<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; From Topical to Timeless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2008/12/from-topical-to-timeless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>From Topical to Timeless</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/12/from-topical-to-timeless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:52:18 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/12/from-topical-to-timeless/</link>
			<dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/12/from-topical-to-timeless/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/naves_17.jpg?w=240&h=300" />In an interview with Thelma Golden, director of the Studio Museum in Harlem, the painter Barkley L. Hendricks states that there aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;too many contemporary painters I get inspiration from.&rdquo; Ms. Golden, citing Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; in the art scene, seems taken aback. He has, after all, benefited from a marketplace that currently smiles upon figurative art. Money, it would seem, has made Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; stark brand of portraiture relevant.</p>
<p class="text">Or, at least, au courant. Given the laconic expression in <em>Slick (Self-Portrait)</em> (1977), Mr. Hendricks probably views this development with no small measure of bemusement. He knows the convolutions of fashion. Mr.</p>
<p>In an interview with Thelma Golden, director of the Studio Museum in Harlem, the painter Barkley L. Hendricks states that there aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;too many contemporary painters I get inspiration from.&rdquo; Ms. Golden, citing Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; in the art scene, seems taken aback. He has, after all, benefited from a marketplace that currently smiles upon figurative art. Money, it would seem, has made Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; stark brand of portraiture relevant.</p>
<p class="text">Or, at least, au courant. Given the laconic expression in <em>Slick (Self-Portrait)</em> (1977), Mr. Hendricks probably views this development with no small measure of bemusement. He knows the convolutions of fashion. Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; art came into its own some 40 years ago and shortly thereafter gained in renown. As someone who once appeared in an advertisement for Dewar&rsquo;s Scotch, he&rsquo;s experienced &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; firsthand.</p>
<p class="text"><em>Birth of the Cool</em>&mdash;the title comes from Miles Davis&rsquo; seminal LP&mdash;is a selective overview of Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; art at the Studio Museum. He&rsquo;s made still lifes, watercolors, photos, assemblages and (huh?) black light drawings, but it&rsquo;s portrait paintings for which he&rsquo;s best known&mdash;and rightfully so: They&rsquo;re assured, taut and true. The work&rsquo;s in-your-face immediacy is startling, but that&rsquo;s not all. Each picture unfolds with, yes, cool deliberation.</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; subjects are painted life size, maybe a little larger. They&rsquo;re rendered with consummate skill: Mr. Hendricks applies paint with deadpan economy. Rigorous attention is paid to likeness, as is conveying the specifics of gesture, attitude, fashion and, if not necessarily character, then type. To a significant extent, raiment takes precedence. Mr. Hendricks isn&rsquo;t an effusive temperament; nonetheless, you can feel the pleasure he takes in limning wide collars, hot pants or the sloping overcoat in <em>Steve</em> (1976).</p>
<p class="text">Associations peculiar to the period&mdash;the late 1960s and early &rsquo;70s&mdash;abound: Try <em>not</em> thinking <em>Superfly</em> or recalling then-burgeoning Afrocentrism. Politics are alluded to&mdash;<em>Icon for My Man Superman (Superman never saved any black people&mdash;Bobby Seale)</em> (1969), for instance, or in the oddly beatific visage of a Vietnam-era soldier in <em>FTA</em> (1968). The work evinces an artist peculiarly aware of, and not unamused by, the sociological and historical ramifications in painting black Americans. As catalog essayist Richard J. Powell notes, Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; perplexing interest in stereotypes reveals an intellect attuned to devastating ironies.</p>
<p class="text">All the same, Mr. Hendricks is a pure painter. Though his figures are representational, the space in which they are situated is not: Each is surrounded by expanses of flat and uninflected color. The abrupt disconnect between figure and ground recalls Byzantine icons&mdash;<em>Lawdy Mama</em> (1969), with its domed format and field of metallic gold, is a blatant reference&mdash;and, in the work&rsquo;s billboardlike punch, Pop Art. Some may want to lump Mr. Hendricks in with Photorealism, but, as an artist trained in working directly from life, mechanical reproduction isn&rsquo;t an overriding concern. It&rsquo;s the <em>actual</em> he&rsquo;s after.</p>
<p class="text">A daunting concentration to detail worthy of Netherlandish painters can be seen in the studio windows reflected in the sunglasses worn by Mr. Hendricks in <em>Slick</em>. But relentless pictorial honing can make him seem an abstract painter. Mr. Hendricks carefully situates each model within the parameters of the canvas; the way they&rsquo;re juxtaposed within its edges is exacting, as are his subtle elisions in color. In <em>What Goes On</em> (1974), Mr. Hendricks orchestrates white ground, white clothing and brown skin to thrilling effect. Somewhere, Malevich is smiling.</p>
<p class="text">Ms. Golden describes Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; achievement as &ldquo;somewhat timeless.&rdquo; <em>Somewhat?</em> What a curious aside. Artists play for keeps; their work thrives long after its historical context has come and gone. Mr. Hendricks is wise to this truth. His great loves are timeless through and through: Rembrandt and Caravaggio. In fundamental ways, they&rsquo;re Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; true contemporaries. <em>Birth of the Cool</em> is a long overdue recognition of what is likely to be a timeless achievement. In the short term, it&rsquo;s wry, pointed and something to see.</p>
<p class="Tagline">&ldquo;Barkley L. Hendricks: Birth of the Cool&rdquo; is at the Studio Museum in Harlem, 144 West 125th Street, until March 15.</p>
<p class="text">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Wan and Icky</strong></p>
<p class="text">Fans of Egon Schiele, Joy Division and heroin chic&mdash;which is to say, narcissism, gloom, the sleek and sickly&mdash;will discover a kindred soul in the South African&ndash;born painter Marlene Dumas. Using a palette keyed to gritty runs of black, Ms. Dumas devotes herself to childhood, international politics, childbirth and porno&mdash;all of which are rendered wan and icky, chilly and denatured. Ruminations on memory and mortality are undercut by glib theatrics: Ms. Dumas&rsquo; brush glances off brutal images as if insouciance were the same as outrage or tissue paper the same as flesh-and-bone.</p>
<p class="Tagline">&ldquo;Marlene Dumas: Measuring Your Own Grave&rdquo; is at MoMA, 11 West 53rd Street, until Feb. 16.</p>
<p class="emailtagline" style="text-align: left" align="left"><em>mnaves@observer.com</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/naves_17.jpg?w=240&h=300" />In an interview with Thelma Golden, director of the Studio Museum in Harlem, the painter Barkley L. Hendricks states that there aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;too many contemporary painters I get inspiration from.&rdquo; Ms. Golden, citing Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; in the art scene, seems taken aback. He has, after all, benefited from a marketplace that currently smiles upon figurative art. Money, it would seem, has made Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; stark brand of portraiture relevant.</p>
<p class="text">Or, at least, au courant. Given the laconic expression in <em>Slick (Self-Portrait)</em> (1977), Mr. Hendricks probably views this development with no small measure of bemusement. He knows the convolutions of fashion. Mr.</p>
<p>In an interview with Thelma Golden, director of the Studio Museum in Harlem, the painter Barkley L. Hendricks states that there aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;too many contemporary painters I get inspiration from.&rdquo; Ms. Golden, citing Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; in the art scene, seems taken aback. He has, after all, benefited from a marketplace that currently smiles upon figurative art. Money, it would seem, has made Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; stark brand of portraiture relevant.</p>
<p class="text">Or, at least, au courant. Given the laconic expression in <em>Slick (Self-Portrait)</em> (1977), Mr. Hendricks probably views this development with no small measure of bemusement. He knows the convolutions of fashion. Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; art came into its own some 40 years ago and shortly thereafter gained in renown. As someone who once appeared in an advertisement for Dewar&rsquo;s Scotch, he&rsquo;s experienced &ldquo;resonance&rdquo; firsthand.</p>
<p class="text"><em>Birth of the Cool</em>&mdash;the title comes from Miles Davis&rsquo; seminal LP&mdash;is a selective overview of Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; art at the Studio Museum. He&rsquo;s made still lifes, watercolors, photos, assemblages and (huh?) black light drawings, but it&rsquo;s portrait paintings for which he&rsquo;s best known&mdash;and rightfully so: They&rsquo;re assured, taut and true. The work&rsquo;s in-your-face immediacy is startling, but that&rsquo;s not all. Each picture unfolds with, yes, cool deliberation.</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; subjects are painted life size, maybe a little larger. They&rsquo;re rendered with consummate skill: Mr. Hendricks applies paint with deadpan economy. Rigorous attention is paid to likeness, as is conveying the specifics of gesture, attitude, fashion and, if not necessarily character, then type. To a significant extent, raiment takes precedence. Mr. Hendricks isn&rsquo;t an effusive temperament; nonetheless, you can feel the pleasure he takes in limning wide collars, hot pants or the sloping overcoat in <em>Steve</em> (1976).</p>
<p class="text">Associations peculiar to the period&mdash;the late 1960s and early &rsquo;70s&mdash;abound: Try <em>not</em> thinking <em>Superfly</em> or recalling then-burgeoning Afrocentrism. Politics are alluded to&mdash;<em>Icon for My Man Superman (Superman never saved any black people&mdash;Bobby Seale)</em> (1969), for instance, or in the oddly beatific visage of a Vietnam-era soldier in <em>FTA</em> (1968). The work evinces an artist peculiarly aware of, and not unamused by, the sociological and historical ramifications in painting black Americans. As catalog essayist Richard J. Powell notes, Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; perplexing interest in stereotypes reveals an intellect attuned to devastating ironies.</p>
<p class="text">All the same, Mr. Hendricks is a pure painter. Though his figures are representational, the space in which they are situated is not: Each is surrounded by expanses of flat and uninflected color. The abrupt disconnect between figure and ground recalls Byzantine icons&mdash;<em>Lawdy Mama</em> (1969), with its domed format and field of metallic gold, is a blatant reference&mdash;and, in the work&rsquo;s billboardlike punch, Pop Art. Some may want to lump Mr. Hendricks in with Photorealism, but, as an artist trained in working directly from life, mechanical reproduction isn&rsquo;t an overriding concern. It&rsquo;s the <em>actual</em> he&rsquo;s after.</p>
<p class="text">A daunting concentration to detail worthy of Netherlandish painters can be seen in the studio windows reflected in the sunglasses worn by Mr. Hendricks in <em>Slick</em>. But relentless pictorial honing can make him seem an abstract painter. Mr. Hendricks carefully situates each model within the parameters of the canvas; the way they&rsquo;re juxtaposed within its edges is exacting, as are his subtle elisions in color. In <em>What Goes On</em> (1974), Mr. Hendricks orchestrates white ground, white clothing and brown skin to thrilling effect. Somewhere, Malevich is smiling.</p>
<p class="text">Ms. Golden describes Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; achievement as &ldquo;somewhat timeless.&rdquo; <em>Somewhat?</em> What a curious aside. Artists play for keeps; their work thrives long after its historical context has come and gone. Mr. Hendricks is wise to this truth. His great loves are timeless through and through: Rembrandt and Caravaggio. In fundamental ways, they&rsquo;re Mr. Hendricks&rsquo; true contemporaries. <em>Birth of the Cool</em> is a long overdue recognition of what is likely to be a timeless achievement. In the short term, it&rsquo;s wry, pointed and something to see.</p>
<p class="Tagline">&ldquo;Barkley L. Hendricks: Birth of the Cool&rdquo; is at the Studio Museum in Harlem, 144 West 125th Street, until March 15.</p>
<p class="text">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Wan and Icky</strong></p>
<p class="text">Fans of Egon Schiele, Joy Division and heroin chic&mdash;which is to say, narcissism, gloom, the sleek and sickly&mdash;will discover a kindred soul in the South African&ndash;born painter Marlene Dumas. Using a palette keyed to gritty runs of black, Ms. Dumas devotes herself to childhood, international politics, childbirth and porno&mdash;all of which are rendered wan and icky, chilly and denatured. Ruminations on memory and mortality are undercut by glib theatrics: Ms. Dumas&rsquo; brush glances off brutal images as if insouciance were the same as outrage or tissue paper the same as flesh-and-bone.</p>
<p class="Tagline">&ldquo;Marlene Dumas: Measuring Your Own Grave&rdquo; is at MoMA, 11 West 53rd Street, until Feb. 16.</p>
<p class="emailtagline" style="text-align: left" align="left"><em>mnaves@observer.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/12/from-topical-to-timeless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/naves_17.jpg?w=240&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
