<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Met Book Looking More Roguish in Paperback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/02/met-book-looking-more-roguish-in-paperback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Met Book Looking More Roguish in Paperback</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/02/met-book-looking-more-roguish-in-paperback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:22:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/02/met-book-looking-more-roguish-in-paperback/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/02/met-book-looking-more-roguish-in-paperback/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogues_250.jpg?w=197&h=300" />When Michael Gross' unauthorized account of the Met came out this spring, the author's <a href="/2009/daily-transom/michael-gross-gets-lots-dirty-looks-little-buzz-irogues-galleryi-0" target="_blank">provocative approach</a> looked like a potential obstacle to the book's success: as the <em>Observer</em>'s Reid Pillifant reported, society connections seemed to be <a href="/2009/daily-transom/why-gross-museum-expose-missing-nypl-stacks" target="_blank">keeping it out of the NYPL</a>, and <em>The Times</em> <a href="/2009/media/michael-gross-gets-times-review-gets-happy" target="_blank">didn't review it</a> for a full two months.</p>
<p>But for the forthcoming paperback, Random House is making provocation a selling point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rogues-Gallery-Secret-History-Metropolitan/dp/0767924886/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1266252800&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><em>Rogues' Gallery: The Secret History of the Moguls and the Money that Made the Metropolitan Museum</em></a> has been recast as <em><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/23803240/Crown-Publishing-Group-Summer-2010-Catalogue" target="_blank">Rogues' Gallery: The Secret Story of the Lust, Lies, Greed, and Betrayals that Made the Metropolitan Museum of Art</a>.</em> Lust and betrayals! And should those prove inadequately intriguing, the cover image of the Met will be replaced with a celebrity photo collage featuring Anna Wintour, among others.</p>
<p>Gross is "thrilled" with the new look.</p>
<p>He says that his writing "tends to to ride the line between broadsheet and tabloid," but that when when <em>Rogues' Gallery</em> first came out, "instead of being treated as a serious book, it was treated as if it was incendiary trash."</p>
<p>So Random House "has decided to play by Chicago rules," he says. They've gone for "a jacket that fights back."</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogues_250.jpg?w=197&h=300" />When Michael Gross' unauthorized account of the Met came out this spring, the author's <a href="/2009/daily-transom/michael-gross-gets-lots-dirty-looks-little-buzz-irogues-galleryi-0" target="_blank">provocative approach</a> looked like a potential obstacle to the book's success: as the <em>Observer</em>'s Reid Pillifant reported, society connections seemed to be <a href="/2009/daily-transom/why-gross-museum-expose-missing-nypl-stacks" target="_blank">keeping it out of the NYPL</a>, and <em>The Times</em> <a href="/2009/media/michael-gross-gets-times-review-gets-happy" target="_blank">didn't review it</a> for a full two months.</p>
<p>But for the forthcoming paperback, Random House is making provocation a selling point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rogues-Gallery-Secret-History-Metropolitan/dp/0767924886/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1266252800&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><em>Rogues' Gallery: The Secret History of the Moguls and the Money that Made the Metropolitan Museum</em></a> has been recast as <em><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/23803240/Crown-Publishing-Group-Summer-2010-Catalogue" target="_blank">Rogues' Gallery: The Secret Story of the Lust, Lies, Greed, and Betrayals that Made the Metropolitan Museum of Art</a>.</em> Lust and betrayals! And should those prove inadequately intriguing, the cover image of the Met will be replaced with a celebrity photo collage featuring Anna Wintour, among others.</p>
<p>Gross is "thrilled" with the new look.</p>
<p>He says that his writing "tends to to ride the line between broadsheet and tabloid," but that when when <em>Rogues' Gallery</em> first came out, "instead of being treated as a serious book, it was treated as if it was incendiary trash."</p>
<p>So Random House "has decided to play by Chicago rules," he says. They've gone for "a jacket that fights back."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/02/met-book-looking-more-roguish-in-paperback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogues_250.jpg?w=197&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
