Williamsburg Brokerage Owner: Prices Down '10 to 12 Percent' in '07

williamsburgcondo Williamsburg Brokerage Owner: Prices Down '10 to 12 Percent' in '07The owner of one of Williamsburg’s biggest brokerage firms, Aptsandlofts.com, said that the Corcoran Group‘s 2007 market report was "wrong" in estimating that the average price of a condo in the neighborhood had increased 8 percent since 2006.

David Maundrell told The Observer on Friday afternoon that "there was no way" that the average price of a condo in the Williamsburg market had risen from $817,000 in 2006 to $880,000 in 2007, as the Corcoran report concludes.

"Their data is wrong. We’ve seen the market come down 10 to 12 percent across the board since it peaked in the beggining of 2006," he said.

"Prices were astronomically high, even inflated so they had to come down," Mr. Maundrell explained of the causes for the slump. "Plus there has been a lot more development and competition, and sales were also impacted by [interest] rates, which helped the rental market in 2007."

Overall the Williamsburg/Greenpoint condo market is doing "OK," according to Mr. Maundrell. There was still demand for apartments in large-scale developments and luxury condominiums in 2007, he said, buyers were just taking more time to close. Meanwhle apartments in buildings with fewer than 20 units fared poorly in 2007 and co-ops in the neighborhood remain "very difficult to sell."

The housing market was comparatively strong last year, and Mr. Maundrell said townhouses in Williamsburg and Greenpoint were undervalued in 2007, because people are attracted to the amenities offered at luxury residential buildings.

"Buying a townhouse in Williamsburg is a fantastic deal, but there’s just not a lot of inventory," he said. "We just sold a three-family townhouse on the second stop of the L for $1.35 million."

More residential development in Williamsburg could even push prices down, said Brooklyn blogger Jonathan Butler, founder of Brownstoner. "You would think Williamsburg would be feeling more pressure now," he said. "Why come in now, when you know that a lot more apartments are coming?"

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President