Reading Male Underwear Model Coverage in Today’s New York Times

2xist Reading Male Underwear Model Coverage in Todays New York TimesToday The New York Times is bringing many of the tools that journalism in the digital age has to offer — print, blogs, video and infographics (!) — to bear on an emerging beat: male underwear models. 

Call it The Times‘ double-barreled response to Annie Liebowitz’s abby Vanity Fair cover.

In print today, Eric Wilson’s style article profiles Kellan Lutz, an “abdominally gifted young actor” who has crossed over into film after his days modeling first for Abercrombie catalogs and, most recently, for Calvin Klein underwear ads. Mr. Lutz has a rom-com with Mandy Moore and a gladiator film with Samuel L. Jackson in the works, according to The Times.

On The Times Media Decoder blog is Stuart Elliot’s post about the briefs company 2(x)ist’s return to print advertising (with ads in Details, Men’s Health and Out magazines), which is not without glistening photo-illustration.

Elliot naturally takes time to explain the product.

The Sliq line, as the name suggests, is meant to be sleeker and more contoured to the body. The logo is more low key than on other 2(x)ist items.

The Sliq shorts come in brief, trunk and thong styles and there are also form-fitting T-shirts and tanks.

The company, he says, will also be “beefing up its marketing budget.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President