Regan vs. Rudy

To the Editor:

Re “If She Did It” [Nov. 26]:

However mercurial she may be, Judith Regan does not suffer Swift Boaters gladly. Stung, smeared and derided by an incestuous media-political complex, this savvy firebrand decided that retribution is a dish best served ice cold. Hence her impeccably timed $100 million lawsuit.

Ms. Regan knows whose closet houses the most skeletons. And by revealing what Rupert, Rudolph and Roger knew and when they knew it, she might well change the course of human events—or the trajectory of the 2008 Republican primaries.

If Ms. Regan’s abrupt dismissal from HarperCollins was News Corporation’s preemptive bid to stop her from disclosing the extent of Roger Ailes’ propinquity to Rudolph Giuliani, it was a ham-handed failure. But any bombshells about Bernard Kerik or Fox News will be the least of Rudy’s woes.

No, what may finally undo Giuliani is the intense media spotlight Ms. Regan’s revelations will shed on his shameless exploitation of 9/11. Caucus and primary voters in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina are still unaware of Rudy’s self-aggrandizing tactics in sidelining FEMA and OSHA after the Al Qaeda attacks. Nor do they realize that America’s mayor ignored the growing toxicity at Ground Zero, imperiling scores of rescuers and first-responders.

Ms. Regan’s legal broadside may also focus national attention on Rudy’s revisionism. Though he remains as ill-informed about Al Qaeda today as he was during his mayoralty, Mr. Giuliani claims near omniscience in matters relating to war, peace, terrorism and the Middle East. And now he is agitating for a possible strike on Iran.

Rather than succumbing to such foreign policy folderol, voters must ask themselves: Cui bono? Who benefits from Rudy’s comic-book bellicosity?

Should this come to pass, we will have Ms. Regan to thank.

Rosario Iaconis
Mineola
, N.Y.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President