Dredging Up the Record in Jackson Heights

P1020105

City Councilwoman Helen Sears has put out this flier about her opponent, Danny Dromm.

Sears, who represents Jackson Heights, was having an easier time when she faced three challengers, who could have diluted the anti-incumbent vote against her. But one opponent, Alfonse Quirroz, dropped out and endorsed her, leaving her with one major opponent, Dromm, and one newcomer, Stanley Kalathara. Each has raised more than $100,000.

Dromm is a district leader, is openly gay, and has the support of the Working Families Party. He’s a pretty well-known commodity locally, and he handles himself well for a candidate of his experience level.

Sears, who was a district leader before her election, voted to extend term limits, isn’t much of a policy wonk and has a tendency to ramble. But she’s attentive to her district, and has and has the support of the Queens County organization, which still means something in that part of the county.

The district is among the most ethnically diverse in the city. This would be the place for a candidate like Kalathara to make a mark, but his accent is thick and could deny him the cross-over appeal candidates from emerging communities often need to win.

Much of the political fighting has been between Sears and Dromm.

Sears got into some hot water for not denouncing a whisper campaign that brought to light Dromm’s arrests when he was young, including one for “prostitution” when he was a teenager. The Empire State Pride Agenda, Council Speaker Christine Quinn–not normally one to provoke the Queens machine–denounced the whisper campaign against Dromm.

Sears did too, but not loudly or quickly enough for critics. This flier suggests that maybe she was never all that bothered by it in the first place. The manila folder covering Dromm’s face and the black-and-white Polaroid of him paper-clipped to the front of it resembles the kind of police files voters will have seen on cop shows, vaguely alluding to the whisper campaign that nobody ever took responsibility for.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President