<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Will TimesSelect Be Killed Off?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/08/will-timesselect-be-killed-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Will TimesSelect Be Killed Off?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/08/will-timesselect-be-killed-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:21:57 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/08/will-timesselect-be-killed-off/</link>
			<dc:creator>Michael Calderone</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/08/will-timesselect-be-killed-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Rumors of TimesSelect&#039;s demise have been spread almost since the pay wall first went up in 2005. Maybe that was just wishful thinking on the part of those not wishing to drop almost $50 to read Tom Friedman and Maureen Dowd.  </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But today, the <em>New York Post</em> is reporting that soon readers will longer be charged for such ‘premium’ content. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08072007/business/timesselect_content_freed_business_holly_m__sanders.htm"><em>The Post </em>reported</a>:</p>
<p>“After much internal debate, Times executives—including publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr.—made the decision to end the subscription-only TimesSelect service but have yet to make an official announcement, according to a source briefed on the matter.”</p>
<p>The only hurdle left, according to <em>The Post</em>’s source, is software kinks to be worked out. </p>
<p>On July 19, <em>Slate’</em>s <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2171362/#tsdead">Mickey Kaus wrote</a> that he “hears rumblings that the paper is about to abandon the whole misconceived project.”</p>
<p>Two days later, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07212007/business/times_may_pull_plug_on_pay_site_business_keith_j__kelly.htm"><em>The Post </em>followed up</a> on that—with the classic photo-shopped black eye on publisher Arthur Sulzberger. (What, no Pinch-o-meter?)</p>
<p>And with spokesperson Catherine Mathis providing statements such as this one in today’s Post—“We continue to evaluate the best approach for NYTimes.com&quot;—speculation about Mr. Sulzberger tearing down that wall won&#039;t go away any time soon.  </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Rumors of TimesSelect&#039;s demise have been spread almost since the pay wall first went up in 2005. Maybe that was just wishful thinking on the part of those not wishing to drop almost $50 to read Tom Friedman and Maureen Dowd.  </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But today, the <em>New York Post</em> is reporting that soon readers will longer be charged for such ‘premium’ content. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08072007/business/timesselect_content_freed_business_holly_m__sanders.htm"><em>The Post </em>reported</a>:</p>
<p>“After much internal debate, Times executives—including publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr.—made the decision to end the subscription-only TimesSelect service but have yet to make an official announcement, according to a source briefed on the matter.”</p>
<p>The only hurdle left, according to <em>The Post</em>’s source, is software kinks to be worked out. </p>
<p>On July 19, <em>Slate’</em>s <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2171362/#tsdead">Mickey Kaus wrote</a> that he “hears rumblings that the paper is about to abandon the whole misconceived project.”</p>
<p>Two days later, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07212007/business/times_may_pull_plug_on_pay_site_business_keith_j__kelly.htm"><em>The Post </em>followed up</a> on that—with the classic photo-shopped black eye on publisher Arthur Sulzberger. (What, no Pinch-o-meter?)</p>
<p>And with spokesperson Catherine Mathis providing statements such as this one in today’s Post—“We continue to evaluate the best approach for NYTimes.com&quot;—speculation about Mr. Sulzberger tearing down that wall won&#039;t go away any time soon.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/08/will-timesselect-be-killed-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
