Farewell, Ally McBeal, Enter the Litigatrix

lat tilda swinton michael c Farewell, Ally McBeal, Enter the LitigatrixWhatever happened to Ally McBeal? If recent movies and television shows are any guide, the life of a female lawyer has gotten a lot less pleasant since the carefree, charmingly neurotic days of dancing babies and bathroom kisses. But today’s portrayals may be more accurate, and certainly more critically acclaimed.

Last January, Glenn Close won a Golden Globe for her compelling performance as Patty Hewes, a fearsome and wildly successful plaintiff’s lawyer, on the addictive TV show Damages. The following month, Tilda Swinton snagged an Oscar for stepping into the pumps of Karen Crowder, a hard-charging in-house litigator, in Michael Clayton.

In March, Julianna Margulies (of ER) returned to television as aggressive defense lawyer Elizabeth Canterbury, the title character of Canterbury’s Law. Even Katey Sagal, who embodied the famously vulgar Peggy Bundy on Married With Children, reincarnated herself this year as Marci Klein, the sleek, powerful, and ruthless founding partner of the law firm on Eli Stone.

All of these actresses play litigators, even though real-life litigation is a male-dominated field (the analog in medicine might be surgery, or even orthopedic surgery). And they’re portrayals of not just any old female litigator, but a specific type: the Litigatrix.

Who is the Litigatrix? On the plus side, she’s supremely confident and competent. The Litigatrix is very good at her job, and she knows it. Above all, she’s strong-willed and tough—a woman making her way in a man’s world. Of course, these are buzzwords that trigger other, more familiar characterizations.

The Fox Web site describes Elizabeth Canterbury, the “rebellious female defense attorney” played by Julianna Margulies, as “a force of nature.” Similarly, the FX Web site touts Glenn Close’s Patty Hewes, “the nation’s most revered and most reviled litigator,” as “hard-hitting” and “Machiavellian.”

Let’s not mince words: the Litigatrix is a bitch. She didn’t excel in litigation’s testosterone-soaked precincts by playing nice. Like that other professional “-ix,” the dominatrix, the Litigatrix knows how to crack a whip. Making men feel pain is part of her job description.

The Litigatrix archetype is not new. She has been with us at least since the late 1980s, when Diana Muldaur played the despised Rosalind Shays on L.A. Law (who met an untimely end by plummeting down an empty elevator shaft, to the perverse pleasure of many viewers). But the Litigatrix does appear to be experiencing something of a renaissance or cultural moment right now.


WHAT DO TODAY’S actual female litigators make of this portrayal?

Anne Vladeck is one of New York’s top labor and employment lawyers; last year, she successfully represented Anucha Browne Sanders in her sexual harassment lawsuit against Isiah Thomas and Madison Square Garden.

Does Ms. Vladeck buy Glenn Close’s portrayal of a prominent female plaintiff’s lawyer? “I don’t know anybody like her,” Ms. Vladeck said. “I’d probably run like hell if I did.”

But most women I spoke with said these characters did get a lot of things right.

Tilda Swinton’s star turn as Karen Crowder, in-house counsel to a Big Evil Corporation defending itself against charges that it essentially poisoned people by selling a toxic weed killer (which, it turns out, it did), got high marks for accuracy.

“I thought it the most realistic representation yet,” said a female civil litigator at a prominent New York law firm. “First you throw up, then you order someone to kill someone. We’re asked to do terrible things, and we get them done. Her character is kind of evil, but being a litigator is kind of evil.

“Tilda Swinton was awesome,” she continued. “They didn’t give her a backstory. She was married to her job, and I thought that was pretty realistic. She wasn’t slayed by [George] Clooney’s good looks, she wasn’t redeemable, she was just a corporate lawyer.”

Others viewed Ms. Swinton’s character as more to be pitied than admired. Karen Crowder is “a depiction of the woman who has lost her mind in pursuing a successful legal career,” said a female white-collar-criminal defense lawyer at a large New York-area firm.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President