C’mon, Get App-y: For Some iPhone Users, Profusion of Programs Is Just … Irritating

88578833 Cmon, Get App y: For Some iPhone Users, Profusion of Programs Is Just ... IrritatingOne of the key aspects in the marketing campaign for the iPhone 3G S, introduced on June 19, has been the availability of 50,000 applications, with prices for said applications (or “apps” as all the iPhone users call them) ranging from free (such as Google Earth, Cool Facts and fan-favorite Shabbat Shalom) to $449 (the infamous MyAccountsToGo Dynamics GD, which has no user reviews in the online App Store).

Yet despite the seemingly infinite possibilities, a surprising number of iPhone users choose to avoid applications altogether.

 “The iPhone is a communicator for phone, text and email,” said a 53-year-old self-proclaimed “spokesman for the baby boomer generation” who wished to remain anonymous.  “Even the Internet access is just nice to have, not a necessity.”

The sheer number of applications, apparently, can be daunting.  “There are too many apps to choose from,” the baby boomer said.  “It’s a real effort to look at them all and decide what I need.  Besides, many apps seem trivial and offer no value.”

Lest you think this aversion is generational, listen to David Klatt, 21, a student who cannot get app-y.  “I end up using one for a day and then get very bored,” he said of non-information apps (i.e., games).  “For information apps, I find it almost just as easy to go to my Internet browser and Google movie times and theaters instead of using a specific app for movies.  The only apps I have are ones that I (a) use a lot, like Facebook, Twitter and Pandora, and (b) run better than if I use an Internet browser.”

Juliette Stanton, a 47-year-old iPhone user who just moved to New York from St. Maarten and was found browsing at the Tekserve store on 23rd Street recently, has yet to download a single app.  “Eventually, I probably will,” she said.  “Maybe some apps [I’ll use], the rest I’ll forget about.”

Ms. Stanton’s stance on the matter directly correlates with a recent study analyzing the download rate and use of iPhone applications conducted by Pinch Media this past February. Research showed that only about 30 percent of application purchases are actually used.  Most iPhone users, like Mr. Klatt, buy an app, use it for a day, and then forget about it.  In fact, only 20 percent of users make use of free applications the day after purchase, and a mere 1 percent use them after 90 days.

Nathan Manley, 30, who has had an iPhone since September, has multiple pages of apps, yet really only uses six or seven regularly.  “I like to download them, try them out, and then I don’t use them again,” he said.

And Tekserve employee Anthony Regno, 27, is a longtime iPhone user with a multitude of apps (five pages worth, to be exact) … yet he rarely uses any.  “I mostly use the built-in Apple applications on the main page, so I don’t really use them at all.  Maybe once a month, if at all,”  Mr. Regno said. “People overindulge.”

But the question remains: Why bother wasting the time to search for apps if the most likely outcome is that they will go the way of Don Most—forgotten, but not quite gone?

“It’s analogous to diners at a restaurant who take a handful of toothpaste-tasting mints before leaving the premises,” offered the baby boomer.  “They don’t even like mints, but they’re free.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President