Bill Lynch: ‘Giuliani Is Going Back to The Old Days’

One of the people Rudy Giuliani was aiming at when he talked to an audience of Jews in Brooklyn about the prospect of crime returning to 1993 levels was David Dinkins. (Dinkins, who was the mayor until the end of 1993, when he lost to Giuliani, hasn’t returned my call for comment.)

Another is Bill Lynch, who was Dinkins’ campaign manager and deputy mayor. He isn’t just upset about what Giuliani said, but also about what Bloomberg hasn’t said.

“What I’m really concerned about is the mayor is silent on this. When he became, when he was elected mayor, back eight years ago, he kind of distanced himself” from this kind of rhetoric, Lynch told me in an interview just now. “And it looks like Giuliani is going back to the old days of racial polarization. And I would like for the mayor to disassociate himself from it.”

Bloomberg appeared to do that this afternoon, although he didn’t explicitly criticize Giuliani or anything that Giuliani said.

Lynch, as deputy mayor, was criticized by opponents for his handling of the Crown Height riots between African-Americans and Orthodox Jews, which contibuted to Dinkins’ loss to Giuliani in 1993.

Lynch said Giuliani’s comments went beyond the bounds of merely promoting one candidate over another.

“What makes him say that it’ll get worse under Billy Thompson? Because he’s a candidate of color?” asked Lynch. “What says that it’ll get worse under Billy Thompson? It surely seemed like it had racial overtones. Why would he say that? He could say ‘my candidate would be better on this issue than your candidate,’ but that’s not Rudy’s m.o.”

When I asked Lynch about Bloomberg invoking Detroit as an example of what could happen to New York, Lynch said, “I don’t understand what he’s saying there. Detroit went the way it did because those great automobile jobs in the city, left.”

Interestingly, Lynch said he didn’t think Giuliani’s comments would help Bloomberg or Thompson.

“I don’t think it helps anybody to have this debate again,” he said.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President