Interview Editor Ingrid Sischy Quits

sandrabrantingridsischy Interview Editor Ingrid Sischy Quits Interview editor Ingrid Sischy has quit. Women’s Wear Daily first reported it this evening and a spokesman for Ms. Sischy confirmed the news to Media Mob.

Ms. Sischy’s departure from the magazine was reported by Gawker on Jan. 10, but a spokeswoman denied that rumor to Media Mob and the executive editor of Interview denied it to Gawker, forcing them to later run a correction.

Updates to come.

UPDATE: Ms. Sischy’s spokesman has sent out a press release. In it, Ms. Sischy said she resigned today because Sandra Brant, CEO and publisher of Interview’s parent company Brant Publications, sold her 50 percent stake in the company to co-owner and her ex-husband Peter Brant this afternoon.

"With Sandra Brant’s decision to sell her interest in Brant Publications, it is only appropriate that I resign at this time. Sandy and I have worked together as a team, and that has been a huge part of the fun of it," she wrote.

"When I was first drafted as editor after Andy Warhol’s death I thought I’d stay a few years, devote myself to helping the magazine find its post-Warhol life, and then get back to my writing. Although leaving the magazine and wonderful staff behind is difficult, it is the right decision and one that will allow the new owners to establish their own editorial stamp on the magazine. I am now more than ever, eager to get back to my writing and have several big projects in front of me that need my attention."

“Managing such an important part of Andy Warhol’s legacy has been a huge responsibility and I am proud of what Sandy and my editorial team have accomplished in terms of content and growth. I wish everyone the best of luck and hope this great American magazine will continue to flourish,” Sischy concluded.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President