Planned Parenthood Backs Bronx Challengers, Questions Diaz’s Elevator Comportment

diazandespada Planned Parenthood Backs Bronx Challengers, Questions Diazs Elevator ComportmentPlanned Parenthood of New York City is taking a pass on endorsing incumbent state Senators Ruben Diaz Sr. and Pedro Espada Jr. in the Bronx, opting to support their respective challengers, Charlie Ramos and Gustavo Rivera.

“Senator Ruben Diaz, Sr. represents neighborhoods that have some of the highest rates of teen pregnancy and STD transmission in the city, yet Diaz has consistently opposed every piece of legislation aimed at addressing these issues,” said Matthew Traub, Chair of the Board of Directors of the Action Fund, in a statement.

The group is also mailing against Diaz, with a story from one of its young activists who says she had an awkward encounter with the senator in an elevator at the capitol, during a lobbying trip to Albany.

“Senator Diaz Sr. must have known I was with Planned Parenthood from the t-shirt I was wearing with the logo and asked me how such a pretty girl could volunteer with Planned Parenthood,” she writes. “I was speechless! I mean, what would you say if a State Senator asked you that?”

The letter (in full below) is one of three pieces of mail the group is sending on behalf of Ramos.

In Espada’s case, the group blames his party-hopping last summer for derailing the Reproductive Health Act.

“Instead of voting to protect the women of his district, Espada selfishly put his own personal goals and lust for power first,” said Traub. “We are proud to endorse Gustavo Rivera’s promised leadership over Pedro Espada’s neglect.”

Traub called both challengers “100% pro-choice.”

It’s unclear how reproductive rights play into the politics of the borough–where Diaz has been proudly anti-progressive on issues like same-sex marriage for years–but another set of activists working and mailing against the senators certainly doesn’t help their cause.

Planned Parenthood Diaz Letter

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President