<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Unsurprisingly, Art World Fails to Embrace Work of Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/07/unsurprisingly-art-world-fails-to-embrace-iwork-of-arti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Unsurprisingly, Art World Fails to Embrace Work of Art</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/07/unsurprisingly-art-world-fails-to-embrace-iwork-of-arti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:46:48 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/07/unsurprisingly-art-world-fails-to-embrace-iwork-of-arti/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/07/unsurprisingly-art-world-fails-to-embrace-iwork-of-arti/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/work-jump-popup_0.jpg?w=300&h=183" />The art world hates <a href="/2010/daily-transom/work-art-reality-tv-17th-century-aesthetic" target="_blank"><em>Work of Art</em></a>, reports Salon. Why could this be?</p>
<p>California College of the Arts professor <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/07/06/work_of_art_glen_helfand/index.html" target="_blank">Glen Helfand chalks it up</a> to (shocker) high-minded disdain for reality-TV tackiness:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just hearing people on television discuss "the work" in art-world lingo, makes us art-world denizens shudder: In the context of highly formatted cable entertainment, it sounds put on and pretentious. The judges on "Work of Art," for example, look for art that makes them "feel" ("Your art didn't make us feel anything" being one of host China Chow's steely dismissal lines), and then there are the clownish, obviously expensive designer clothes they wear to their so-called crits.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, there's that precious aesthetic purity--"clownish" clothes! Heaven forfend! But more importantly: the art world's failure to ironically appreciate <em>Work of Art</em> betrays a disappointing lack of humor. It seems to us that ArtInfo's Emma Allen has <a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/35101/last-night-on-work-of-art-the-undead-get-dirty/" target="_blank">about the right idea</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/work-jump-popup_0.jpg?w=300&h=183" />The art world hates <a href="/2010/daily-transom/work-art-reality-tv-17th-century-aesthetic" target="_blank"><em>Work of Art</em></a>, reports Salon. Why could this be?</p>
<p>California College of the Arts professor <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/07/06/work_of_art_glen_helfand/index.html" target="_blank">Glen Helfand chalks it up</a> to (shocker) high-minded disdain for reality-TV tackiness:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just hearing people on television discuss "the work" in art-world lingo, makes us art-world denizens shudder: In the context of highly formatted cable entertainment, it sounds put on and pretentious. The judges on "Work of Art," for example, look for art that makes them "feel" ("Your art didn't make us feel anything" being one of host China Chow's steely dismissal lines), and then there are the clownish, obviously expensive designer clothes they wear to their so-called crits.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, there's that precious aesthetic purity--"clownish" clothes! Heaven forfend! But more importantly: the art world's failure to ironically appreciate <em>Work of Art</em> betrays a disappointing lack of humor. It seems to us that ArtInfo's Emma Allen has <a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/35101/last-night-on-work-of-art-the-undead-get-dirty/" target="_blank">about the right idea</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/07/unsurprisingly-art-world-fails-to-embrace-iwork-of-arti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/work-jump-popup_0.jpg?w=300&#38;h=183" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
