Bloomberg’s Budget Deal: ‘No Major Cut,’ At Least for Now

budgetdeal222 Bloombergs Budget Deal: No Major Cut, At Least for NowMichael Bloomberg and the City Council agreed on a $59.4 billion city budget deal that squashes the mayor’s plan to shutter 16 fire companies, maintains current six-day services at libraries, prevents layoffs of child welfare workers, and trims by an unspecified margin the number of layoffs planned for other city workers.

“This is basically, as Chris said, preserving services,” Bloomberg said, referring to Council Speaker Christine Quinn, during an event with the Council in the City Hall rotunda this evening. “I don’t think there is any major cut that is going to really hurt anybody.”

But advocates gathered around City Hall quietly muttered to themselves and reporters the fear that whatever was placed into the budget could be stripped after the November elections, when Bloomberg and a majority of the Council are expected to be reelected.

“This may not be the last word on this year’s budget,” said Bloomberg, referring to projections that the national and local economies were projected to grow slightly in the months ahead.

One reporter asked if the budget deal was hammered out with the expectation that state lawmakers would grant the city’s request to create a new, cheaper Tier 5 pension benefit plan for future civil servants. Bloomberg said, “We are expecting and hoping that Albany helps us.”

The city is also banking on Albany to grant the city authority to levy new taxes—about $887 million’s worth. That’s coming in the form of an increased sales tax, plus “applying the city sales tax to currently untaxed energy purchases,” according to a press release from the mayor’s office.

Passage of those new tax hikes is not usually an easy task in Albany, but it is even trickier this year, given the chaos that has gripped the State Senate. Plus, state lawmakers already passed a tax hike on everyone making over $250,000 a year.

As Councilman Vincent Gentile was walking out of City Hall, he spotted Councilman Jimmy Vacca of the Bronx, who had been wearing red shirts and ties to raise awareness about the proposed fire house closings. Vacca, so far, has prevented those cuts, and told me he was glad to finally get out of wearing red for a while.

Gentile greeted him with a smile and told me, “He’s going to sleep well tonight.” Vacca smiled, nodded and said he hoped so.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President