<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Online Journalism Makes Money,  Mostly in Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/01/online-journalism-makes-money-mostly-in-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Online Journalism Makes Money,  Mostly in Print</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/01/online-journalism-makes-money-mostly-in-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:41:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/01/online-journalism-makes-money-mostly-in-print/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/01/online-journalism-makes-money-mostly-in-print/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/84217959.jpg?w=300&h=200" />More happy financial tidings with the close of 2009: Politico is making money. It saw a profit of a $1 million "or more" in the last calendar year, <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-politico-changes-ownership-structure-operating-profits-in-fiscal-09-kil/" target="_blank">according to Paid Content</a>.</p>
<p>Michael Wolff analyzed the Politico m.o.--the granularity, the speed, the strategy of "owning the Washington morning"--<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/wolff200908?currentPage=1" target="_blank">in last August's </a><em><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/wolff200908?currentPage=1" target="_blank">Vanity Fair</a>.</em> He pointed out the site's complex relationship to other media:</p>
<blockquote><p>Politico's writers and editors do several hundred cable appearances a week. They are becoming a one-stop source for Washington news. Politico is like an old newswire, except that it is more specialized, and focused, and fast-and it has faces. And, more important, it's free-and, unlike the teeth-gnashing old-line news companies, it has no plans or desire to charge (it will benefit from other organizations' charging, and, accordingly, undermine them).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But even if Politico's success testifies to print's demise, print advertising remains the best way to make money. The paper version of <em>Politico</em> had a circulation of 32,000 by Wolff's estimate, and matched the web site's revenue.<a href="http://paidcontent.org/images/uploads/politico_numbers.jpg" target="_blank"> The more recent numbers</a> show an even bigger gap--$11,252,410 versus $7,345,000.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/84217959.jpg?w=300&h=200" />More happy financial tidings with the close of 2009: Politico is making money. It saw a profit of a $1 million "or more" in the last calendar year, <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-politico-changes-ownership-structure-operating-profits-in-fiscal-09-kil/" target="_blank">according to Paid Content</a>.</p>
<p>Michael Wolff analyzed the Politico m.o.--the granularity, the speed, the strategy of "owning the Washington morning"--<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/wolff200908?currentPage=1" target="_blank">in last August's </a><em><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/wolff200908?currentPage=1" target="_blank">Vanity Fair</a>.</em> He pointed out the site's complex relationship to other media:</p>
<blockquote><p>Politico's writers and editors do several hundred cable appearances a week. They are becoming a one-stop source for Washington news. Politico is like an old newswire, except that it is more specialized, and focused, and fast-and it has faces. And, more important, it's free-and, unlike the teeth-gnashing old-line news companies, it has no plans or desire to charge (it will benefit from other organizations' charging, and, accordingly, undermine them).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But even if Politico's success testifies to print's demise, print advertising remains the best way to make money. The paper version of <em>Politico</em> had a circulation of 32,000 by Wolff's estimate, and matched the web site's revenue.<a href="http://paidcontent.org/images/uploads/politico_numbers.jpg" target="_blank"> The more recent numbers</a> show an even bigger gap--$11,252,410 versus $7,345,000.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/01/online-journalism-makes-money-mostly-in-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/84217959.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
