<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; New Trailer for 9 Points to Alarming Trend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2009/01/new-trailer-for-i9i-points-to-alarming-trend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>New Trailer for 9 Points to Alarming Trend</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/01/new-trailer-for-i9i-points-to-alarming-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:11:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/01/new-trailer-for-i9i-points-to-alarming-trend/</link>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/01/new-trailer-for-i9i-points-to-alarming-trend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The year is only five days old and we've already found the statement that will be our bête noir for 2009: <em>from the visionary director of</em>. To be fair, this unhappy turn of events started last year with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slj55jYuMro">trailer for Zack Snyder's adaptation of <em>Watchmen</em></a>, which proclaimed with soul-crushing gravitas that the film was from &quot;the visionary director of <em>300</em>&quot;. Now, we've seen <em>300</em>, and in addition to being pure dreck, there isn't an original bone in its running time. <em>Gladiator</em>, <em>Sin City</em>, <em>Braveheart</em>, <em>Kingdom of Heaven</em>; you name the movie and chances are that Mr. Snyder has borrowed something from it. And while we're as amped as the next geek for <em>Watchmen</em>--assuming that Warner Brothers and Fox can iron out a deal so the release isn't held up indefinitely--the previous works of Mr. Snyder don't deserve to be hailed as visionary either. As entertaining as his remake of <em>Dawn of the Dead</em> was, we don't think anyone would describe it as being marked by <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/visionary">&quot;foresight or imagination&quot;</a>. It was a <em>remake</em> after all!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/focus_features/9/">Now comes the trailer for the animated film <em>9</em></a> from first time feature director, and apparent &quot;visionary&quot;, Shane Acker. Executive produced by Tim Burton (yay!) and <em>Wanted </em>director Timur Bekmanbetov (nay!), <em>9</em> is based on Mr. Acker's Academy Award nominated 2005 short of the same name. And while the trailer is fun--why hasn't anyone used the prog-rock of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEsnX4utdyQ">Coheed &amp; Cambria</a> before to underscore action mayhem?--it looks too derivative of <em>Wall-E</em>, except redrawn with the Tusken Raiders from <em>Star Wars</em>, for us to consider it truly noteworthy. Even if <em>9 </em>holds secrets that make it the greatest leap forward in animation since <em>Toy Story</em>, isn't it a little presumptuous to call Mr. Acker a &quot;visionary director&quot;? This is his first movie! Not even Orson Welles would have been hailed as such during the trailers for <em>Citizen Kane</em>. </p>
<p>At this rate, what are they going to call Christopher Nolan during the trailer for his next movie? &quot;Transcendent&quot;? &quot;Incendiary&quot;? &quot;Messianic&quot;? It might be a little late for resolutions, but here's hoping the Hollywood marketing departments save their hyperbole for filmmakers who actually deserve it. Otherwise, it won't be long before we see a movie <em>from the visionary director of Transporter 3</em>...</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year is only five days old and we've already found the statement that will be our bête noir for 2009: <em>from the visionary director of</em>. To be fair, this unhappy turn of events started last year with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slj55jYuMro">trailer for Zack Snyder's adaptation of <em>Watchmen</em></a>, which proclaimed with soul-crushing gravitas that the film was from &quot;the visionary director of <em>300</em>&quot;. Now, we've seen <em>300</em>, and in addition to being pure dreck, there isn't an original bone in its running time. <em>Gladiator</em>, <em>Sin City</em>, <em>Braveheart</em>, <em>Kingdom of Heaven</em>; you name the movie and chances are that Mr. Snyder has borrowed something from it. And while we're as amped as the next geek for <em>Watchmen</em>--assuming that Warner Brothers and Fox can iron out a deal so the release isn't held up indefinitely--the previous works of Mr. Snyder don't deserve to be hailed as visionary either. As entertaining as his remake of <em>Dawn of the Dead</em> was, we don't think anyone would describe it as being marked by <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/visionary">&quot;foresight or imagination&quot;</a>. It was a <em>remake</em> after all!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/focus_features/9/">Now comes the trailer for the animated film <em>9</em></a> from first time feature director, and apparent &quot;visionary&quot;, Shane Acker. Executive produced by Tim Burton (yay!) and <em>Wanted </em>director Timur Bekmanbetov (nay!), <em>9</em> is based on Mr. Acker's Academy Award nominated 2005 short of the same name. And while the trailer is fun--why hasn't anyone used the prog-rock of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEsnX4utdyQ">Coheed &amp; Cambria</a> before to underscore action mayhem?--it looks too derivative of <em>Wall-E</em>, except redrawn with the Tusken Raiders from <em>Star Wars</em>, for us to consider it truly noteworthy. Even if <em>9 </em>holds secrets that make it the greatest leap forward in animation since <em>Toy Story</em>, isn't it a little presumptuous to call Mr. Acker a &quot;visionary director&quot;? This is his first movie! Not even Orson Welles would have been hailed as such during the trailers for <em>Citizen Kane</em>. </p>
<p>At this rate, what are they going to call Christopher Nolan during the trailer for his next movie? &quot;Transcendent&quot;? &quot;Incendiary&quot;? &quot;Messianic&quot;? It might be a little late for resolutions, but here's hoping the Hollywood marketing departments save their hyperbole for filmmakers who actually deserve it. Otherwise, it won't be long before we see a movie <em>from the visionary director of Transporter 3</em>...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/01/new-trailer-for-i9i-points-to-alarming-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
