<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Murdoch: Killing Times Would be Nice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/10/murdoch-killing-itimesi-would-be-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Murdoch: Killing Times Would be Nice</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/murdoch-killing-itimesi-would-be-nice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:34:56 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/murdoch-killing-itimesi-would-be-nice/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/murdoch-killing-itimesi-would-be-nice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch was <a href="http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2193569,00.html">asked yesterday</a> at a web conference if he'd like to use <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> to &quot;kill&quot; <em>The New York Times</em>. &quot;That would be nice,&quot; he replied.</p>
<p>&quot;We have a lot of plans and a lot of ideas that need to be refined,&quot; he continued. &quot;But I want to improve it in every way: in what it does now in finance to start with, but I also want to add more national and international news.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I want to add major coverage of the arts, fashion and culture,&quot; he added. </p>
<p>What Mr. Murdoch outlined last night was both an improved <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and a fundamentally different newspaper. As <em>The Observer</em> reported this week, <em>Journal</em> editors <a href="/2007/murdoch-times-i-will-bury-you-keller-bristles">have already suggested</a> that under Mr. Murdoch the paper will aspire to compete on national stories.  (On a confernce call with <em>Journal </em>reperters, Managing Editor Marcus Brauchli recently gave the example of a bridge collapse in Minnesota.)  Editors also say the paper's Washington coverage looks likely to be beefed up. </p>
<p>And in case there was any doubt, last night Mr. Murdoch reinforced that in seeking these changes, he has an eye fixed squarely on the <em>Times</em>. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch was <a href="http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2193569,00.html">asked yesterday</a> at a web conference if he'd like to use <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> to &quot;kill&quot; <em>The New York Times</em>. &quot;That would be nice,&quot; he replied.</p>
<p>&quot;We have a lot of plans and a lot of ideas that need to be refined,&quot; he continued. &quot;But I want to improve it in every way: in what it does now in finance to start with, but I also want to add more national and international news.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I want to add major coverage of the arts, fashion and culture,&quot; he added. </p>
<p>What Mr. Murdoch outlined last night was both an improved <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and a fundamentally different newspaper. As <em>The Observer</em> reported this week, <em>Journal</em> editors <a href="/2007/murdoch-times-i-will-bury-you-keller-bristles">have already suggested</a> that under Mr. Murdoch the paper will aspire to compete on national stories.  (On a confernce call with <em>Journal </em>reperters, Managing Editor Marcus Brauchli recently gave the example of a bridge collapse in Minnesota.)  Editors also say the paper's Washington coverage looks likely to be beefed up. </p>
<p>And in case there was any doubt, last night Mr. Murdoch reinforced that in seeking these changes, he has an eye fixed squarely on the <em>Times</em>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/murdoch-killing-itimesi-would-be-nice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
