<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; More on Hillary and the Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/11/more-on-hillary-and-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>More on Hillary and the Media</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/11/more-on-hillary-and-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:17:55 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/11/more-on-hillary-and-the-media/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zachary Roth</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/11/more-on-hillary-and-the-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071123/NATION/111230084/1001"><em>The Washington Times</em> takes a look</a> at the Hillary campaign's strategy for dealing with the media, and ends up reinforcing the <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681">conventional wisdom </a>that the Democratic frontrunner seeks to tightly control her message and keep the press at arm's length. We know -- shocker.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the story doesn't mention the episode that's become the locus classicus of the Hillary-vs-the-media storyline: when, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0907/5992.html">as <em>The Politico</em> first reported</a>, her camp got <em>GQ</em> to spike an unflattering story about the inner workings of the campaign. </p>
<p>The paper says it requested a list of press availabilities from Hillary's campaign, but never received one.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  As we should have mentioned, <em>The Observer</em> <a href="/2007/it-takes-chill">planted its flag</a> on this same turf almost ten months ago.  The spate of recent stories echoing the point kind of makes us wonder: Hasn't <em>anything</em> changed since then?  </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071123/NATION/111230084/1001"><em>The Washington Times</em> takes a look</a> at the Hillary campaign's strategy for dealing with the media, and ends up reinforcing the <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681">conventional wisdom </a>that the Democratic frontrunner seeks to tightly control her message and keep the press at arm's length. We know -- shocker.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the story doesn't mention the episode that's become the locus classicus of the Hillary-vs-the-media storyline: when, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0907/5992.html">as <em>The Politico</em> first reported</a>, her camp got <em>GQ</em> to spike an unflattering story about the inner workings of the campaign. </p>
<p>The paper says it requested a list of press availabilities from Hillary's campaign, but never received one.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  As we should have mentioned, <em>The Observer</em> <a href="/2007/it-takes-chill">planted its flag</a> on this same turf almost ten months ago.  The spate of recent stories echoing the point kind of makes us wonder: Hasn't <em>anything</em> changed since then?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/11/more-on-hillary-and-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
