<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Did Si Newhouse &#8216;Rip Up&#8217; Portfolio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/09/did-si-newhouse-rip-up-iportfolioi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Did Si Newhouse &#8216;Rip Up&#8217; Portfolio?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/09/did-si-newhouse-rip-up-iportfolioi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:48:41 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/09/did-si-newhouse-rip-up-iportfolioi/</link>
			<dc:creator>Tom McGeveran</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/09/did-si-newhouse-rip-up-iportfolioi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s hard to evaluate the news coming from Keith Kelly&#039;s Media Ink column in <em>The New York Post</em> about Conde Nast chief Si Newhouse&#039;s Wednesday meeting with Joanne Lipman, editrix of <em>Portfolio.</em>
<p>The splashy $100 million project is the object of some Schadenfreude, though the Schaden-part has always been difficult to pin down.</p>
<p>We&#039;ve done a bit of it: <a href="/term/49788">click here</a> to read Michael Calderone on the topic. Past issues have seen stories get killed, reskedded and reorganized, and cover stories changed late in production, without the need for Mr. Newhouse&#039;s intervention. But this Wednesday meeting, the length and unusualness of which unnamed insiders who talked to Mr. Kelly seem to disagree on, has resulted in a &quot;flurry of Newhouse dictated changes.&quot; But what were they?</p>
<div class="oldbq">[One] insider insisted the changes amount to only &quot;tweaks&quot; to headlines and captions, as well as changes to the color on the cover. The cover topic was not changed.</div>
<p>And yet there must be some significant last-minute changes, since staffers are expected to be closing this issue right up until its drop-dead with the printer today. &quot;It seems like we&#039;ve been closing the magazine for three weeks,&quot; one source &quot;grumbled&quot; to Mr. Kelly.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/09282007/business/si_rips_up_portfolio.htm?page=1"><em>The New York Post</em></a> </li>
</ul>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s hard to evaluate the news coming from Keith Kelly&#039;s Media Ink column in <em>The New York Post</em> about Conde Nast chief Si Newhouse&#039;s Wednesday meeting with Joanne Lipman, editrix of <em>Portfolio.</em>
<p>The splashy $100 million project is the object of some Schadenfreude, though the Schaden-part has always been difficult to pin down.</p>
<p>We&#039;ve done a bit of it: <a href="/term/49788">click here</a> to read Michael Calderone on the topic. Past issues have seen stories get killed, reskedded and reorganized, and cover stories changed late in production, without the need for Mr. Newhouse&#039;s intervention. But this Wednesday meeting, the length and unusualness of which unnamed insiders who talked to Mr. Kelly seem to disagree on, has resulted in a &quot;flurry of Newhouse dictated changes.&quot; But what were they?</p>
<div class="oldbq">[One] insider insisted the changes amount to only &quot;tweaks&quot; to headlines and captions, as well as changes to the color on the cover. The cover topic was not changed.</div>
<p>And yet there must be some significant last-minute changes, since staffers are expected to be closing this issue right up until its drop-dead with the printer today. &quot;It seems like we&#039;ve been closing the magazine for three weeks,&quot; one source &quot;grumbled&quot; to Mr. Kelly.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/09282007/business/si_rips_up_portfolio.htm?page=1"><em>The New York Post</em></a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/09/did-si-newhouse-rip-up-iportfolioi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
