The Lieutenant Governor Takes the Lead

ravitch dap 0 The Lieutenant Governor Takes the LeadALBANY—Richard Ravitch called me from somewhere between Albany and New York. He had been with David Paterson in Rochester the night before, speaking to an annual gathering of the Business Council. He was heading to a forum alongside the governors of Texas and Vermont. I asked him what he's been doing.

"Just working on the budget," he replied.

Ravitch's Constitutional legitimization by a split ruling of the Court of Appeals set him into motion. Paterson had envisioned him as a strong right hand, "an extension of the governor," for budgetary matters and legislative relations, but over the last week Ravitch has, without qualification, taken the lead on creating a budget plan. (The Paterson administration had all of August to develop a concrete plan to reduce the deficit—during which time Ravitch’s appointment as lieutenant governor remained in a legal limbo—but could not make any headway.)

As one prominent lobbyist put it: "I'd say he's become the executive director of our government, and Paterson is now kind of like the chairman of the board.”

Earlier this week, Ravitch traveled with Paterson to the 17th floor of the Park Avenue offices of J.P. Morgan Chase for a meeting of bankers, real estate machers and the heads of trade associations from Rochester to Long Island convened by the Partnership for New York City and the Citizens Budget Commission.

Paterson gave a speech that stuck to his increasingly emphatic message of fiscal restraint–which he hopes will be his political redemption. Then he left, with Ravitch staying to sit on a panel and shmooze before the business leaders did break-out sessions. They were excited to see him.

"I think what David was doing was trying to get somebody that has credibility with the Legislature, credibility with business and labor, but who's coming to these conversations without a political agenda," said Kathy Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York. "He has political vulnerability—Ravitch does not. So I think he brought in somebody who's a little larger than life. Governor Paterson is not going to get blamed for whatever Ravitch says or does."

And vice-versa. Ravitch can knock heads and get things done, being the "tough guy" who gives Paterson "deniability," as Wylde put it.

Senate Republican leader Dean Skelos put it to me this way: "I think the lieutenant governor is the person who he felt could come up with a plan based on his expertise in finance, and the fact that he has a certain respectability within the finance community. So we're waiting to see what he comes up with."

So how does Ravitch see himself?

"Well, I don't like to characterize myself under any circumstances—I would leave that to others—but I'm certainly very involved, and the governor is fully aware of what I'm doing and I'm in close touch with him," he said. "Of course, I'm in touch with staffs with the legislative leaders on a continuing basis."

And having spoken to business leaders, next week's agenda holds labor groups. While a traditional Democratic constituency, their relationship with Paterson has been frosty.

"I expect to have an adult conversation with them about the problem and see what ideas they have," Ravitch said. "I've spent a good part of my life with the labor movement, and so I suppose it's possible in some of these situations to characterize me as the bad guy. But I hope they don't, but if they do, I can't prevent people from calling me names. It doesn't change the fact that revenues are going down and the expenses are going up. That's the reality. That's the reality for this governor, for any other governor, and for any member of the legislature. People who are elected to office are the ones who have the burden of having to decide how to resolve these issues. I can be helpful in the process, but it's ultimately elected officials who have to make decisions."

"The press should start asking the people who want to replace them what they should do under similar circumstances," he added, prompting me to ask if he was taking a shot at any person or group who he didn't want to name.

"No, not at all. Not at all," he said. "And I'm sure they all will. It's not a criticism at all. I mean, there's not reason for anybody who doesn't have to make a decision to speak out on it."

Ravitch refused to offer any specifics on what he might propose on behalf of the executive branch or when it might be proposed. Every number shows things are getting worse.

The budget, he told me, is "evolving."

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President