The Morning Read: Monday, October 29, 2007

The New Republic looks at Rudy Giuliani’s childhood.

Roger Stone is profiled in the Weekly Standard.

Eliot Spitzer announced his support for the Real ID Act,

and his plan for a three-tiered identification system in New York was criticized by some Democrats, including Adriano Espaillat, who said, “It’s separate but unequal.”

Spitzer said obtaining a driver’s license is like buying a Metrocard, because you don’t have to prove your citizenship to buy a Metrocard.

Lou Dobbs apologized to Spitzer, a little.

The city’s former liaison in Albany is being investigated for messages he sent to Kevin Sheekey and others after joining the private sector.

Fred Dicker reports that Spitzer is blocking an investigation by the state Commission on Public Integrity by claiming executive privilege.

Liz reports that Democrats weren’t told about Spitizer’s initial position on driver’s licenses, nor about his latest position.

Jacob Gershman writes that Spitzer is governing by accident.

Someone, obviously with more seychel than the editorialist at the Times, talked sense to the governor,” writes Richard Lipsky.

Writing in the Washington Post, David Greenberg says Rudy Giuliani is a bona fide “right winger.”

Jeff Klein draws up the Sub-Prime Hall of Shame.

Bill de Blasio talks to Jonathan Hicks about running for Brooklyn Borough President.

DC37 wants to end residency requirements for its members.

Barack Obama will contrast his record more forcefully with Hillary Clinton’s.

Obama said Hillary is ducking tough questions about pensions.

A former first lady was elected president, in Argentina.

The New York Times editorial board writes that “Mr. Spitzer too often treats his foes like villains instead of opponents.”

And the Daily News editorial board likes Spitzer’s latest position on driver’s licenses and says, “Advocates who object to second-class treatment for illegals are not facing up to the reality that these people live outside the laws of this country."

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President