Citigroup Expected to Get $1.6 B. for 388-390 Greenwich

breaks lathamcohencaplanbax Citigroup Expected to Get $1.6 B. for 388 390 GreenwichThe Citigroup building in Tribeca is expected to go to contract for about $1.6 billion, a deal that would make it the fourth-largest building sale in U.S. history, according to a source with knowledge of the deal.

A contract had not been signed as of The Observer’s deadline on Tuesday, but negotiations with two finalists had reached the final stage and it looked like the contract would be in record territory, if short of the record breaker that Citigroup and brokers had hoped it might be.

When Citigroup put the 2.6 million-square-foot building at 388-390 Greenwich Street on the market in September, it had hoped to achieve $700 per square foot, a total price that would have been higher than the record $1.8 billion that Kushner Companies paid for 666 Fifth Avenue in January. (Jared Kushner, a principal at Kushner Companies, is The Observer’s publisher.)

But in the months since the credit crunch, buyers who were so active in the spring have started to disappear. The source said that the contract price would be short of its goal because this deal was a sale leaseback, which means that Citigroup will maintain space in the building at slightly lower rents. (That’s a less attractive prospect to landlords who want to hike rents and lease to elite tenants like law firms and hedge funds.)

When the 388-390 Greenwich deal goes to contract, it’ll be just another eye-opening deal in what has been the greatest 12-month investment-sales run in Manhattan history. Some records in the past year: Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village closed in December at $5.4 billion, the biggest real estate deal in modern history; 666 Fifth closed in January at $1.8 billion; 825 Eighth Avenue closed at $1.73 billion, the second-largest building sale ever; 450 Park Avenue closed at over $1,500 per square foot, another record.

“Any billion-dollar building sale is a shot of adrenaline for the market,” said Dan Fasulo, a market analyst from research firm Real Capital Analytics.

“It’s probably not as much as they would have squeaked out six months ago,” he continued, “but the pricing is still very aggressive.”

The 388-390 Greenwich deal means that three of the four top building sales were all brokered by the same group: the Cushman & Wakefield investment team of Scott Latham, Richard Baxter, Jon Caplan and Ron Cohen. They would not comment for this story.

There’s still one other potential billion-dollar building sale on the market, too: 1177 Avenue of the Americas, which the Paramount Group has put up for sale.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President