Bikes in Buildings Bill Gets Nod From Bloomberg Administration; REBNY Relaxes Opposition After Exemptions Added

sadikkhan 1 Bikes in Buildings Bill Gets Nod From Bloomberg Administration; REBNY Relaxes Opposition After Exemptions Added The Bloomberg administration has endorsed a long-discussed bill that would require landlords to allow tenants the right to bring bikes into commercial buildings. The endorsement was made Monday at a City Council hearing by Janette Sadik-Kahn, Mayor Bloomberg’s notably active transportation commissioner who is coating the city with fresh bike lanes.

The bill, which is supported by most of the City Council but has sat around without action since it was first introduced in 2003, was previously opposed by the Real Estate Board of New York, the powerful lobby that represents the city’s major landlords. But now the legislation has been modified—certain landlords can gain exemptions from the law—clearing the way for the administration’s support.

“I am happy to say that after considerable collaboration and exchanges of points of view, we have crafted bills that we believe will go a long way towards making bicycle commuting more feasible and attractive,” Ms. Sadik-Kahn said in prepared testimony. (More on the Council hearing here.)

Now, REBNY has retreated some from its hostile position, and, according to its president, Steve Spinola, the group is “looking at it.”

The revised bill “may work because it does permit you to get an exception,” he said.

The bill requires landlords with freight elevators to develop a “bicycle access plan” when a tenant requests bike access for its employees. To be exempt, a landlord would need to show that its freight elevators cannot be used for bicycles or that there is covered bike parking within three blocks of the building.

The Bloomberg administration also endorsed a bill that requires bike parking be built in parking garages.   

ebrown@observer.com

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President