Are Video Game Tie-Ins the Future of Books?

player100608 Are Video Game Tie Ins the Future of Books?The New York Times this morning has the second in reporter Motoko Rich’s series on the future of reading, focusing this time on video games and whether they are making kids more or less likely to enjoy reading books.

The most interesting part of the piece concerns kids’ series like Scholastic’s The 39 Clues, Book One: Maze of Bones that come with multimedia tie-ins that are only slightly secondary to the books themselves. While some of these experiments might be no more than marketing gimmicks, Ms. Rich writes, there are those who believe that some of them "may push creative boundaries" and "extend storytelling beyond the traditional covers of a book."

One wonders what Heroes creator Tim Kring and his new friend Dale Peck would say about all this in relation to the project they’re working on, an alternate history thriller series distinctly not just for kids that will be accompanied—the way TV shows like Heroes and Lost have been—by an immersive alternate reality game (ARG) that readers can participate in online. Publishers showed enormous interest in Kring and Peck’s project when it was pitched to them back in April; Crown, the imprint of Random House that ended up securing the rights, paid $3 million for it.

Another interesting figure who could weigh in on this stuff is former Hyperion editor-in-chief Will Schwalbe, who retired from traditional publishing earlier this year to pursue a project rumored to involve some fusion of books and video games.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President