It’s Diller Time!

But what happens with 23/6 will be an important harbinger of things to come; it was repeatedly pitched to me as where the CollegeHumor audience would go when they outgrow CollegeHumor, but so far it seems that where the CollegeHumor audience goes when they outgrow CollegeHumor is, in fact, CollegeHumor. (Mr. Van Veen says his readers’ average age is now 28.) 23/6 is also not housed in the company’s shiny new headquarters; it has an office in SoHo, down the hall from the Huffington Post, with which it has a partnership, and from where it seems to be getting most of its traffic, thanks to outbound links on the site.

IAC’s other original content site is the e-mail newsletter Very Short List, which sends out one item—a DVD, a book, an online video—per day to a young NPR demographic. Started by Kurt Andersen and IAC’s head of original programming, Michael Jackson, and now overseen by a single manager and an editorial advisory board, VSL is a personal favorite of Mr. Diller’s. “No exaggeration, since VSL started [in September 2006], I’m sure I have ordered more than 30, probably less than 50, items,” Mr. Diller said. “Without VSL I would be much diminished.” But just as 23/6 is kind of an ersatz Onion or Daily Show, so VSL is kind of an ersatz Daily Candy for smarter people and a national audience. And though its earnest general manager, Gary Foodim, assured The Observer that plans are in the works for additional brand extensions (he declined to be more specific, though he hinted that the site might branch out into, say, specific e-mail lists for music lovers, film enthusiasts and the like), it remains to be seen whether VSL will ever be more than a quirky curator.

And so that gets to the question of influence, and whether Mr. Diller and Mr. Jackson will be able to create from scratch the type of online content phenomenon that will make the kind of cultural impact that it seems Mr. Diller still craves. “In terms of your target market, you want to be a part of their conversation,” Mr. Jackson told The Observer. And it’s that kind of measurement, the kind that is related yet also divorced from financial statements, that right now seems most elusive.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President