Dan Rather's Lawyer: This Is Not a Defamation Claim

Last week, lawyers for CBS filed a motion to dismiss Dan Rather’s $70 million civil lawsuit against them in New York State Supreme Court.

One of their arguments is that Mr. Rather is essentially bringing a defamation charge against the network. Yesterday we caught up with Mr. Rather’s lawyer, Martin Gold.

“What they’re saying is that a claim for damage to reputation is a claim to defamation,” he said. “There’s no other way in the world of CBS that someone can hurt someone’s reputation other than defaming them. But defamation is making a false statement about somebody, which damages their reputation. We haven’t alleged false statements that they’ve made about Dan … What we’ve alleged is a scheme.”

We’ll have more from Mr. Gold in tomorrow’s NYTV column.

Article continues below
More from Politics
Richard Spencer shortly before getting punched on national television.
Before You Cheer the Attack on Richard Spencer, Consider the Strategy