City Offered to Settle in Broadway Triangle Housing Development Suit

broadway triangle gmaps City Offered to Settle in Broadway Triangle Housing Development SuitFacing an uncertain legal outcome of a giant housing development planned for northern Brooklyn, the Bloomberg administration last week offered to settle with a set of community groups in an effort to end a lawsuit challenging the project, according to a letter the city sent to the judge in the case.

The city’s offer was rejected by the groups, who countered with a call for major changes to the project, known as the Broadway Triangle development. The city, in turn, rejected that offer and requested that the judge issue a decision in the case.

The Broadway Triangle project is the contentious mixed-income development in the southeastern corner of Williamsburg, where the city plans nearly 1,900 apartments, a large portion of them below-market rate. The site was rezoned by the City Council last year, although the action drew much criticism and caused a political fight within Brooklyn that divided elected officials and community groups.

Details of the settlement offer were vague, but the letter from the city to the judge suggested the city gave way on two contested issues, as it agreed to lower the number of four-bedroom apartments and agreed to extending residents of Community District 3 the ability to receive preference in affordable housing lotteries. (CD3 has a larger African-American population than the neighboring Community District 1, where the development is housed.)

Here’s an excerpt of the letter: 

As per the Court’s urging at oral argument this past Monday. our office made a proposal to petitioners’ attorneys of terms the City would consider offering to settle this case. We offered a downward modification of the number of 4-bedrorn apartments acceptable to HPD from the number in the applications made by Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens’ Council to DHCR and an extension to residents of Community District 3 of the 50% community district preference that, by long-standing City-wide policy, is ordinarily extended only to the residents of the district in which the development is sited. i.e., Community District 1.

The lawsuit, at least thus far, is going well for the opponents. The judge on the case, Justice Emily Goodman, last month ruled the case could proceed, and her decision was skeptical of many of the city’s key arguments. 

The community groups, which go under the banner of the Broadway Triangle Community Coalition, allege racial discrimination, claiming the city unfairly selected politically connected groups including the powerful Hasidic group United Jewish Organization to develop some of the site—among other concerns—thus excluding minorities.

The letter from the city to the judge is here. 

LT Ct No Settlemt (1)

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President