<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Stop The Presses: The Atlantic Wonders If The New York Times Could Cease Printing in May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2009/01/stop-the-presses-ithe-atlantici-wonders-if-ithe-new-york-timesi-could-cease-printing-in-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Stop The Presses: The Atlantic Wonders If The New York Times Could Cease Printing in May</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/01/stop-the-presses-ithe-atlantici-wonders-if-ithe-new-york-timesi-could-cease-printing-in-may/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:05:47 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/01/stop-the-presses-ithe-atlantici-wonders-if-ithe-new-york-timesi-could-cease-printing-in-may/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/01/stop-the-presses-ithe-atlantici-wonders-if-ithe-new-york-timesi-could-cease-printing-in-may/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/times10609.jpg?w=300&h=185" />In the January/February issue of <em>The Atlantic</em>, columnist <a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/mr-bad-taste">Michael Hirschorn</a> looks at <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200901/new-york-times">the future of <em>The New York Times</em></a> and wonders, &quot;[W]hat if the old media dies much more quickly? ... [W]hat if <em>The New York Times</em> goes out of business—like, this May?&quot;</p>
<p>Mr. Hirschorn looks at the Times Company's difficult year—and its possibly even more difficult year ahead—before concluding that:</p>
<div class="oldbq">Regardless of what happens over the next few months, <em>The Times</em> is destined for significant and traumatic change. At some point soon—sooner than most of us think—the print edition, and with it <em>The Times</em> as we know it, will no longer exist.</div>
<p>What would that mean for readers? Mr. Hirschorn writes:
<div class="oldbq">For those of us old enough to still care about going out on a Sunday morning for our doorstop edition of <em>The Times</em>, it will mean the end of a certain kind of civilized ritual that has defined most of our adult lives. It will also mean the end of a certain kind of quasi-bohemian urban existence for the thousands of smart middle-class writers, journalists, and public intellectuals who have, until now, lived semi-charmed kinds of lives of the mind.</div>
<p>Twelve year-old <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=087pjPX3z_8">Third Eye Blind references</a> aside, Mr. Hirschorn sees a future digital-only edition of the paper that looks a lot like <a href="http://huffingtonpost.com">The Huffington Post</a>, which he describes as &quot;the prototype for the future of journalism: a healthy dose of aggregation, a wide range of contributors, and a growing offering of original reporting.&quot; (We assume however, that this hypothetical future <em>Times</em> would pay its contributors, unlike the current, actual Huffington Post.)
<p>Under this digital-only scenario, Mr. Hirschorn speculates that 80 percent of the paper's staff might be laid off, but he also predicts that some <em>Times</em>men and -women like <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/thomaslfriedman/index.html">Thomas Friedman</a>, <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html">Paul Krugman</a>, and <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/andrew_ross_sorkin/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Andrew Ross Sorkin</a> might &quot;succeed as independent operators,&quot; which might prove &quot;more profitable than fighting as part of a union for an extra percentage-point raise in their next contract.&quot;</p>
<p>Will it happen? We'll tell you in May. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/times10609.jpg?w=300&h=185" />In the January/February issue of <em>The Atlantic</em>, columnist <a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/mr-bad-taste">Michael Hirschorn</a> looks at <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200901/new-york-times">the future of <em>The New York Times</em></a> and wonders, &quot;[W]hat if the old media dies much more quickly? ... [W]hat if <em>The New York Times</em> goes out of business—like, this May?&quot;</p>
<p>Mr. Hirschorn looks at the Times Company's difficult year—and its possibly even more difficult year ahead—before concluding that:</p>
<div class="oldbq">Regardless of what happens over the next few months, <em>The Times</em> is destined for significant and traumatic change. At some point soon—sooner than most of us think—the print edition, and with it <em>The Times</em> as we know it, will no longer exist.</div>
<p>What would that mean for readers? Mr. Hirschorn writes:
<div class="oldbq">For those of us old enough to still care about going out on a Sunday morning for our doorstop edition of <em>The Times</em>, it will mean the end of a certain kind of civilized ritual that has defined most of our adult lives. It will also mean the end of a certain kind of quasi-bohemian urban existence for the thousands of smart middle-class writers, journalists, and public intellectuals who have, until now, lived semi-charmed kinds of lives of the mind.</div>
<p>Twelve year-old <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=087pjPX3z_8">Third Eye Blind references</a> aside, Mr. Hirschorn sees a future digital-only edition of the paper that looks a lot like <a href="http://huffingtonpost.com">The Huffington Post</a>, which he describes as &quot;the prototype for the future of journalism: a healthy dose of aggregation, a wide range of contributors, and a growing offering of original reporting.&quot; (We assume however, that this hypothetical future <em>Times</em> would pay its contributors, unlike the current, actual Huffington Post.)
<p>Under this digital-only scenario, Mr. Hirschorn speculates that 80 percent of the paper's staff might be laid off, but he also predicts that some <em>Times</em>men and -women like <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/thomaslfriedman/index.html">Thomas Friedman</a>, <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html">Paul Krugman</a>, and <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/andrew_ross_sorkin/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Andrew Ross Sorkin</a> might &quot;succeed as independent operators,&quot; which might prove &quot;more profitable than fighting as part of a union for an extra percentage-point raise in their next contract.&quot;</p>
<p>Will it happen? We'll tell you in May. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/01/stop-the-presses-ithe-atlantici-wonders-if-ithe-new-york-timesi-could-cease-printing-in-may/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/times10609.jpg?w=300&#38;h=185" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
