<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Did New Royalty Rates End the Random House-Wylie Standoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/08/did-new-royalty-rates-end-the-random-housewylie-standoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Did New Royalty Rates End the Random House-Wylie Standoff?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/did-new-royalty-rates-end-the-random-housewylie-standoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:48:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/did-new-royalty-rates-end-the-random-housewylie-standoff/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/did-new-royalty-rates-end-the-random-housewylie-standoff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/andrew-wylie_3.jpg?w=300&h=181" />What brought about <a href="/2010/daily-transom/random-house-and-wylie-no-longer-fight" target="_blank">yesterday's resolution</a> to the Random House-Wylie standoff, and was Wylie really the loser that he appeared to be? <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/44264-the-rh-wylie-showdown-ends-new-digital-royalty-rate-is-born.html" target="_blank"><em>Publishers Weekly </em>hears </a>that Random House has been maneuvering behind the scenes to appease agents:</p>
<blockquote><p>One high-placed source with direct knowledge of the rights talks said the house has quietly been offering agents a better deal on backlist e-book rights for a brief period now.</p>
<p>The source said Random is offering a royalty built around a sliding schedule on e-book rights for backlist titles that can approach 40% "rather quickly." The source explained that the royalty is based on a certain number of books selling over a specified period of time and, depending on what's negotiated, the rate will rise based on the rate of sale.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Regardless, the question remains of what Wylie hoped to accomplish with the original gambit: Did he seriously intend to become an e-book publisher? Sara Weinman at DailyFinance<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/random-house-andrew-wylie-backlist-ebook-amazon-kindle-rights-deal/19607446/" target="_blank"> thinks not</a>. "The origins of Odyssey Editions seemed scatter-shot and unfocused at  best," she writes.</p>
<p>Maybe he just wanted to keep publishing people on their toes in the slow summer months.</p>
<p><em></em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/andrew-wylie_3.jpg?w=300&h=181" />What brought about <a href="/2010/daily-transom/random-house-and-wylie-no-longer-fight" target="_blank">yesterday's resolution</a> to the Random House-Wylie standoff, and was Wylie really the loser that he appeared to be? <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/44264-the-rh-wylie-showdown-ends-new-digital-royalty-rate-is-born.html" target="_blank"><em>Publishers Weekly </em>hears </a>that Random House has been maneuvering behind the scenes to appease agents:</p>
<blockquote><p>One high-placed source with direct knowledge of the rights talks said the house has quietly been offering agents a better deal on backlist e-book rights for a brief period now.</p>
<p>The source said Random is offering a royalty built around a sliding schedule on e-book rights for backlist titles that can approach 40% "rather quickly." The source explained that the royalty is based on a certain number of books selling over a specified period of time and, depending on what's negotiated, the rate will rise based on the rate of sale.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Regardless, the question remains of what Wylie hoped to accomplish with the original gambit: Did he seriously intend to become an e-book publisher? Sara Weinman at DailyFinance<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/random-house-andrew-wylie-backlist-ebook-amazon-kindle-rights-deal/19607446/" target="_blank"> thinks not</a>. "The origins of Odyssey Editions seemed scatter-shot and unfocused at  best," she writes.</p>
<p>Maybe he just wanted to keep publishing people on their toes in the slow summer months.</p>
<p><em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/did-new-royalty-rates-end-the-random-housewylie-standoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/andrew-wylie_3.jpg?w=300&#38;h=181" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
