<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Atonement&#8217;s Long Shot Generating Buzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2007/12/iatonementis-long-shot-generating-buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Atonement&#8217;s Long Shot Generating Buzz</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/12/iatonementis-long-shot-generating-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:00:13 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/12/iatonementis-long-shot-generating-buzz/</link>
			<dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/12/iatonementis-long-shot-generating-buzz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica"> In the middle of the Golden-Globe nominated <em>Atonement</em>, a 5 1/2-minute shot unfolds as Robbie, a British World War II soldier (played by James McAvoy), steps on France's Dunkirk beach, where the final point in the British retreat from the Germans is portrayed as a grim circus of defeat and chaos. </span><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Through cinema history, audacious, lengthy tracking shots, like the one in <em>Atonement</em>, have captivated filmmakers and movie buffs who marvel at their grace and choreography. In a medium predicated on storytelling through the juxtaposition of images, the long tracking shot is the cinematic equivalent of a no-hitter in baseball: rare, untouched, and very difficult to pull off, <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20071226/119870766000.html">according to the Associated Press</a>.</span></p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">&quot;When we were making it, I didn't see it in the context of the classic tracking shot, or the history of great tracking shots,&quot; said Wright, whose &quot;Pride &amp; Prejudice&quot; included a long shot, as did his British TV film &quot;Charles II.&quot; &quot;It felt much, much smaller than that.&quot; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">But of course, the shot has been received precisely in that context. </span></p>
</div>
<div class="oldbq">
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Variety deputy editor Anne Thompson <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2007/12/atonement-long.html">blogged</a>:</span>It's a stunning shot, but does it take the viewer out of the movie, or serve a dramatic purpose? It makes you say, 'Wow, what a long shot! Look what Joe Wright did with the camera! Look how complex this is!' I for one get a kick out of bravura shots like this, whether it's Martin Scorsese, Brian DePalma, Robert Altman, Orson Welles, Antonioni or Alfonso Cuaron.&quot; </p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Perhaps the highest possible praise for such cinematic devices would echo that of umpires in baseball they're doing their job well when no one even notices them. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">New York Times film critic <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/movies/07aton.html">A.O. Scott, however, said</a> the &quot;Atonement&quot; shot's only impression is: &quot;`Wow, that's quite a tracking shot,' when it should be `My God, what a horrible experience that must have been.'&quot; </span></p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica"> In the middle of the Golden-Globe nominated <em>Atonement</em>, a 5 1/2-minute shot unfolds as Robbie, a British World War II soldier (played by James McAvoy), steps on France's Dunkirk beach, where the final point in the British retreat from the Germans is portrayed as a grim circus of defeat and chaos. </span><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Through cinema history, audacious, lengthy tracking shots, like the one in <em>Atonement</em>, have captivated filmmakers and movie buffs who marvel at their grace and choreography. In a medium predicated on storytelling through the juxtaposition of images, the long tracking shot is the cinematic equivalent of a no-hitter in baseball: rare, untouched, and very difficult to pull off, <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20071226/119870766000.html">according to the Associated Press</a>.</span></p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">&quot;When we were making it, I didn't see it in the context of the classic tracking shot, or the history of great tracking shots,&quot; said Wright, whose &quot;Pride &amp; Prejudice&quot; included a long shot, as did his British TV film &quot;Charles II.&quot; &quot;It felt much, much smaller than that.&quot; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">But of course, the shot has been received precisely in that context. </span></p>
</div>
<div class="oldbq">
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Variety deputy editor Anne Thompson <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2007/12/atonement-long.html">blogged</a>:</span>It's a stunning shot, but does it take the viewer out of the movie, or serve a dramatic purpose? It makes you say, 'Wow, what a long shot! Look what Joe Wright did with the camera! Look how complex this is!' I for one get a kick out of bravura shots like this, whether it's Martin Scorsese, Brian DePalma, Robert Altman, Orson Welles, Antonioni or Alfonso Cuaron.&quot; </p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">Perhaps the highest possible praise for such cinematic devices would echo that of umpires in baseball they're doing their job well when no one even notices them. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica">New York Times film critic <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/movies/07aton.html">A.O. Scott, however, said</a> the &quot;Atonement&quot; shot's only impression is: &quot;`Wow, that's quite a tracking shot,' when it should be `My God, what a horrible experience that must have been.'&quot; </span></p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/12/iatonementis-long-shot-generating-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
