The Tough Road to Beijing

beijing080708 The Tough Road to Beijing

Welcome to the Olympics! If you’re one of the 20,000+ journalists covering the games, you’ve probably arrived. But boy, it hasn’t been easy getting there. Over the past week, The Observer spoke to reporters and editors about their headaches getting credentials in Beijing.

"One day, they’ll e-mail us and ask for certain information and the next day, after we raised a question as to why, then it changes," said Tom Jolly, The New York Times sports editor. "This is mostly silly stuff—like requests for photos for credentials because there was a blue background instead of a white background. That literally happened."

"I think the biggest problem is set from the language barrier," said Fran Turkowitz, the assistant to the Times’ sports department who’s in charge of credentialing. "They really seemed like they wanted to please, but I don’t think they understood how."

"We had problems in Athens due to the language barrier but it was easier to find people who were fluent in English than in Beijing," she continued. "Everyone there is weak in their language—they try, but eventually you get everything you want but you have to word it a little differently."

It got so confusing that after a while even the implausible seems possible:"There was a request—not just for us, but for all visiting media—to register all electronic equipment and we got that in the last week," said Mr. Jolly. "Initially, there was a moment where we said, ‘Oh my God, are they talking about iPods and cell phones?’ There was a momentary fuss raised by a number of people in the media, and we soon discovered it was just a communication issue where they wanted to register the kind of equipment that would be used in daily coverage. If we’re bringing in a shipment of video equipment they want serial numbers, which is not typical, either."

"They’re sticklers for detail," Ms. Turkowitz said. "They sent out a credentialing manual, a book when we started the process. Everyone does it, but they were very particular about the photos. Next to it there was a sign: This is right, this is wrong. If there was a glare on the glasses—they wouldn’t want it. They want everything simple. So everything matched, so the pictures matched—if it’s a glare on your glasses, maybe they wouldn’t know who you are? No hats, either!"

Then once you get there, as The Observer noted this week, there is a noticeable class system for reporters: yellow credentials or blue credentials. The big, new press center versus the renovated hotel. It’s the difference between seeing the games and being offered a chance to buy a single ticket for a single event.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President