Bruce Ratner Buys Brownstone, But (Surprise!) It's Not In Brooklyn

ratnerbrownstone Bruce Ratner Buys Brownstone, But (Surprise!) It's Not In BrooklynOne might have assumed that New York Nets co-owner Bruce Ratner does not adore the pettite charm of brownstones. After all, his planned 8 million-square-foot, 22-acre Atlantic Yards, which would be one of the biggest projects ever built by a single developer in New York, has been called "a nightmare for Brooklyn" because of its massive bouquet of Frank Gehry-designed skyscrapers.

But, according to city records, Mr. Ratner just bought himself a nice little 20-foot-wide, 6,408-square-foot, five-floor brownstone, exactly the kind that Brooklynites like so much. But it’s on the Upper East Side.

On Valentine’s Day, Mr. Ratner paid $6,965,000 for 128 East 62nd Street. More than half of the townhouse was owned by the Neustadt Collection of Tiffany Glass, founded by the late Dr. Egon Neustadt–who used to live in the house with some of his 300,000-piece Tiffany collection, according to Milton Hassol, the musuem’s president.

But the building was split into co-op apartments, some that weren’t owned by Neustadt, which meant the museum couldn’t sell the townhouse until it owned two-thirds of the house. Once that happened, according to Mr. Hassol, the other two owners in the building (listed as Charles Nemetz and Diane Harris) were forced to sell as well. “They had to by law, but people can hold you up and make it difficult–but they cooperated.”

According to records, the museum got over $5 million, while Ms. Harris got $571,130 and Mr. Nemetz $1,309,420. Incidentally, the deal was finished less than three weeks after the U.S. Court of Appeals supported Mr. Ratner’s right to use eminent domain in acquiring property that will be part of Atlantic Yards. “Today’s decision is more than another victory for Atlantic Yards," he said then. “It is a victory for public good.”

Mr. Hassol said he thought the buyer would be turning the house into a single-family brownstone for himself, but Mr. Ratner did not return The Observer’s email asking about his plans.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President