From White Cubes to Ice Cubes

c dacostaeveryone is broke From White Cubes to Ice Cubes“Everyone is in strategizing mode,” Ed Winkleman said over the phone from his gallery in Chelsea. He was echoing a feeling expressed by many New York art dealers who specialize in introducing the work of young artists to the market. “I was at a San Francisco gallery in ’89 when things were bad,” said Michael Foley, another Chelsea dealer. “But this is prolonged and protracted.”

Like most businesses these days, art galleries are cutting corners (culling invitation lists to save on the cost of printing cards, reducing staff hours) and thinking hard about new ways of generating revenue. For some, especially those whose business depends on introducing young or little-known artists to the market, that means a departure from the discreet courtship between dealer and collector that makes the white cubes of Chelsea feel so charmingly indifferent to the casual visitor. Mr. Foley, perhaps more forthright than most in his marketing efforts, is in talks with another gallerist in his building about the possibility of joining forces to open a small, ground-level cafe. “We feel it would not only be lucrative,” said Mr. Foley, “but it would draw people to the building.”

Some gallerists have also noticed a change in Chelsea’s social atmosphere. A fizzy market made dealers competitive or indifferent to one another: “In Chelsea I worked in one of those big buildings with lot of galleries and there were only two other gallerists who ever came down to see our shows,” said dealer Benjamin Tisch, who left Chelsea last September to found his own gallery on the Lower East Side. But in a down market, dealers have more time on their hands:

“Suddenly, dealers have become more collegial than competitive,” said Jen Bekman, a Soho gallerist who has embraced Web marketing. “The general feeling is that people are getting friendly,” said Mr. Foley. “It’s an amazing thing—people are coming out of their galleries and having cocktails.”

Others argue that the culture of art-dealing is moving, inexorably, out of “meatspace” into the chilly confines of the World Wide Web. “Collectors are more comfortable purchasing from JPEGs,” Mr. Winkleman said. “There’s going to be lot less brick and mortar. You get the sense that everyone is waiting for the revolution.”

Get used to it, said gallerist Jen Bekman, unusual because of her background in online marketing for companies like Disney and Netscape. “The Web is a populist medium,” she said curtly. “The world is changing.”

And yet maybe the community could also use some historical perspective. Paul Morris, vice president of MMPI Art Group, remembered deciding “to play into the myth of the avant-garde,” as he put it, back in 1994, when he and two friends staged art openings at their respective Greenwich Village apartments on the same night; visitors were lured from one opening to the next by the promise of free artwork. The event captured the attention of New York Times art critic Roberta Smith, whose above-the-fold article on “micro-galleries” drew such a crowd to Mr. Morris’ apartment that he was forced to relocate his operation. Together with his business partner, Matthew Marks, Mr. Morris then started one of Chelsea’s first gallery spaces.

“A lot of these dealers have never negotiated a problem,” Mr. Morris said. “It’s about being creative.”

ddacosta@observer.com

 

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President