<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Former Wired Editor: We Could&#8217;ve Been Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2008/05/former-iwiredi-editor-we-couldve-been-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Former Wired Editor: We Could&#8217;ve Been Google</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/05/former-iwiredi-editor-we-couldve-been-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:56:52 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/05/former-iwiredi-editor-we-couldve-been-google/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/05/former-iwiredi-editor-we-couldve-been-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As part of its 15th anniversary celebration, <em>Wired</em> has posted a few <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2008/01/st_15index">videos and articles</a> in which its founders look back at what they got right and wrong in the early days of the magazine.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One of the <a href="http://video.wired.com/?fr_story=FRdamp273073&amp;rf=bm">videos</a> features the magazine's former executive editor, <a href="http://www.kk.org/">Kevin Kelly</a>, whom <em>The New York Times Magazine</em> <a href="http://www.tc.umn.edu/~jbshank/Digerati!.html">described</a> in May 1995 as &quot;<em>Wired</em>'s Big Think guy&quot; (&quot;'the balloon we follow around,' as one staffer calls him&quot;). In it, Kelly speculates on what the magazine and its Web sites might've become had the print side not been sold to Condé Nast in <a href="http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/05/08featureb.html">1998</a> and Wired News not been sold to Lycos in <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2006/07/71366">1999</a>. (The two divisions were reunited in 2006 under the Condé Nast umbrella):</p>
<div class="oldbq">From the very beginning Wired believed in the digital platform as a publishing platform. And from the very beginning believed that the web would be a commercial medium, that it would run on advertising. And from the very beginning, Wired believed in 'search.'... I believe that had Wired not been divided and sold that we might have actually arrived at the same place that Google had.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.03/google.html">Win some</a>; <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/19980201/867.html">lose some</a>.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of its 15th anniversary celebration, <em>Wired</em> has posted a few <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2008/01/st_15index">videos and articles</a> in which its founders look back at what they got right and wrong in the early days of the magazine.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One of the <a href="http://video.wired.com/?fr_story=FRdamp273073&amp;rf=bm">videos</a> features the magazine's former executive editor, <a href="http://www.kk.org/">Kevin Kelly</a>, whom <em>The New York Times Magazine</em> <a href="http://www.tc.umn.edu/~jbshank/Digerati!.html">described</a> in May 1995 as &quot;<em>Wired</em>'s Big Think guy&quot; (&quot;'the balloon we follow around,' as one staffer calls him&quot;). In it, Kelly speculates on what the magazine and its Web sites might've become had the print side not been sold to Condé Nast in <a href="http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/05/08featureb.html">1998</a> and Wired News not been sold to Lycos in <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2006/07/71366">1999</a>. (The two divisions were reunited in 2006 under the Condé Nast umbrella):</p>
<div class="oldbq">From the very beginning Wired believed in the digital platform as a publishing platform. And from the very beginning believed that the web would be a commercial medium, that it would run on advertising. And from the very beginning, Wired believed in 'search.'... I believe that had Wired not been divided and sold that we might have actually arrived at the same place that Google had.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.03/google.html">Win some</a>; <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/19980201/867.html">lose some</a>.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/05/former-iwiredi-editor-we-couldve-been-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
