badly) than be called a quitter.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Ryan Sager <a href="http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2007/07/mccain-watch-watch-this-space.html">liveblogged</a> the McCain campaign&#039;s afternoon conference call and said Terry Nelson and John Weaver sounded &quot;just about ready to <a href="http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2007/07/mccain-death-watch-sixth-sense.html">slit their wrists</a>.&quot; So the financial situation may be even worse than it appears. Obviously, McCain can&#039;t fall back on his heiress wife&#039;s fortune, as Kerry could in 2004. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#039;s big story was the rise of Barack Obama. Today&#039;s big story is the decline of John McCain. You&#039;ve probably heard the news by now that the former Republican frontrunner is laying off at least 50, and maybe 80 to 90, workers from his campaign organization. The cuts are a neccessity, because after another poor fundraising quarter, McCain has only $2 million on hand, a state of affairs the AP rightly calls &quot;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-McCain-Campaign.html?hp">abysmal</a>.&quot;
<p>The chatter about a McCain withdrawal, a low murmur last week, is about to get a lot louder. But I think that as bad as it looks (and as terminal as it probably is), I don&#039;t see the guy who happily accuses the other side of wanting to &quot;surrender&quot; in Iraq &quot;cutting and running&quot; from his last shot at the White House. He still has the Kerry-was-in-the-same-spot-in-&#039;03 illusion to cling to, plus he&#039;s got to realize how feeble the other three front-runners are (even if he&#039;s weaker right now). And as much as the fund-raising numbers seem bad for him, he&#039;s actually in a better spot than he was in 1999-2000--he&#039;s raised much more money for himself, and there&#039;s a much smaller gap between him and the other big dogs. I know the idea was he&#039;d be in first place with money this time, but that was probably always unrealistic with the lobbyist enemies he&#039;s made. For now, he&#039;s got enough to ride it out and see if he can become the next Kerry--and to avoid the name-calling that would accompany quitting, something that I think would be particularly hard for him to handle.</p>
<p>If he <em>were</em> to quit, however, I think McCain would need to seize on some kind of &quot;honorable&quot; way out, the way Joe Biden in &#039;87 was able to pretend he was leaving to fight the Robert Bork nomination. Maybe there&#039;s some scenario in which he could portray his exit as serving the larger war effort. But my read on him is that he&#039;d rather run and lose (badly) than be called a quitter.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Ryan Sager <a href="http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2007/07/mccain-watch-watch-this-space.html">liveblogged</a> the McCain campaign&#039;s afternoon conference call and said Terry Nelson and John Weaver sounded &quot;just about ready to <a href="http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2007/07/mccain-death-watch-sixth-sense.html">slit their wrists</a>.&quot; So the financial situation may be even worse than it appears. Obviously, McCain can&#039;t fall back on his heiress wife&#039;s fortune, as Kerry could in 2004. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/07/mccain-wont-quit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
