The Barron-Avella Agenda

barron 1122 The Barron Avella AgendaHere’s a pair that’s been long in the making:

Tony Avella and Charles Barron, two of the City Council’s most discontented members, are proposing a “Democratic Reform Movement.” Basically, the goal is to shift power away from the speaker’s office to rank-and-file members. They make the case for, among other things, electing a black or Latino member as Speaker. Barron has announced his candidacy for the speaker position. Avella ran unsuccessfully for mayor and leaving the Council at the end of this year.

“Historically and presently, the New York City Council has been ruled and controlled by the dictatorship of the Speaker’s office,” they write.

To change that, the pair want the following changes made:

-equal distribution of capital and expense funds

-give more control to rank and file members over the legislative process

-let members, not the speaker, decide committee assignments and chairmanships

On the third page, Barron and Avella argue that the membership has grown in the Black, Latino and Asian Caucus, yet, citywide, they are not represented.

“People of color are the new majority in the City Council and in New York City as a whole. They make up 27 of 51 seats in the City Council. There are 14 Blacks, 11 Latinos, and 2 Asians. In a city where people of color make up 62 % of the population, Blacks and Latinos make up roughly 55% of the population, and the other 7 % are Asian. For there to be no Black or Latino holding a city-wide office is unacceptable. The Mayor’s White, the Speaker’s White, the Public Advocate is white and the Comptroller’s Asian. No Blacks or Latinos. We can change that by electing a Black or Latino Council Speaker. Historically, there has never been a Speaker of color, or a person of color selected to Chair one or both of the two most powerful committees in the New York City Council, the Finance Committee and the Land Use Committee.”

 

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President